19940110 TZHC Dodoma
The President does not have unfettered discretion to remove a civil servant in the public interest without giving reasons. The test for public interest is objective, not subjective. Failure to give reasons violates the right to judicial review and natural justice under the Constitution. Ouster clauses cannot prevent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19940110 TZHC Dodoma
- Parties
- Plaintiff: James Funke Gacilo; Defendant: The President of the United Republic of Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff entitled to present claim in court; ouster clause declared void; requirement for reasons in public interest removals affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Public Interest Dismissal, Natural Justice, Ouster Clauses, Right to Reasons, Unlawful Termination
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Funke Gacilo
Plaintiff
The President of the United Republic of Tanzania
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the President can remove a civil servant in the public interest without disclosing reasons
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to review the President's decision under the Civil Service Act and ouster clause
- 3 Whether the test for public interest is subjective or objective
Ratio Decidendi
The President does not have unfettered discretion to remove a civil servant in the public interest without giving reasons. The test for public interest is objective, not subjective. Failure to give reasons violates the right to judicial review and natural justice under the Constitution. Ouster clauses cannot prevent the court from reviewing such decisions for legality and compliance with constitutional rights.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff entitled to present claim in court; ouster clause declared void; requirement for reasons in public interest removals affirmed.
Orders
- Declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to present his claim before the court.
- Sections 5 and 7 of the Pensions Ordinance declared void as unconstitutional.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
4,T DQDO)~ CIVIL C&.s:E: 1TO. 23 OF 1993 ---- llUL:ClTG The :r;ouc:i:' of the President of the Uni tod l¼pu1,lie of 'l's.nzania. to ~emov~ e. civil. servant f'.;.•on1 so:.'Vice in putlio int.e:i:est i:i bei.n.e; ohallGl1£ed in this case. Z10 g_1,1.cstion ic d~es the ?.c"ea:ld.en"\ hu the authori v t¢ ."eL1ove sooeono il'l t!1.0 i,1,1.1)1io service in r,t.t1;lio inte,:ost with.out tliselo~s ,lhe.t tl'l.S.t p,u.1::l:i.o interest is? UJ:l.dc.1: .h1i of the.Civil. Sernoe Aot ~9• ,16/1~92 it .is F¢dod: 1Tb.e President r11cy remove a, oivil servant from "the sai.--rloe of the Ae1JU.blic if he oonsidGrs it in tho :pu"Llic into:~ost to do so' The issue is, a.a what is in pu1'1io intel"ost is the word of the ~osid.$1tt. f'ine.J.? In ~ th.er t-rords in deoidinc z.s to ,motho:r the (l.eeision ":as in pt.1blio interest, ·ub.at test to a:.,;oly, a subjective i:ast o:t: an o'bjecttve 11 test? 'llie Sta.tE> A.ttoi-ney "r• NyalJiri :1s.s •a;r~ed tI1e.t the test is sul.:;jective end so the dooioion of tho 12:::-esident cti,nnot be questioned. il-1 couxt. T'..iex-o is anoth03: ~uestion c.s to 11hethe:i:' this cow.'t hc,,s j~i.sdiction tQ inqw:r-e u.s to "lrhe:th<ar the })l"esident oor.1:pliad ·with the lcw: Und.el' s. 23 (2) (a) of the Ci-r...l Service kc~ No., 16/1589 it is ~--ovided: t Ti.1.'c q_1..1.cstion 'loi.1.ether the ~"0sidcnt h.2..s Yalidly i,e.i..-formed a.nJ7 ft,nction undor ttis k,.ct.. shall not 1:e ili,q_ui:;:-ocl. into '1_;.i oi- in ~-.:.1:,. eot.U't 1 ,, Re,ve tl1a co-u:rts bean :i:-end.ered ioroten1' 1i th6.t 1-irovision · oustin[~ the j~isdiotion of the courts? TJ.x,so ~"e the questions {..~> I b.c.'"'Ve :~een invi tcd to answer in t::d.s oa.se. The ?laintiff in this c~sc is~ se~soned civil se~-~D.llt ·one 1-a'. James Funke G,c,:;ilo uho until 15~h 1-fuy, 1,9n un.s a. Rec,ional Dowlopmcnt :nirecto:r fo:i:' Ts.1,;.o:ra lle{.ion. Dy a lette:r da.tcd2Sth Dccemtier, 1$$0 he was info:i.'tlod iJY the ,;.ri:ncipal SocJ:"ei;&y (:Ostc.'blishoent) that r. -. ,_ o • • / ... ,:.: . .. o ~·· • • • • ... 2 ~etd.cleut ~ s. 19f3) of the Civil Sex-vie~ Aot. No. 16/1S'J9 .and. s. 8(f) of tha ~ O r d i r l ~ eep. 37~1 a.nd Stand.inc Or~ JI.JS ha.s dil'eoted that you are retired :e.~om the. puclio ~ ~ public interest \lith effect from 15th l<~,,., 1990 1 • No reasons were .d.:i.seloee4 u to ,~t rendered the reti:i:'emont to be of intez-est to tho ~ c ' " 11;'<,;-. lloUliWe:r:- ~a lcr•~ ~tocr tlla.~ tlY.:. ro,ti,re,d. ~ " ' t , would. be paid all l' i.P pension due. Now the said -plaintiff hes filed -. sw. t foi, a deola.;;~,tion thct his retirenent in pul:lic in½erest 1ms 'l'JToncful. Ile preys to be d.6Cl~ed as still a le,;wf'Ul employee of tl". .e Gov~nnc::nt. IIo olaios Ghs.47,559,511/60 as deJ'lc~~~ for wroncf'ul rctirc□ont and his o;:.•rc~s ef sa.J.a;cy- end. 0th.CJ.~ aJ.l,owa.nccs that !10 was cmti tlcd to. llo 2lso · ela:i.os Shs.157, 717,.644/60 as Sl)OOial dr.IJD,e;cs. Tho Govoi--noont t1::a.-oud1 tho State AttoX'llO:: l•i:.:-. Nya.'biri has 1,c.isod a. ~eluu.n~--y point to tho otfQOt that t~s eov.rt l'lS.S no ~isdio+,ion t. ie:7 tr.i,; ~ • ftcia • = tho 1;la.in'6.u11, ...,,..__,.;.;,. :.Us ~voo2,to Vu.,. ~ i c JTI::czi ha.s oontOlldod. that thi.s .cot.U'i! has ihc jurisdiction to ti'.'y t!:..o caaa. Fi.:i:-e, tho Ste-to Attorney lb:. Uy~bi.ri ha.s ar{;UO(l. that tho -~r.cs.idcu+. und,or 4',rt. 36 (2) of tho Cons-ti.tu.ti.on has the pr0J:'OG~tive J,?o·wc:ir to to:rJ::inc.fo "·c 3.'CI'.ovo ;::, ci.vil so:.:-v2,n+. in tl10 public sCJ.---v.t,.eo. in pu1)1io interest. Uo acid that powor is supplor.antcd by the Govo:;:,nnont Stand..i.nc Ora.or F.3$ wllic!~ states that a. civil sorvant holds !:is office at the ploa.suro of t2.,o !'i-~:ddent as SD ho cc.n be dil!ll'~eso.d. ~t KL.Ua Cowisol for the J,41inti.ff hr. 1-Ibozi hc.s ric1,lt;cy-• p('.lin:t~d: ~t.,.~""'~ o.e:.."'l.~oc-t S.:tandinc 0-.::a_o:i., L,s F.44 which etctos that a civil sel:V"cl11.. holds his off'ioo ct t!lo ploasuro of tho l'l'csidont. I will '·0 -:_•-_; " 1: to 1)oint 01..,.t t:.c:t t:10 St2,ndinc; Oxdors ~rwo no force of lau. T>oso sk.nclinc o=:a.o:cs have 1:ooa ~~t'le:3- by ~10 J;)?O"V_?-Sions of t:::..o Chril Sorfico ll.cto Ne. 16/1989 Gl'ld t:.lc Consti tutio:n.. Tho Stc.:.1.(.inc O::·du:L's :i}:::il v~~lidity only cl'\..U'il.1{; t:.10 coloiliol ::;io:;.•iod. u;:,.Q11 t:~.o Oj:o,m ooiu.d cl.is:·iss a oivil so:::v2.nt ct ltlll as :10 ho}ioffico c.t t.:w :,:.l .... ::.:::"1:.:·o of t~ .c C.;. 01m- 1 0 ilJ.~on Tel1, c:.:.pko,. 'boccno a ·l.oJ?u1:lio in 1962 tho J:l'.i:'Roc_,a:ti,.., J.· , ..,;,~• , ·~ ,-.:·.0 C:rc.1m to disniss a civil so1·v2.l1t at will G.id :.1ot cvolvo to t::.o Prof'lic.ont. I~ tho P:rcsidont could cnly ror:ovc c. civil so:::v2nt not at will tut in JlU1:lio into:i.'Ost c,s :;s::;· 20 (:::,) of t:·,_o Civ:i? S~rvit10 0rd.in..u"lCO C2,:p. 509 of 1961. Tl'L:t'Ofo:i.:'o tho D;:-oroc·divo fo d.isniss c;t will has t;101.•ofo:..•o 1)co11 n.1Jroo~.:tod. ~s l:-rof. A~::L'o; r1:1 Kiapi points out in ~-:is ~)oolc , --. -- 3 tlho ~ to d.1~1iss ·can •nly iJC oo:rorcised it it is in the ~lie in~o~t. 'Xb.orc is a. distinction totwoon. this. on'i.:, ~ ~ 'to 4i-~ ,aa, ~t -11Ul ~4isabl"' :.y iiho" 'C:t'o~m'. ·in ~ o~ t~.:.G l'l·csidont in U,:_;.:i.n~ Whereas under '£he prerou:-.tivo the Crewn nood not stz.to w.v an officer is 1:io:'..llt; a!tr,isdod: ~ ,: . no owso need bG shown for tho diacha;rc;o • undGr tho 'l'r..nzn.ni~ Aot, tho f;;;'osidont rust a.ct if the -ltf, S~~~ re1uiros. Thero t:ust exist sor.ie- eu-ou- 1'.:fl~ ~ cm:l;~ ~ pc:ci,l .--4! • ~ --t;;he 9P::ini,,oft 't.b..o,t the ror.oval. of. c.'ll offi.tl'Or is in tho pu.1Jlic interest. 1 In toot ,4.?t 36 ( 2} of ou:r 1977 Constitution w!rlch the State At t ~ ha.a- ct,to4. r ~ o s tho view that tho :!Tcsidcnt he.a no power to disIJiss the civil soNrnt at will, eont·ary to w'.iat tho Stc..ndiJlG fl:d.or ,Pl'Ovido. Tao .A.'r-t. 36 (2) of tho Constitution cloo."f:ly p:;.¼vidcs t~at the tresid.ent has no i1olrer to terr.un:-,te or l'et1ov~ sooeone in ~ ~oat. qs,e~l j,aa. tJ-.a ~~cl.~ ·d.th the- 14,-•v,i.Qio:;& ef tb.e Oonsti tution or the lmr of tfae l.:-.nd. : ::-~.