Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The application is dismissed as it constitutes an abuse of court process, is res judicata, and the court is functus officio, having already dismissed a previous review application on the same matter for being time barred.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal quashed part of a High Court ruling on revision, holding that the judge revisited issues already decided and erred after striking out the application.
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania dismissed an application for extension of time to seek review, finding the applicant failed to explain a three-month delay.
The High Court Land Division dismissed a review application as time-barred, holding it was filed outside the statutory period and without leave to extend time.
The High Court Land Division dismissed a review application as time barred, holding that withdrawal of an earlier review with leave to refile did not extend limitation time.
The application for review of the Deputy Registrar's decision is subject to a fifteen-day limitation period under Rule 27(1) of the Labour Court Rules. The application was filed after thirty-six days and is therefore time barred and must be dismissed.
Source excerpt
Attaching a copy of decree to the application for review is not a legal requirement according to binding precedent from the Court of Appeal.
Source excerpt
The date of filing is the date on which the filing fee is paid, not the date of electronic submission. Since the fee was paid on 16th March, 2023, the application was filed out of time and is therefore dismissed.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania granted Robert Sanganya extra time to file a review application, finding his delay was beyond his control while in prison.
The application was filed out of time, and Section 3(1) of the Law of Limitation Act mandates dismissal of such proceedings; applicant's concession confirms incompetence of the application.
Source excerpt
Explore more
