felix lendita vs michael longidu 2024 tzca 131 21 february 2024
The application before the court is not an application for a second bite but an application for extension of time to file such an application. Therefore, the preliminary objection that the application is time-barred is misplaced and is overruled.
- Citation
- felix lendita vs michael longidu 2024 tzca 131 21 february 2024
- Parties
- Applicant: Felix Lendita; Respondent: Michael Longid'u
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection overruled
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Preliminary Objection, Court Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Felix Lendita
Applicant
Michael Longid'u
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for extension of time is time-barred
- 2 Whether the preliminary objection is properly raised
Ratio Decidendi
The application before the court is not an application for a second bite but an application for extension of time to file such an application. Therefore, the preliminary objection that the application is time-barred is misplaced and is overruled.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection overruled
Orders
- Application adjourned to a future session as scheduled by the Registrar
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment