DANIEL DINDA
- Citation
- DANIEL DINDA
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 12 December 2024
- Posture
- Criminal / Bail Application Ruling
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 12 December 2024
- Posture
- Criminal / Bail Application Ruling
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The accused is entitled to bail as the offence is bailable, he previously complied with bail conditions, and there is no reason to refuse the application.
Court disposition
bail granted with conditions
Orders
- The accused must sign bail bond of TZS 3,000,000.
- The accused must register two reliable sureties able to execute bail bond of TZS 1,000,000 each, possessing NIDA or work ID cards.
- Sureties must be residents of Mara Region and verify residence with introduction letters from local chairpersons.
- The accused must not leave Mara Region without written authorization from the Deputy Registrar or Resident Magistrate In-charge of the District Court of Rorya.
- The accused must report to the Deputy Registrar or Resident Magistrate In-charge once every last Monday of every month.
- The accused must surrender his passport or any other travelling documents to the Deputy Registrar or Resident Magistrate In-charge.
02
Material facts
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution Counsel: Ms. Dotto BangaDaniel Philimon Dinda
Accused Counsel: Mr. Samson SarnoAmounts and remedies
- Accused Bail Bond: TZS 3,000,000
- Surety Bail Bond (each): TZS 1,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Bail Application Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the accused is entitled to bail for the offence charged
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The accused is prosecuted for a bailable offence, previously enjoyed bail without breach, and is a trustful person to the court.
- Respondent
- The offence is bailable and the accused may be granted bail, subject to appropriate conditions to ensure his availability.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
section 148 (1), (6) & (7) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap. 20 R.E. 2022]; articles 13 (6) (b) & 17 (1) of the Constitution
Bail is available for bailable offences unless there are reasons to refuse it.
- 02
Maruru Zabron v. Republic, Misc. Criminal Application No. 24 of 2023; Daniel Philimon Dinda v. Republic, Misc. Criminal Application No. 20710 of 2024
Precedents confirm the right to bail in similar circumstances.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The accused is entitled to bail as the offence is bailable, he previously complied with bail conditions, and there is no reason to refuse the application.
Court disposition
bail granted with conditions
- The accused must sign bail bond of TZS 3,000,000.
- The accused must register two reliable sureties able to execute bail bond of TZS 1,000,000 each, possessing NIDA or work ID cards.
- Sureties must be residents of Mara Region and verify residence with introduction letters from local chairpersons.
- The accused must not leave Mara Region without written authorization from the Deputy Registrar or Resident Magistrate In-charge of the District Court of Rorya.
- The accused must report to the Deputy Registrar or Resident Magistrate In-charge once every last Monday of every month.
- The accused must surrender his passport or any other travelling documents to the Deputy Registrar or Resident Magistrate In-charge.
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 12 December 2024
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 12 December 2024
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (JUDICIARY)
THE HIGH COURT (MUSOMA SUB- REGISTRY AT TARIME]
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL SESSION CASE No. 31608 OF 2023 (Referenced: 202411062000031608)
THE REPUBLIC Versus
DANIEL PHILIMON DINDA
RULING 12.12.2024 & 16.12.2024 Mtulya,J.: The instant case, Criminal Sessions Case No. 31608 of 2024 (the case) was scheduled for plea taking and preliminary hearing procedures on 12th day of December 2024. After completion of the procedures, Mr. Samson Sarno, learned counsel, who appeared for Mr. Daniel Philimon Dinda (the accused), had lodged oral application under sections 148 (1) and 392A (1) 8c (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap. 20 R.E. 2022] (the Act) praying for bail to the accused. According to him, the offence which the accused is prosecuted in this court is bailable and the accused had previously enjoyed bail in both the committing court in Rorya District and this court during preliminary hearing, without any breach of the conditions hence he displays as a trustful person to this court. The application and reasons in favor of the bail were not protested by learned State Attorney, Ms. Dotto Banga, who represented the Republic. In his opinion, the offence is bailable and the accused may be granted bail. However, she thinks that, this court may issue appropriate conditions to make the accused available when called to reply the information against him in this court. I have glanced the law regulating bail in cases, like instant one, the records of the present case and proceedings of this court in Misc. Criminal Application No. 20710 of 2024 and Criminal Sessions Case
No. 18563 of 2024 and perused the record of District Court of Rorya at Rorya (the committing court) in Preliminary Inquiry Case No. 8186 of 2024 (the committal proceedings) which concerns the present accused person, and found that the accused had previously enjoyed bail at this court and committing court without breach of conditions. The accused was arraigned in this court to reply the information of Acts Intended to Cause Grievous Harm to Mr. Philimon Awiti (the victim) by cutting his chin, upper lip and nose contrary to section 222 (a) of the Penal Code [Cap. 16 R.E. 2022] (the Penal Code). The incident is allegedly to have occurred on 1st August 2023 at Marasibora Village within Rorya District in Mara Region. The offence of which the accused is prosecuted is bailable under section 148 (1), (6) & (7) of the Act and articles 13 (6) (b) & 17 (1) of the Constitution. The indicated provisions of the law have already received interpretation of this court in a bunch of precedents (see: Maruru Zabron v. Republic, Misc. Criminal 2 Application No. 24 of 2023; and Daniel Philimon Dinda v. Republic, Misc. Criminal Application No. 20710 of 2024). Having the law and precedents on the subject, I have no any reasons to refuse the application. In the final analysis, I am moved to grant bail to the accused. However, in order for the accused to enjoy bail, he must fulfill the following
conditions, namely: 1. The accused must sign bail bond of Tanzanian Shillings Three Million Only (3,000,000/=); 2. The accused must register two (2) reliable sureties who are able to execute bail bond amounting to Tanzanian Shillings One Million Only (1,000,000/=) each and must be in possession of National Identification Card issued by the National Identification Authority (NIDA) or if he is employed in government service, he must register work identification card; 3. The sureties must be residents of Mara Region and verify their stay in the region by presenting introduction letters from their respective hamlet or mtaa chairpersons; 4. The accused should not leave Mara Region without prior written authorization of the Deputy Registrar of this Sub Registry or Resident Magistrate In-charge of the District Court of Rorya at Rorya; 5. The accused must report to the Deputy Registrar of this Sub Registry or Resident Magistrate In-charge of the 3 District Court of Rorya at Rorya, once on every last Monday of every Month; and 6. The accused must surrender his passport or any other travelling documents to the Deputy Registrar of this Sub Registry or Resident Magistrate In-charge of the District Court of Rorya at Rorya. The listed bail conditions in this Ruling shall be supervised by the Deputy Registrar of this Sub Registry or Resident Court: This Ruling was delivered in Chambers under the Seal of this court in the presence of the accused's learned counsel, Mr. Samson Sarno and in the presence of Ms. Dotto Banga, learned State Attorney for the respondent. Judge 16.12.2024 4
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.