Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19830131 TZHC Tanga1

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found the complainant's evidence credible and corroborated by other witnesses, establishing beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant and his co-accused committed rape. The appellant's claim of betrothal and consent was rejected as unsubstantiated.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction and sentence affirmed

02

Material facts

Parties

Hajiali Ma

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Term of Imprisonment: 5
  • Corporal Punishment (strokes): 4

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant argued that he was betrothed to the complainant and that the sexual intercourse was consensual, not rape.
Respondent
The respondent maintained that the complainant was forcibly raped by the appellant and his co-accused, as corroborated by her testimony and supporting witnesses.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Penal Code sections 130 and 131; general principles of criminal law

    A conviction for rape requires proof of non-consensual sexual intercourse and corroboration of the complainant's testimony.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found the complainant's evidence credible and corroborated by other witnesses, establishing beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant and his co-accused committed rape. The appellant's claim of betrothal and consent was rejected as unsubstantiated.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • conviction and sentence affirmed

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 31 January 1983

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 31 January 1983

19830131 TZHC Tanga1

Alc 'A•

IN THE HIGH COEJRT OP TARZANIA

AT TANGA • ALIT 3tJRISDICTION I •" ':):3!.I• CIMIN.AIj. APPEAL Nd. '79 OF 1980 (originaioriminal Cse 'No. 191 of 1979 of the (District Court of lushoto District 'at Lushoto • éf ore: p 1 Z Kaga1i. Esq, District Magistrate .• JSj . HAjIALjMA. ............. APpELLANT (orig . Accused) Versus - THE REIJBrIC....... (Orig.' Proecutor) '.'i• CHARGE; Rape o/s 130 and 131 of the Penal Code • •. Cap. 16 Vo1.3. of the RevisédIws" JIJDGE,MENT Sisya J:1.' - 5 The ape1.1ant and two others .who have not app1e4. were; jointly charged with and convjcted.of Rape contrary, to' sèctithis' 130 and 131 of t1,., Penal Code. They were each sentenced to five ' years im&ivonment and four strokes of corpora]. punishment. ' -'5 - ')''' '• - t. ,±., - ije - ic, 'VOLU.11UUJ..Ofl, by .__ s '-'QUr. 'S A .._. ._ Jtgrvww-w1e upi.uulf - - -- ,._, -, ;• .L'.•. is now dfeain to this Court The appeal is against both conviction .nd sentence The riñc.inal - witnesst ' in C ''-- -- • the. case was undoubtedly, rI- -- _ '''- . • the VS - - 'f_f'; complainant herself, one"Zaka1i /o Sa]ehe (pwj), a 9teeiear old 1aSs She stated in her evidence that in the dead night of 4th November, 19791 she was accosted by the appellant While 8he- together with her two friends one of whom (pW5) gave evidence in the cases was on her way back home from a ngo&' Party. The appellant was accompanied by his co..aooused in the trial: These

appeared as - . 4 / 2 seoond and third aecu&ed He got hold of her and told her to accompany him to his home She turned down the proposal whereupQn the appellant told her that he Was taking her along with him in any event s tJp hearing this the other two girls, one of whom was PW5 1 got scared and fled: They left the complainant behind in the firm grip of the companions appeuant Thereafter 1 the appellant's moved in,' The second accused got hold of her other hand whereas the third accused took position behind her, In. a clear spizit of togetheniess the appellat n4 second accused began to pull, whereas the third accused pushed. he. up14l1,. and in the bush She t•ried.Lto cry for help but her voice was niitfled by the appeliant ThecOn1jnantto].d the Court that when they reached the hill top the appellant removed her underwear and the three persons, i 0 e. the appellant, th':ecord'andthi'daccused, took turns in being *timato with her the appellant being the first to do So While one of the three pers.qns was satisfying his lust the others held the complainants hthds arid legs to the ground. Thereafter, the appellant and his companions took her- to- -another"place, about mile away. While there each one of them rvished her twice Eventually the complainant was abandonéd in the small hours and in the .bush She sustai±iedirijiirjes in the assault and her dress Was torn She

1 nevertheless, pulled herself together and walked to the nearest village where' she reported the xmtter to a militiamari (pW2) and the village chairman (PW3) These village aithorities referred the matter to thez Police who then sent the complainant to Lushoto Governmeni Hospital with a pF 3 (Exhibit "B") and finally- arrested the appellant and his co—accused and charged them accordingly In his statement upon affirmation in his own defence the appellant stated -that he was 1 actually 1 betrothed to the complainant. The two of them agreed to marry on 3/11/79 On the material 3 4._ ni€bt et q pe anoo sud IAPTU iiet Dqq. no .txvtrttYCdmoo et. oq. tovoxdd o;equvuTtdmoo etq oq uMomi sum qutltaddu et. vqq'p.xoo3xuo.00uepTAo et no qnopotx eq uto j91 •OrLx. s £ios sTtT d0oo o. .at; TtT.X. petLIteT et. 9,noqo 9UTuTuTdmoo o8 .tt sT ejj 'ttT.X et .t poiX.XtU et tom &04.8 eoUeOp sTt TdwTS sc OH 'MOU uiuvostI i.ou seo:p .tiieddt e tteddt jo oted sçtu eouepTAe epuedeptzT .xeto q @qaoddns SVM aótzepçA iet punoj s - q. oq. uoçppt UI truq. ;c seuTM t st pedeoota Iscvw tc.zq- peuxtet et. uewpn peUôstJ st UI -EuT.aal. -Om 9X4 no pasnoot prçT4 put puooes tp 9 UM ot pepeoTlOo OH stVtJOTXi u -tppeM estioxnd oq. oqmolq qv stmu.sum ;Eastatt4 OT. UetM sum q.1014 , puv uo144s eOTtO eT. -t .TTtTdUtO3 t pepOT put queM Ott quttrfltdwooetq. StM ttj. po.t4s .utTToddttn. peuOT.selTh uetj urtt pe.sexxt put itto

