jamal msitiri chaijaba vs republic 2020 tzca 1774 16 september 2020
The applicant failed to demonstrate that the intended review is based on any of the grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, thus the application for extension of time is devoid of merit.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- jamal msitiri chaijaba vs republic 2020 tzca 1774 16 september 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Jamal Msitiri @ Chau A B A; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Review, Technical Delay, Grounds for Review
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jamal Msitiri @ Chau A B A
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to apply for review
- 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable ground under Rule 66 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to demonstrate that the intended review is based on any of the grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, thus the application for extension of time is devoid of merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment