20160621 tzhc arusha
The application was rendered incompetent due to failure to properly cite the applicable legal provisions, specifically the relevant subsection and subrule, as required by settled case law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 20160621 tzhc arusha
- Parties
- Applicant: Edward Sinno; Respondent: Marimo Lulu
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Review / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Review Applications, Citation of Legal Provisions, Competence of Applications
- Source Language
- english
Civil Procedure Review Applications Citation of Legal Provisions Competence of Applications
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Edward Sinno
Applicant
Marimo Lulu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Review / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for review is competent given the citation of wrong and incomplete legal provisions
Ratio Decidendi
The application was rendered incompetent due to failure to properly cite the applicable legal provisions, specifically the relevant subsection and subrule, as required by settled case law.
Court Disposition
Application struck out with costs
Orders
- Application struck out with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment