fabian buberwa vs leonida daniel 2018 tzhc 2679 27 june 2018
- Citation
- fabian buberwa vs leonida daniel 2018 tzhc 2679 27 june 2018
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 27 June 2018
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 27 June 2018
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The application was incompetent due to wrong citation of the enabling provision, and the appeal lacks merit.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
02
Material facts
Parties
Fabian Buberwa
AppellantLeonida Daniel
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether wrong citation of the enabling provision renders the application incompetent
- 02
Whether the District Court erred in dismissing the application instead of striking it out
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant challenged the District Court's dismissal of his application, arguing that the ruling was faulty due to the alleged wrong citation of the enabling provision.
- Respondent
- The respondent supported the District Court's decision, asserting that the cited provision did not exist and the application was incompetent.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court of Appeal of Tanzania decisions
Non-citation or wrong citation of the law renders an application incompetent.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The application was incompetent due to wrong citation of the enabling provision, and the appeal lacks merit.
Obiter and limits
- The proper redress for an incompetent application is striking it out, not dismissal.
- No order as to costs due to extenuating factors and the age of the parties.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 27 June 2018
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 27 June 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
AT BUKOBA PC. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2017 (Arising from RM Criminal Application No. 14 of2016 and Criminal Application No. 46 of 2014 D/Court Bukoba from Criminal Case No. 38 of2014 Karabagaine Primary Court) FABIAN BUBERWA—---- —.................... APPELANT
VERSUS LEONIDA DANIEL....................... RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT 27/06/2018 BONGOLE, J. The appellant Fabian Buberwa is complaining before this court faulting the Ruling of the District Court in District Court of Bukoba Criminal Application No. 14 of 2016 where his application was dismissed for wrong citation of the enabling provision. I have a chance of glancing on the impugned ruling and the proceedings in District Court Criminal Application No. 14 of 2016 where I find that the said application was made under Section 321 (1) of the Magistrates Court Act (Cap. 11 RE: 202). The trial magistrate observed that such provisions of the law do not exist and proceeded in dismissing the application. It is obvious and trite that such provisions of the law cited by the appellant do not exist as correctly pointed by the trial magistrate. There are plotheral of decisions of the CAT that non citation or wrong citation of the law renders the application incompetent. The redress to an incompetent application is that of stricking it out insteady of dismissal. Wherefore that been observed, the application before the District Court was incompetent for wrong citation of the enabling provision of the law. This appeal is therefore with no merit and accordingly it is dismissed. No order as to costs taking into account the extinuating factors and the age of the parties. Accordingly ordered. 27/6/2018
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.