gisaba chombo and 4 others vs republic 2021 tzhc 6051 18 august 2021
- Citation
- gisaba chombo and 4 others vs republic 2021 tzhc 6051 18 august 2021
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 18 August 2021
- Posture
- Consolidated Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 18 August 2021
- Posture
- Consolidated Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail in this matter as the value of the subject matter exceeds ten million shillings, the offences are bailable, and the respondent does not oppose the application. Bail is granted subject to statutory conditions.
Court disposition
application granted
Orders
- Each applicant to deposit cash of Tshs. 3,791,200 or surrender a title deed of equivalent or greater value certified by a professional valuer.
- Each applicant to execute a promissory bond for Tshs. 3,791,200 with two sureties.
- Each applicant to surrender any travel documents.
02
Material facts
Parties
Gisaba Chombo
ApplicantJames Philipo
ApplicantRebeka Luma
ApplicantRehema Masuka
ApplicantElias Lyalobela
ApplicantRepublic
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Nestory MwendaAmounts and remedies
- Total Alleged Loss: TZS 37,912,000
- Individual Liability Per Applicant: TZS 7,582,400
- Cash Deposit Per Applicant: TZS 3,791,200
- Promissory Bond Per Applicant: TZS 3,791,200
03
Procedural history
Posture
Consolidated Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail where the value of the subject matter is above ten million shillings
- 02
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicants argued that the District Court lacks jurisdiction to grant bail for economic offences involving occasioning loss to a specified authority where the value exceeds ten million shillings. They asserted their right to bail and stated they have reliable sureties and will attend court as required.
- Respondent
- The respondent, through State Attorney Mr. Mwenda, did not oppose the application, conceded that the application was properly before the High Court under section 29(4)(d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, and urged the court to grant bail in accordance with the law.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 29(4)(d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap. 200 R.E 2019
The High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail in economic offences where the value of the property involved is ten million shillings or more.
- 02
Article 15(2) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, 1977
Accused persons have a right to bail pending trial unless the offence is not bailable.
- 03
Section 36(5) and (6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap. 200 R.E 2019
Bail conditions in economic offences require deposit of at least half the value of the property or equivalent title deed, and the remainder by promissory bond.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail in this matter as the value of the subject matter exceeds ten million shillings, the offences are bailable, and the respondent does not oppose the application. Bail is granted subject to statutory conditions.
Court disposition
application granted
- Each applicant to deposit cash of Tshs. 3,791,200 or surrender a title deed of equivalent or greater value certified by a professional valuer.
- Each applicant to execute a promissory bond for Tshs. 3,791,200 with two sureties.
- Each applicant to surrender any travel documents.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 18 August 2021
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 18 August 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF SHINYANGA
AT SHINYANGA CONSOLIDATED MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATIONS NOS. 15,16,17,18,19 OF 2021 GISABA CHOM BO...............••••....••..•........ I ••••••••••••• 1ST APPLICANT lAMES PHIlIPO .............................................•... 2ND APPLICANT REBEKA lUMA ...................................................• 3RD APPLICANT REHEMA MASUKA.. I •••• II •• I •• I •• I ••••• I" I •• I" I ••••••••• I •••• 4TH APPLICANT ELIAS LYALOBELA 5TH APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC RESPON DENT [Arising from Economic Crime Case No. 21/2021 from the District Court of Bariadi at Bariadi.]
