Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

benson vitalis malembo others vs republic 2017 tzhcced 16 6 october 2017

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The offences are bailable, there is no objection from the respondent, and the court has jurisdiction; bail is granted subject to statutory and court-imposed conditions.

Court disposition

bail granted

Orders

  • Each applicant to deposit Tshs. 901,355,016.00 or immovable property of equivalent value.
  • Each applicant to provide two reliable sureties to execute a bond of Tshs 25,000,000/= each, one being a government or public institution employee.
  • Applicants not to leave the court's jurisdiction without permission of the Deputy Registrar.
  • Applicants to surrender passports or travel documents to the Deputy Registrar.
  • Applicants to report to RCO Dar es Salaam as scheduled by the Regional Crimes Officer.
  • Verification of sureties and bond documents to be done by Resident Magistrate Court of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu.

02

Material facts

Parties

Benson Vitalis Malembo

Applicant Counsel: Amin Mshana

David Faustine Chimomo

Applicant

Safina Kassim Rupia

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Bail Amount Per Applicant: TZS 901,355,016
  • Surety Bond Per Surety: TZS 25,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The offences charged are bailable and applicants seek lenient bail conditions, submitting affidavits in support.
Respondent
No objection to bail; requested the court to be guided by the law in setting conditions.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    S. 29(4)(d) and 36(1) of the EOCCA [Cap 200 R.E. 2002]

    Bail is available for bailable offences under the EOCCA, subject to statutory conditions.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The offences are bailable, there is no objection from the respondent, and the court has jurisdiction; bail is granted subject to statutory and court-imposed conditions.

Obiter and limits

  • The merits of the charge are not to be considered at the bail stage; challenges to the substance of the charge should be made at trial.

Court disposition

bail granted

  • Each applicant to deposit Tshs. 901,355,016.00 or immovable property of equivalent value.
  • Each applicant to provide two reliable sureties to execute a bond of Tshs 25,000,000/= each, one being a government or public institution employee.
  • Applicants not to leave the court's jurisdiction without permission of the Deputy Registrar.
  • Applicants to surrender passports or travel documents to the Deputy Registrar.
  • Applicants to report to RCO Dar es Salaam as scheduled by the Regional Crimes Officer.
  • Verification of sureties and bond documents to be done by Resident Magistrate Court of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 6 October 2017

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 6 October 2017

benson vitalis malembo others vs republic 2017 tzhcced 16 6 october 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA

CORRUPTION AND ECONOMIC CRIMES DIVISION (DAR ES SALAAM REGISTRY)

AT PAR ES SALAAM MISC. ECONOMIC CAUSE NO. 38 & 39 OF 2017 (Originating from Economic Crime Case No. 35 of 2015 Kisutu Court) 1. BENSON VITALIS MALEMBO 2. DAVID FAUSTINE CHIMOMO - ..... APPLICANTS 3. SAFINA KASSIM RUPIA

VERSUS REPUBLIC................................................ RESPONDENT Date of last order- 4/10/2017 Date of Ruling - 6/10/2017

RULING W.B.Korosso.J: Before the Court was Misc. Economic Cause No. 38 of 2017 with Benson Vitalis Malembo as the applicant and Misc. Economic Case No. 39 of 2017 where David Faustine Chimomo and Safina Kassim Rupia where the applicants. All the applications emanate from Economic Crime Case No. 35 of 2015 at Kisutu RM’s Court. The court upon application by counsels for the applicants and having no registered objection from the respondents, proceeded to consolidated the two applications, leading to all being under the auspices of Misc. Economic cause No. 38 of 2017 and thereafter having Benson Vitalis Malembo as the 1st Applicant; David Faustine Chimomo as the 2nd applicant and the 3rd applicant being Safina Kassim Rupia. Having considered the submissions by counsels for the applicants, the applications are filed under S. 29 (4) (d) and 36(1) of the EOCCA, [Cap 200 R.E. 2002]. The applicants prayed for their affidavits for 1st applicant deposed by Amin Mshana duly appointed and instructed Advocate and a joint affidavit by the 2nd and 3rd applicant to be part of the applicants submission. The applicants submitted that the offences they are charged with are bail able and prayed for lenient conditions which they will be able to fulfil if the Court is inclined to grant bail. The Court despite advancement by the counsel for the 1st applicant to also consider the merit of the charge

against the 1st applicant when considering bail finds that it is not the proper time at this juncture to go into the merits of the charge and if the applicant feels they are malicious or do not reflect the reality then the proper place to challenge is at the Court hearing the matter and not at this stage of determination of bail application. The court finds no reason to refuse bail, the respondents having registered no objection only to pray the Court be guided by the law when considering conditions if it grants bail. This being the case and being satisfied that it has the jurisdiction to entertain the application, Benson Vitalis Malembo, David Faustine Chimomo and Safina Kassim Rupia are hereby admitted to bail upon the following conditions set hereinunder; 1. Each applicant to deposit Tshs. 901,355,016.00 or immovable property of equivalent value. The amount being derived after considering the principle of sharing, there being seven accused persons in Economic Crime Case No. 35 of 2015 pending at RM’s Court of Dar es salaam at Kisutu.

2. Each applicant to provide two reliable sureties who are to execute a bond of Tshs 25,000,000/= each. One of the two sureties for each applicant must be employed in the service of the Government of United Republic of Tanzania or a Public Institution.

3. The applicants are not to leave the jurisdiction of this Court without permission of the Deputy Registrar.

4. The applicant to surrender passport or other travelling documents to Deputy Registrar..

5. Applicants to report to RCO Dar es salaam upon a schedule designed by the Regional Crimes Officer.

6. Verification of documents related to sureties and bond to be effected by Resident Magistrate Court of Dar es salaam at Kisutu. Winfrida B. Korosso, Judge, O *.'//'•>' V .3.V ; tV-l'v < 'll 6 October, 2017

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Economic and Organized Crime Control Act (EOCCA) Cap 200 R.E. 2002, S. 29(4)(d)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Economic and Organized Crime Control Act (EOCCA) Cap 200 R.E. 2002, S. 36(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.