david maulid vs the republic 2023 tzhc 19551 24 july 2023

david maulid vs the republic 2023 tzhc 19551 24 july 2023

The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay in filing the notice and petition of appeal, as supported by the affidavit and conceded by the respondent. The statutory requirement for sufficient reason under section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act was met.

Citation
david maulid vs the republic 2023 tzhc 19551 24 july 2023
Parties
Applicant: David s/o Maulid; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Procedural Delay
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David s/o Maulid

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file notice and petition of appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay in filing the notice and petition of appeal, as supported by the affidavit and conceded by the respondent. The statutory requirement for sufficient reason under section 361(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act was met.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Applicant to lodge notice of appeal within 10 days from the date of ruling
  • Applicant to lodge petition of appeal within 30 days from the date of ruling