RULING KULITA, l.: This is a consolidated application for bail pending trial of the Applicants in EconomicCaseNo. 21 of 2021 in the District Court of Bariadi. According to the holding charge, the Applicants are charged with two counts to wit: stealing by servant contrary to the provisions of section 258(1)(2) (a) of the Penal Code, Cap 16 RE 2019 in the pt count. With 1 regard to the 2nd count, the Applicants are charged with Occasioning loss to a specified authority contrary to the provisions of section 284A(1)(2)(h) of the Penal Code, Cap 16 RE 2019 read together with Paragraph 38 of the pt schedule to and sections 57 (1) and 60 (2),(3) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap.200 R.E 2019. In all counts, it is alleged that, on 11th day of June, 2021, at Kinang'weli village within Itilima District, in Simiyu Region the Applicants being the employees of AMCOSdid steal or failed to discharge their duties in a reasonable manner that caused the AMCOS suffer a loss of Tshs. 37,912,000/=. To date, the Applicants have neither been committed to the Corruption and Economic Crimes Division of the High Court for trial, nor the Director of Public Prosecutions issued consent and certificate of transfer to confer jurisdiction to the District Court of Bariadi, hence the instant application for bail. This application is brought under the provisions of section 29(4)(d) of the
Economic and Organized Crime Control Act and section 148(3)(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act Cap 20 RE 2019. It is supported by the affidavities of the Applicants, sworn on 12th of July, 2021. On 18th of August, 2021 this application came for hearing. The Applicants appeared in person whereas Mr. Nestory Mwenda, learned State Attorney appeared 2 for the Respondent, Republic. Before hearing commenced, as the Applicants' Applications in Criminal Applications No. 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 all are of the same nature and originate from the same Economic Case No. 21/2021 this Court made an order for Consolidation of the same into Criminal Application No. 15/2021. Submitting in support of the application the 1st Applicant in a nut shell stated that, their application originates from Economic Case No. 21/2021 of Bariadi District Court which was filed on 28th June, 2021. He added that, he prays for bail at this Court as the lower Court has no jurisdiction to grant bail on economic offence of occasioning loss to a specified authority. Lastly the 1stApplicant submitted that, he has reliable sureties and that he will attend the Court whenever is required to do so. The 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th Applicants had nothing different to add than subscribing to the 1st Applicant's submission and contending that bail is their right. In response, Mr. Mwenda from the outset declared that, they do not resist
the applicants' applications for the reasons that the same are properly instituted at this Court under Section 29(4)(d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act. With this he was of the considered views that this Court has jurisdiction to entertain the Applications. As thus, he 3 urged this Court to grant bail conditions in accordance with the requirement of the law. This is the end of both parties' submissions. I have taken into consideration both parties' submissions together with the available pleadings. The crucial issue for determination is, whether this Court has jurisdiction to grant the Applicants' application at hand? It is undisputed fact that, the applicants' holding charge states the value in all two counts to be Tsh. 37,912,000/=. Again, it is not in dispute that section 29(4)(d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act Cap. 200 provides that the High Court has jurisdiction to determine bail when value of the subject matter is or above ten million shillings. I quote it bellow for easy of reference; - 29(4) After the accused has been addressed as required by subsection (3) the magistrate shall, before ordering that he be held in remand prison where bail is not petitioned for or is not gran teet explain to the accused person his right if he wishes, to petition for bail and for the purposes of this section the power to hear bail applications and grant
bail- (a) . 4 (b) . (c) . (d) in all cases where the value of any property involved in the offence charged is ten million shillings or more at any stage before commencement of the trial before the Court is hereby vested in the High Court. As correctly submitted by Mr. Mwenda, I am also settled in my mind that, this Court has Jurisdiction to entertain the Applicants' applications. For that reason and on the bases that, the offences the Applicants are charged with are bailable, they as well have right of bail pending trial of their main case as per Article 15(2) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, 1977 and so long as the Respondent, Republic does not oppose this Applicants' application, I accordingly grant this application. As the subject matter in question is valued at Tshs. 37,912,000/= and the number of accused persons/ Applicants is five, the rate of liability should be shared by all of them. Therefore, the liability for each accused person in monetary terms is that sum of Tshs. 37,912,000/= divided by 5 which gives to Tsh. 7,582,400/=. Section 36(5) and (6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act requires the Accused persons/ Applicants 5 ., (b) . (c) . (d) in all cases where the value of any property involved in the offence charged is ten million shillings or more at any stage before commencement of the trial before the Court is hereby vested in
the High Court: As correctly submitted by Mr. Mwenda, I am also settled in my mind that, this Court has Jurisdiction to entertain the Applicants' applications. For that reason and on the bases that, the offences the Applicants are charged with are bailable, they as well have right of bail pending trial of their main case as per Article 15(2) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, 1977 and so long as the Respondent, Republic does not oppose this Applicants' application, I accordingly grant this application. As the subject matter in question is valued-at Tshs. 37,912,000/= and the number of accused persons/ Applicants is five, the rate of liability should be shared by all of them. Therefore, the liability-for each accused person in monetary terms is that sum of Tshs. 37,912,000/= divided by 5 which gives to Tsh. 7,582,400/=. Section 36(5) and;-t6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act requires the Accused persons/ Applicants 5 or his surety to deposit cash monetary at least half of the value of the property (subject matter in question) or the title deed in alternative whose value is proved to be not less than that sum, and the rest half be executed by promissory bond. I thus proceed to direct the District Court of Bariadi to admit the Applicants to bail upon fulfilling the following conditions: - a) Each Applicant to deposit cash of Tshs. 3,791,209/-
which is the half of each accused's liability ln monetary terms. Alternatively surrendering to court a title deed of an immovable property whose value is equlvalentto or exceeds the above-mentioned sum. Value of the property must be dully certified by the professional valuer. b) Each applicant to execute a promissory bond in the remaining sum of Tshs. 3,791,200/= with two sureties. c) Each Applicant to surrender the traveling document if any. It is so held and ordered accordingly. ~ S.M. Kulita
JUDGE 18/08/2021 DATED at SHINYANGA this 18th day of August, 2021. 1iL S. M Kulita
JUDGE 18/08/2021 ~V.6
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.