20111116 TZCA Mwanza
- Citation
- 20111116 TZCA Mwanza
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 16 November 2011
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Withdrawal Before Hearing
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 16 November 2011
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Withdrawal Before Hearing
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal was withdrawn as per the appellant's application and the respondent's lack of objection, in accordance with Rule 4(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
Court disposition
appeal withdrawn
Orders
- Appeal marked withdrawn under Rule 4(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
02
Material facts
Parties
Erasto Joseph
Appellant Counsel: Deya OutaThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Pius Hilla03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Withdrawal Before Hearing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn under Rule 4(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant applied to withdraw the appeal under Rule 4(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
- Respondent
- The respondent had no objection to the withdrawal application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
Appeal may be withdrawn by appellant with leave of the court under Rule 4(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal was withdrawn as per the appellant's application and the respondent's lack of objection, in accordance with Rule 4(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.
Court disposition
appeal withdrawn
- Appeal marked withdrawn under Rule 4(2)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 16 November 2011
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 16 November 2011
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA
ATMWANZA (CORAM: NSEKELA, J.A., MASSATI, J.A., AND MANDIA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 231 OF 2010 ERASTO JOSEPH ••••••.•••••••••.••...••••••·••••••.•••••••••••••••• ~ ••••.•••••••••••••••• APPELLANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• RESPONDENT (Application for Conviction of the High court of Tanzania at Bukoba) ( Mzuna J.) dated 6th day of August, 2009 in Criminal Sess·ion No. 96 of 2005
RULING IN THE COURT 16th November, 2011 MANDIA. J.A.: The appeal was set for hearing this morning. The appellant was represented by Mr. Deya Outa, learned advocate, while the respondent Republic is represented by Mr. Pius Hilla, and learned State Attorney. Mr. Deya Outa, learned advocate, has applied to the Court to withdraw the appeal under Rule 4(2) (a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1 ,, ' ',./2009. Mr. Pius Hilla, learned State Attorney, has no objection to the ', prayer. On our part we accede to the prayers. The appeal is accordingly , marked withdrawn under Rule 4 (2) (a) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. Order accordingly. DATED at MWANZA this 16th day of November, 2011. H. R. NSEKELA
JUSTICE OF APPEAL S. A. MASSATI
JUSTICE OF APPEAL W. S. MANDIA
JUSTICE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original ~rKYA
SENIOR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
COURT OF APPEAL 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.