19841018 TZHC Mbeya1
- Citation
- 19841018 TZHC Mbeya1
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 18 October 1984
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 18 October 1984
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appellant was lawfully convicted as he admitted possession without authority, and late evidence cannot be considered on appeal.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence affirmed
02
Material facts
Parties
F TThXLJ JiJLiiS lLIl
AppellantState
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Fine: Shs 1,500
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the appellant was unlawfully in possession of part one poison
- 02
Whether late-submitted evidence (receipt and prescription) can be considered on appeal
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Appellant claimed to have a receipt and prescription for the medicine but admitted no authority or proof of ownership at the time of arrest.
- Respondent
- Appellant was found in possession of part one poison without lawful authority or proof of ownership; late evidence cannot be considered.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
General criminal procedure
Evidence not presented at trial cannot be considered on appeal unless additional evidence is formally admitted.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appellant was lawfully convicted as he admitted possession without authority, and late evidence cannot be considered on appeal.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- conviction and sentence affirmed
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 18 October 1984
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 18 October 1984
17t'1 Ij I11 IttC (X;IBT OF tLUJLhI ;rj• Lr.SL AiL JW.ISDICTION (3Jm : .xasny) CflLLLL L NO. 2 OP 1984 OIGINL CRThN.L CASE NO. 86 OF 1982 OP THE DITJaCT COIJ1T OF N?ANDA DISTHICT Defore T. B. Thji, Dsq., District i'ia"iotrato. FANtThI J,JS IULIICI ....., 1rJRSUJ ¶[T} L • , . , • . • , • . • • • , . . . ., • 1.. ('. ). . r iusj. uii.0 CH: i3ejng in un1'wfill poesasin of part one poison c/ss37(1) of the Phaercitical and Poison ict llo,9/78 and S(,ct:on 72A (i) of Aci 1/1981. JUD 4TI. The appellant F TThXLJ JiJLiiS lLIl was oonviQted of thL c.fonce of being in un1aifnl posoession of part 1 poisofl contrary -'- i ctions 37 (1) and 40 (4) and 9 (b) of Act :0.9 of 1978 and he was eentnec1. to a fine of f' Shs.1,500/ r two nonths iraprisonrient in default. IIe:icC ;L.S appeal now. I see no r,it in this appeal. The apDollant adnits h.v:n been found with one bottle of periciUine injection :icdllcin which 1ia1ysed by the góvex,uent dtor at Npana as part one poiSon.. In hi 1cfenco he say s this izitex aUag.. " had no authority to justify or nrove my orncrhip. I have novnr cone to Police Station to pftco:.ny cash nalc or authority to pr ve my ownersi to justify ny possossion o ie medicine since I N. rosted to date. !Ie clatmed hoiiever to have a receimt .ior th neclici:: ihich was losued to hira by Kasjba Dispensary. I cannot c in the circumstances what elese the tl court could do but
convict th. apeilant as chard. I notice now that he has attach€4 to his iiumorandu i of i:eel i rCoi)t fi'on a disponsay1 Npanda in his nnie ehc;iin; an.i also a nrescription forn from the saie dieponsary instructilk; tht he be supliec. :yi:h 1 vial of PP for home use. But this cannot now be taken into acnu:.t because it is coning too late after the end the trial. There iTcO no rd.r of additional evidence roMe and thooc rocoipt \Tli.ch hav' in ached to the petition of appeel cannot therefore be considered. . . . . . I.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.