19890419 TZCA Bukoba
- Citation
- 19890419 TZCA Bukoba
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 19 April 1989
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 19 April 1989
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The conviction was upheld because the evidence, including the appellant's confession and identification of the stolen property, established guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appellant's attempt to repudiate his confession was rejected as an afterthought, and the sentence imposed was within statutory limits and justified by the prevalence of the offence.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence upheld
02
Material facts
Parties
Fulgence Basimaki
AppellantThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Malejshn, State AttorneyAmounts and remedies
- Sentence: years 9
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the conviction for obtaining money by false pretenses was proper
- 02
Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate
- 03
Whether the confession was voluntary
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant denied involvement in the offence, claimed he was not present, and argued his confession was made under duress to save his life.
- Respondent
- The State supported the conviction and sentence, arguing the evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the confession was not challenged at trial.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
general criminal law
A conviction must be based on evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
- 02
case law and criminal procedure
A confession not challenged at trial is presumed voluntary unless proven otherwise.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The conviction was upheld because the evidence, including the appellant's confession and identification of the stolen property, established guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appellant's attempt to repudiate his confession was rejected as an afterthought, and the sentence imposed was within statutory limits and justified by the prevalence of the offence.
Obiter and limits
- The prevalence of cattle theft in the area justifies stern sentencing to protect innocent lives and government revenue.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- conviction and sentence upheld
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 19 April 1989
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 19 April 1989
1 IN .L.'IIE TIIGH COUR ...1 0::::1 :£1.A?ZAi.'HA Ai BUKOBA HC. CRINrnAL J1f?EAL Nao 33 OF 1994 (Or,-iginal Criminal Case Ifoo 222 of 1992 at Bukoba) Beforei CoS• BILL~EA, Esq.,, RESDJEXh1 MJ1.GIS.t.1RAl1E., FULG:1.'JC:C B,ASII,i,f.11(.1 • o • • ,o o o_ o o o • o • • • o • • o • o o JI.Pl'ELLAN'.i.1 versus .illE REFU:B LI C RESFmrnDi 'J..1 JUDGMZN'.i.1 IvlAS.ANClIE 2 Jg 'lhe· appellant Fulgrnce Ba..sirn~i, was charged on tm counts. He w:as cha:rgea_, on first count, wHh o·,)·'.:aining money by Zalse pretenses c/s 302:·of the:-Pmal Gode. On this one, :-h2 was convicted and se;.1tenced_-_ to:-s~en y~ars.::.imprisonment. _-__-_ On ~:1e second count, that of t.'leH., he wa;J.-acquittod. :ilie o.ppellant--:is a~{gr.ieved and appeals to tl'.:is Court; 1-':r. Ebago,- the learned Sta·::e:A-~·::on!ey has supported_both conviction a,."lc:. sa:.~:ence,:.. on this, fir§·~ counto 'i'b.e facts of..the case are no·t in a '..::errible dispute.,_ ~ :tl1e ax,ella.nt, former polic<'.!man, on lC/12/91, we:1.t -'.:o - Barahiah:·.A;n:rani, PWo1, and told this PW .. 1 iliat he (appe:'.lant) llad.::.a.-:-mo-~01~ycle he was.:-selling.;; lle ·::.old tl1e complainent:- - that t.'1e mo·'.:ox cycle, -wi:1'.J.1 Regis-~ra-do;:1 No. :1-Z 7341s war:: at the ELC'.1.1 ( :tl1e Eva11gelical Lu.-:)i-:cra11 Chu;rc:,r o:f :.:'a_r1s2:'lia)::,gro1..n2d.s here in IluJ.co;)a, .: ~lie ar,i:;ella':1 :·. soi1-~-- ·'J_;_c
