Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

geofrey kayanza vs republic 2020 tzhc 2058 18 february 2020

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Given the non-objection by the Republic and the statutory provisions, the applicant is entitled to bail subject to the conditions set by the court.

Court disposition

bail granted

Orders

  • Applicant to deposit Tshs. 3,600,000/- in cash or a title deed of equivalent value.
  • Applicant to provide two reliable sureties each executing a bond of Tshs. 1,000,000/-.
  • Applicant to appear in court on all scheduled dates in Economic Case No. 67/2019.
  • Applicant to surrender passport or any travel document to Principal Magistrate In Charge at Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court.
  • Applicant to report to the assigned Magistrate at Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court on each first Monday of the month.
  • Applicant restricted from leaving the jurisdiction of the High Court without prior permission of the assigned Magistrate.
  • Bail conditions to be verified by the assigned Magistrate within 24 hours after issuance of the order.

02

Material facts

Parties

Geofrey Kayanza

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Ms. Deborah Mcharo

Amounts and remedies

  • Alleged Tax Loss: TZS 100,739,873
  • Cash Bail Amount Per Applicant: TZS 3,600,000
  • Surety Bond Amount Per Surety: TZS 1,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act given the charges and amount involved

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant prayed to be availed bail.
Respondent
The Republic did not object to the application for bail.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    court's reasoning

    Bail is a legal mechanism to ensure a person stays out of confinement while criminal liability is being investigated and determined.

  2. 02

    Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap 200 RE 2002

    Section 29(4)(d) and section 36(1), (5), (6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act provide for the High Court's jurisdiction and bail conditions in economic offences involving specified amounts.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Given the non-objection by the Republic and the statutory provisions, the applicant is entitled to bail subject to the conditions set by the court.

Obiter and limits

  • Bail is designed to guarantee freedom while criminal liability is being investigated.

Court disposition

bail granted

  • Applicant to deposit Tshs. 3,600,000/- in cash or a title deed of equivalent value.
  • Applicant to provide two reliable sureties each executing a bond of Tshs. 1,000,000/-.
  • Applicant to appear in court on all scheduled dates in Economic Case No. 67/2019.
  • Applicant to surrender passport or any travel document to Principal Magistrate In Charge at Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court.
  • Applicant to report to the assigned Magistrate at Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court on each first Monday of the month.
  • Applicant restricted from leaving the jurisdiction of the High Court without prior permission of the assigned Magistrate.
  • Bail conditions to be verified by the assigned Magistrate within 24 hours after issuance of the order.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 18 February 2020

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 18 February 2020

geofrey kayanza vs republic 2020 tzhc 2058 18 february 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY)

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.254 OF 2019 (Arising from Economic Case No. 67 of 2019 filed in the Resident Magistrate Court of Dar Es Salaam, at Kisutu) 1. Geofrey Kayanza ......................... APPLICANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT

RULING Date o f Last Order: 17.02.2020 Date o f Ruling: 18.02.2020 Ebrahim. J: The applicant herein has been charged with 13 others with three counts of conspiracy to commit an offence c/s 384 of the Penal Code, Cap 16 RE 2002; fraudulent evasion of tax c/s 84(1) of the Tax Administration Act No. 10 of 2015; and occasioning loss to a specified authority contrary to paragraph 10(1) of the First Schedule to and section 57(1) and 60(2) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap 200 RE 2002. It is alleged that the applicant and his co-accused persons conspired to evade tax by failure to pay import tax which caused Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) to suffer loss of Tshs. 100,739,873/-. At the hearing of this application, the applicantappeared in person; and the Republic was represented by Ms. Deborah Mcharo, learned State Attorney. Republic side did not object the application. The applicant prayed to be availed bail. Bail is a legal mechanism designed to ensure that a person who is subject to the strictures of the law stays out of confinement and his freedom is guaranteed while the process of inquiry into his/her liability in the criminal process is being investigated and determined. The offence for which the applicant is charged with havea value of Tshs. 100,739,873/-. The laws i.e. Section 29(4)(d) read together with section 36(l)of the EOCCA, CAP 200 RE 2002, calls for

the jurisdiction of this court to hear bail application for the like cases. Section 36 (5) and (6) of the same Act provides for bail conditions where the court decides to admit an accused person to bail. That being the position and pursuant to the above provisions of the law; and following the fact that the respondent did not have any objection on granting of bail to the applicant, I hereby proceed to grant bail to the applicant on the following conditions: (1) That theapplicant shall deposit in court a sum of Tshs. 3,600,000/- in cash as they are 14 people charged together (say Tanzanian shillings three Million six hundred thousands only) Or in the alternative shall deposit to the custody of the court, a Title Deed of the immovable property to the equivalent amount. (2) That the applicant shall be required to provide two reliable sureties who shall be required to execute a bond of TZS. 1,000,000/- each (say Tanzania Shillings OneMillion only)and shall ensure the applicant's attendance to court. (3) Thatthe applicant shall be duty bound to appear in Court on all dates that shall be scheduled by the Court in Economic Case No. 67/2019 pending at Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court. (4) That, theapplicant shall immediately surrender his passportor any travelling document in his name to the Principal Magistrate In Charge at Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court. (5) That theapplicant

shall report to the Magistrate assigned with the case at Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court on each first Monday of the month. (6) That the applicant is hereby restricted to move outside the jurisdiction of this Court (High Court) without prior permission of the Magistrate assigned with the case. (7) Bail conditions to be ascertained/ verified by the Magistrate assigned with the case within 24 hours after issuance of this order. Dar Es Salaam 18.02.2020 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code, Cap 16 RE 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Tax Administration Act No. 10 of 2015

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap 200 RE 2002

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.