grayson zacharia mkumbi mapendo vs republic 2019 tzca 128 15 may 2019

grayson zacharia mkumbi mapendo vs republic 2019 tzca 128 15 may 2019

The applicant failed to show that the intended application for review would be based on any of the grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, which is a mandatory requirement for extension of time to apply for review.

Citation
grayson zacharia mkumbi mapendo vs republic 2019 tzca 128 15 may 2019
Parties
Applicant: Grayson Zacharia Mkumbi @ Mapendo; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
15 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Application for Review
Outcome
dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Grounds for Review
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Grounds for Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grayson Zacharia Mkumbi @ Mapendo

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Application for Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for review
  2. 2 Whether the intended review is based on any of the grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to show that the intended application for review would be based on any of the grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, which is a mandatory requirement for extension of time to apply for review.

Court Disposition

dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed.