Misc
The High Court Land Division allowed the applicant to withdraw a land application at an early stage and made no order as to costs.
- Withdrawal of application
- Costs
- Court procedure
- Withdrawal-of-application
- Land-procedure
- Civil-procedure
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court Land Division allowed the applicant to withdraw a land application at an early stage and made no order as to costs.
A supplementary affidavit filed without leave of court after pleadings are closed is procedurally improper and must be expunged from the record. The preliminary objection qualifies as a pure point of law and is sustained.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal overruled a preliminary objection, holding that the motion was for extension of time to file a second-bite application, not the second-bite application itself.
The administration proceedings in the primary court were fundamentally flawed due to incomplete and improperly filled forms, lack of evidence regarding the will, and failure to distribute all estate assets to heirs. The closure of the administration cause did not preclude the High Court from intervening to correct these illegalities. The district court erred in dismissing the revision application without addressing these substantive defects.
Source excerpt
The High Court struck out a revision application because its supporting affidavit was attested by an advocate without a valid practicing certificate, but granted leave to refile within seven days.
Applicant failed to substantiate the alleged accident with credible evidence; medical chit did not prove incapacity on hearing date; no police report or supporting affidavit from Court Clerk; absence not justified; restoration of dismissed application denied.
Source excerpt
The High Court Land Division dismissed an application to set aside a dismissal for non-appearance, finding the applicants had not shown sufficient cause.
The High Court refused extension of time to seek restoration of a dismissed land case, finding the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for delay.
The application for extension of time is incurably defective due to its improper title as a Taxation Reference and inconsistent filing dates. Such defects go to the root of the court record and cannot be cured by the overriding objective principle. The application is therefore struck out with costs, with liberty to refile subject to time limitation.
Source excerpt
The High Court Land Division struck out an application for enlargement of time because it repeated a prior affidavit defect and the court was functus officio.
Explore more