g4s secure solutions t ltd vs enos frank kitomari 2021 tzhc 6519 10 september 2021

The application was filed under section 91(1)(a), not section 91(1)(b), and was submitted six days after the statutory period expired; therefore, it is time barred and must be dismissed.

Citation: g4s secure solutions t ltd vs enos frank kitomari 2021 tzhc 6519 10 september 2021
Parties: Applicant: G4S Secure Solutions (T) Ltd; Respondent: Enos Frank Kitomari
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 10 September 2021
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: application dismissed
Legal Topics: Revision of Arbitration Award, Limitation Period, Improper Procurement, Preliminary Objection
Source Language: English

Labour Law Revision of Arbitration Award Limitation Period Improper Procurement Preliminary Objection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

G4S Secure Solutions (T) Ltd

Applicant

Enos Frank Kitomari

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application for revision is time barred under section 91(1)(a) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act
2 Whether the alleged improper procurement justifies extension under section 91(1)(b)

Ratio Decidendi

The application was filed under section 91(1)(a), not section 91(1)(b), and was submitted six days after the statutory period expired; therefore, it is time barred and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

preliminary objection sustained
application dismissed as time barred