19890622 TZHC Dar es Salaam2

19890622 TZHC Dar es Salaam2

The District Court had jurisdiction because the premises were service tenancy property of a parastatal organization, and JUWATA lacked authority to reinstate the appellant; thus, the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.

Citation
19890622 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
Parties
Appellant: Hassani Seseme; Respondent: TANESCO
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
22 June 1989
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Summary Dismissal, Service Tenancy, Jurisdiction, Reinstatement, Rent Restriction
Source Language
English
Employment Law Property Law Summary Dismissal Service Tenancy Jurisdiction Reinstatement Rent Restriction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hassani Seseme

Appellant

TANESCO

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the District Court had jurisdiction to hear the suit regarding premises allocated to an employee by a parastatal organization
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was unlawfully dismissed and entitled to reinstatement

Ratio Decidendi

The District Court had jurisdiction because the premises were service tenancy property of a parastatal organization, and JUWATA lacked authority to reinstate the appellant; thus, the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Appellant to pay costs