ueiixti3tpa IG!I.t'I UOtqts aTiO et rt pe.XTflbeI StM Ot Tt.T PtO- 'xeAeMOt P. ?' ¼ett; STH exez 11p.s utuitIdutoo e puno axl uanq-aa spu •trçppeM at xOs otwiiq o. oq1ooq. pepe000xd put dn eOMOt UtUxOI PXITMO, tTO; -OX4 WJ .tITu Gxlq. queds üts 3I3tM etOL o. ttI1:t tp pee.xv tnua.a put peq1uoons.ueqq guls Sauom .utuptduioo 014 eàuis eoueppe sp tr peqvs uttteddt tj •- • S ç t st xet 6.uaç ptt [pa29v axt 4xia,to ;o pun;ez t papututep et sp. uToas UØ !tUçT2( 14t/A 09 O. pesnai 4aaAamOxI 4 quLtLuTdmoDi 014 O8tS V ''owoT st O UtTiTtTdUIOO et, ert. WTT. cIet o. pagnoov prç14 put puooe& $14 pq4slq - axT .XGAO SVM xt tiUOtX o14 ie;t I OTA4. pto. .uttteddt et !srçj tIou 11 at qptw pTnoT.s £e14 4t14 peçdea: q.UVUTUTdmOO o' •euxoo ptt (,q.tTu T StM o) iVvp U-çpp9M.I9I4 .rq VevuTaoa u014 . eH Axt2 11 =2TIll 014 t *.UtUTtIdIIOO 014 1.9m 0I fl C ] '1 0. j pataijuoo Aqeet 'Jt uoçtuujuoo e.xtlbo.xpesnoot pi put PU,7, T4Q pe9odur eso. put 9 .X9A9MOH '-1 t.TM 9IOUT 0f. asodoad qou op O3Uue9 PPS PT4 OOUTS etj.xaAeu I Opts OTU 9t1I 110 SLI9 90UU9S pttS O. oavo ttq. jo saouL4 mnoa.-co 014 wr put rnjut ST tentooq uosxed AOriT Lxet paaaa . oq. onto stt .T1tTt9ddt 014 kcs ? I -[Tv '.xepuo;;0 q-s.x; t 1fl014 , U09 04. RUTUalIl .P ,Eqi1q.dn.: a_-IOq ST GMVS 914 put ptmOs Sfl14. et 'eoueppootqpo. 10 put IuopuadmpuT Rq petroqo.zoo Artrt.stM UtUTfUXOD 014 q uoAg ios ot. 9,urrq. po - ts Tat I itT.Iq.

patI.1tOt. 914 9ITI t a3u3pA03T.fl. ;o tX0T.tflTvA9 .CW U 'eetoq o q.xno e pOAOI 0Att PIfl0M 9t S't .I9LflV.1 .10 pequ.s. uIteddc 014 St OT.IJttU ° H UOT euop,, 9.IOUT t 0.1OTa tnm txeeq eAtq flr 4.ZeO sTL1U j.Ua.xo putt. UVUTtTdUIOO 914 tOTtA%.: OOT1OTJ9dX9 6ill. f,pbapuf Iotquç strkk umoP zeq put pootq tn.TM petrt4s StM .It0MI9pT2fl zot st14 0 uotq.tppt u •e.I14dtU .tet put ttrtt 314 optsTlt upoeq sn;otd VM o.xou aoo.nq aetl uo sestruq oIt aIott pesttuq 9.1GM tUItA .iet ,o SITVM 014 tLj PIAOtW tT0ttM iJcT 914 peULXu0C 4.1O4.S 914 0 094SV 110 UOTsaaA Uttb,,Edm,60 ota :w14p e.xno.xe.0 tn.ePVti 3T .0U .10 10140t ALs.'.I9&GMOt r.ou pTtp •3UT0T u 014 4uedstzttxtidutoo at:4utIieddt Q140. tr!:plo0o Oaaxl pa.eTeq tIte.te&ernj ets l-v14 ODUapTAG .ta trç pet çj 'putt .1oTq UtUTtIdtUOO e14 ;Q. ptot utitIddt eiqq. mus es qv14 palt4s 0tM çi. Xq ,peoqo.zoo. . ,.... '.XOAOMO4 'StM 39t0 914 30 ad9t sT14uo uoTs,X9A suvwctdttoo.. 9 t14 PTUS .1t 014 $VOl9M tI0tA StM ( tot)o.1cIdt o14 qXqqw, ptS. , - XOMaOJ 11 ..t[OtO.Iddt:0 •epOUI at.s .tjjp. . . 1 .tttddt 014 put .TtUTt1dUIQo eqq, qot uo utod £uo et 17 owp / r - J- -- 5. the final ëve ntV'this appeal fails and it1shereby dimtseed in its eitirety -- : De1ered at Tanga this 31st January, 1983 - Judge . I

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code sections 130 and 131

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.