Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19841018 TZHC Mbeya1

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The appellant was lawfully convicted as he admitted possession without authority, and late evidence cannot be considered on appeal.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction and sentence affirmed

02

Material facts

Parties

F TThXLJ JiJLiiS lLIl

Appellant

State

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Fine: Shs 1,500

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellant claimed to have a receipt and prescription for the medicine but admitted no authority or proof of ownership at the time of arrest.
Respondent
Appellant was found in possession of part one poison without lawful authority or proof of ownership; late evidence cannot be considered.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General criminal procedure

    Evidence not presented at trial cannot be considered on appeal unless additional evidence is formally admitted.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The appellant was lawfully convicted as he admitted possession without authority, and late evidence cannot be considered on appeal.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • conviction and sentence affirmed

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 18 October 1984

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 18 October 1984

19841018 TZHC Mbeya1

17t'1 Ij I11 IttC (X;IBT OF tLUJLhI ;rj• Lr.SL AiL JW.ISDICTION (3Jm : .xasny) CflLLLL L NO. 2 OP 1984 OIGINL CRThN.L CASE NO. 86 OF 1982 OP THE DITJaCT COIJ1T OF N?ANDA DISTHICT Defore T. B. Thji, Dsq., District i'ia"iotrato. FANtThI J,JS IULIICI ....., 1rJRSUJ ¶[T} L • , . , • . • , • . • • • , . . . ., • 1.. ('. ). . r iusj. uii.0 CH: i3ejng in un1'wfill poesasin of part one poison c/ss37(1) of the Phaercitical and Poison ict llo,9/78 and S(,ct:on 72A (i) of Aci 1/1981. JUD 4TI. The appellant F TThXLJ JiJLiiS lLIl was oonviQted of thL c.fonce of being in un1aifnl posoession of part 1 poisofl contrary -'- i ctions 37 (1) and 40 (4) and 9 (b) of Act :0.9 of 1978 and he was eentnec1. to a fine of f' Shs.1,500/ r two nonths iraprisonrient in default. IIe:icC ;L.S appeal now. I see no r,it in this appeal. The apDollant adnits h.v:n been found with one bottle of periciUine injection :icdllcin which 1ia1ysed by the góvex,uent dtor at Npana as part one poiSon.. In hi 1cfenco he say s this izitex aUag.. " had no authority to justify or nrove my orncrhip. I have novnr cone to Police Station to pftco:.ny cash nalc or authority to pr ve my ownersi to justify ny possossion o ie medicine since I N. rosted to date. !Ie clatmed hoiiever to have a receimt .ior th neclici:: ihich was losued to hira by Kasjba Dispensary. I cannot c in the circumstances what elese the tl court could do but

convict th. apeilant as chard. I notice now that he has attach€4 to his iiumorandu i of i:eel i rCoi)t fi'on a disponsay1 Npanda in his nnie ehc;iin; an.i also a nrescription forn from the saie dieponsary instructilk; tht he be supliec. :yi:h 1 vial of PP for home use. But this cannot now be taken into acnu:.t because it is coning too late after the end the trial. There iTcO no rd.r of additional evidence roMe and thooc rocoipt \Tli.ch hav' in ached to the petition of appeel cannot therefore be considered. . . . . . I.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Pharmaceutical and Poison Act No.9/78

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 72A(i) of Act 1/1981

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.