co1:1pl.::.i::.:.ant and cleve:rly -to:t:d a s:torekcepez, a·c -U1e compound, ·'.:,o ope:.1 a oon~c::iner. Indeed. tl1e containr containecl motor cycle. .1.'b.e:-a:_:.,pclla.:J.t poifiJ~ed at: a r.io'..o:::- .;:,cycle saying ·fr,a-:.: it was the one U'..at beJ.o;.1gccl. ~o him (appellci1t) and one::whic.b. he 1-1ouJ.cl sell to ·::he com:)lainaii.·~. :ihe a,p)ell.:1,::.1-t.::.said-=- tha.t to onls meeded shs. J00,ooo/= .for it. &c coE1plai:,.ant parted with ·(;].is t:oney 2n Eichibit P1 shows g 2:i.e chit (Rii:11 oP1) reads: ttFrom Fulgence Basiri1aki '.i.10 llamran . Nimepokea shso 300,000/= lalci tatu }8ui:ok2, kwa Bwana HamI'an bia ajili Ye. kushug;iulikia pikipiki, liontla XL 400 cc, 1Z. 73417 a.mba:·o nimeitenda huko ELC'.1.1• Hara Bodi ya ·Lenda. ikimaliza kunikabidhi nLampat.iQ. yeye 11 signedn .. 2 In his defence r.t tho tr-ic-.1 9 tho ::p?ellent denied to t 2.ve boon involved in the commission of this offence. I:::o contended thr. t ho wcs out o~ "4 WJ~k 2,nd uo r;1ot the so,.rch pc.rty. Tllo;r t,sked him whether ho hed seen people rw.mine 'J.W2.y r:nd he replied in tho 2,Zfi:a.1::,tivo. \'TI.1ero upon tho s02,rch :Q,:.rty t·old hih1 thr:t he wc.s one of ther,1 c.nd tho;r c::c:rosted hir.1. I hc.vo oxm-;iined end considm:·ed tho cvido:1co 011 record. CG -:mll ns the nppellcnt 1 s petition of a.piJOP.l, lilw tho t:r.L·l court, I c.m sr.tisfied thd the conviction of tho
[1.ppollc:nt w:::,s prof,G:i'.'o IIis cuilt W8G ost2:1)licllod beyond renson2ble. The 25th hee,ds of cGttlo uoro duly identified to lmvo l:icon ;;icrt of PiB ts stolen' ccttlea And tho c.ppel12.nt 1-rn..s found with those co.ttle only e ·dny 2.f'ter they hc'.d been stokn. Tho o.ppellc.nt 1 s cccom1t th2,t the senrch pai"ty just picked on him 2.s he 1ms wnlkin( ntout cr:nnot be true end it wc.s ri{)1tly rejectodo The cpr,cll,·nt could not c.dvcence 2.1w renso:n r:s to wby tho som.:ch po.rty, in pcrticula1~, PW1 ond P!:72 could h~.v0 implicated hirn in this r.ir-.tter without cc.usoo .And f'tu:ther, o.cc0Td.il1r to tl:c tcstir:iony of PT-T2 tho nppelhmt when questioned by the soc:rch :p;:::]~t;r, he 2d.r::ittod to h2vo stolon the cnttle in question. This u:::;s ,:1 confesr.,iono The oppolli:nt did not che.llence this evidence c.t the tri21 1 tl·•.C't is, durinc the proaocntion ce.se c:s well ns in hie own defence. Ile is now tryint to I'otract or ropucli,-:,,to this confession in his petition of appec.1. E:c he.s st..::ted in his petition of appe:-~l thd ho adnittod to 112,ve conu-.1itted the offence to snve his lifo. r.:o 1-rnuld other-· wise heve been killed and left in the bush. I cm fer from boinc pursu.cdod by tho 2:.ppoll2,nt 1 s 1Jelr.tod sttenpt to '· inpet:ch tho ·confession he mndc o If indeed it hcd i)ecn obt~ined thrml[.h fo:::r nnd throats, I se~ no rouson why ho did
not 1~niso the issue of its involu:ntnrine:ss ct the trial. In o.y view this is but t:n nftor th:OU£.;ht on the pc:rt of tho appollo.nt and en nttempt on his pr·.rt to e::..t'ricate himself from this difficult situation., Tie h2.s not succeed., Thff conviction wns well found.ado Th8 sentence iraposed -:,;.s 9 yo::-~ro imp:riso1m.ent o There is no minir.rurJ. sentence set fo"J: offences undoJ~ the Econor;1ic and Orcnnized Crime Control Act. Tl~e max.imw:i sentence is 15 years imp:;_~ioonment. In ir.;:pos:inc tho sentence of 9 yccrs, the loc.rncd Senior Resident I:~rcistro.te 1 obsor<;ed thd the offence of cr,ttle theft w2.s p:rovelent in the areno .And thnt e. lot of :innocent lives of pooplc cs well c.s Government revenue is w2,stod in tho course of cc.ttlo rustl:inc nnd in tho 001,1.rse of try:i.n[: to prevent cattlo rustEnc in thd pert of tho country0 In ny viou those uorc pJ:Opor fr:ct ors to t--ko into account o In tho ci:i.~cumstr.:nces the:rof'o:i:·0, I o.:m of th0 view thd tho sentonco of 9 yo, 2'S w2.s7'tho circur.1stnnccs not so oxcor::;sivo to wc:rr.c.nt tho into:;: :foronce by this court. It is he1~ol:iy ·uphold. ~ .. ~=','. ;: ~(· ., .. ::~~·\. . .,. '. {'\ ·. ·-~~?- . -3 and ,,._,· ✓ This nppccl theJ:ofo~co fc:'1.ls/ in it is acco1"C!.int:ly d. iDsj_ssed· in its entirety., ;t~i -j. ,-t~~ . .,l!!,•'1i ~:f_;. i:- ..',':...·. ,,, 11. II o SEI:L'LE Ix ;:,;;\ Delivm~ed
on this 19th dny. of Api·il, MaleJ;}Shn lo8rned Sto.tc 1:..ttornoyo JUJ)GE t;};,>.~-,: 1 _, ... r;: ·~·, :r\}': . . '~1\i· . .1\1•. ~ ~:' l - ' 1 "jT .... ' \~ .' ........._':..,, \ ~ - >' \"_ :MW.A1IBA Ho SEI(ULE ·~:,e \" . 19/4/89 JL'DGE ·~ .t· ''.."'- :. ~1:--. : \,~; ... . -- ,, !'~ .~ ·•I'•; ~t•-.' : r \~~ .... . ,,.<._•""-\ ' ii . t.' ,. .. , : - .__ " c '\ t.., .,// - ♦..... , __ '~· · t! ;pr;"'
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.