- the only 12.,r availa1le fe:i: terLUlla,,tioJ2.. t0· .r,el;lO'Val in public. inte?est is the Ci'Vil Sei"V'ice ~ ll~ 16/1989. In t!le s~e 'brea-0:, it tlO~ 1:-c ef i.'1tere-st to note tile ohervs.t:i.o,l. ,('1{ P"i;o~. ~s.J,urµ in his. wok TIA,dci.cist:re..tion Law jn K~" 1ihe;re ai; r. 10 st~tes: 'It wow.d then follow thc.:t "WXO;t(;"ful dist1issal would be ~6Mtiy~ \;\,S o, bl'or,o!l of contrrot of er.:ip).o;yuent •. In Iteey~ neither the Consti tLi.tio·n no~ the· ree,ulction p~ov:i.de fo~ dietti.ssed .:.t :.lecsu::>e 'by t~e .President or the iu,~lic Service OQ..'1.'ilission, only termnation of ~poil1tuo.nt ,tn the n .... , · --- · ~lie inteJ..'est; 't!lis is Va:t"'IJ de:ff'e:cent fi'ou dis...'!iss~. It 'ROi'!ld. SQerJ to foJJ.ou tb.erefo?e that th~•e is. ••.: :;;::·or,e:i:' cont~tu,cJ. :i:'elatip~ s~.1il? bet·wee11 t4e Ken.r-a Go~noe11t 2nd -tlle se.:..~. · ·:, r--.e in ,l:dch, it is t-\.i_e, cll t:.1e cads are stack, d on one side, ~.::ut tb,t is· not t.1n0or..;.i;t1on t:;_0s~ c.cys and .it :re:;p:-esents a step fo::-·;;ia;:d :froo the colo;1icl r•esi tien". -. I hope by now t'.he Ste.ta Atto:;:-ney r:0.-. l:ye,~ i:d has under: ·:..·:1.. -~11::;.t the Government Stand.inc Ch'ciers do not :rer,z·esemt the tcu.e st2.:te of tb.e lc:w. Kr N'ya1,iri "\i8.S .:-J.so e;_t.tl te -wronc to tt:ifiR1.c ..4:i,_,jLrt.JJ.0--u:c;a.n l_~, oesc o:f' O'J?tlloto ws. UcCJl~~ ( 1969) F.~rai,jefl.iji;i;s i•i-o~. ·\,Gvniis :t5.v• ·t.--i:·''1x)"s:i.tion of tho:f.2,w. T',1c.t case ~:i.eld :tr:.o.t tl::.ce Presiclcnt o'f 'TJ.::,cnd2, :.1c.rl the 3101,0~~ to - 4 - o.ifJtti.ss e. oivi1 s ~ t at ~11. 'Xlla• is.~ l'OGi~ i . D , ~ llhw-e th\ Q~i,i.on of Uca.ad.a. stated ~ on the a:tvj tuneM o.f ~ =rta.w-cs,tbt ~ t i f l PQWers of· <the Or\)IKO was vested j.n the J'resid.q tf UG~ ~• il'l the 1977 ~ti.tution of Wanzania. ,re have 110 su.ol. 4='1 i&il>!Lt 'l'ht Jreaident of T~o.rn,a. has no ;prero6ative power 1Q d,.&n,,._._.._., . c ~ all will hut i~ tei~ins of J.,rt. 36 (2) of o~ Censti tution h(.t, ~ ~ -.z ··•;re J.11 'n~lll ~.\&ti fll'!iWc»· i.i,, a"9Qi[)rr~. 'rt t'1,J1t,e !:a.w '~d•.-Civil Service ~t No. 16/1989. N'ow the next qUO,tion is a.a to 'Whether renoyal, 1na £i;tbli;. .J..Bt~ u-.»r41 ~~•,ec0:i.na!~!" at <the wilJ, of t~ f;;;!!_ij.eni,- The a.newer is an emphc.ilc no. As Pl'of. Ab:ailaIJ Kiapi ri01tly points. out in the pa.ssa,:,e I have quoted a1.~ovo, u}icJ:cas in tho terninat:Lon a.t will the Cl'own need ~ot show tho cause for the discharGe, und.el.' ou; la.w the l'resident bust etate wha.t the intcreEJt of the public is beins se,:,ved. To quote hie ~ 'l?lei£t uwru ea,1, s2me g;,~s1D~ 4 ti enable the 1'resident'. tQ ;fon:"; the opinion that the removal of an o f ~ .,. -= ,. mo O • a • .__ ~ • .,,._.,... __, ~- .., • •-,.,... .,is.ia_,R!,¼'tlio intercs~•, Tho I'res1dcnt cannot .::.nd should not ~ of the 'blue, state thd he was reao-nnc; soraeone in pul1 lic inte:t"est ;dtJ,m1ot cliBQloflinc the ;interest of the public to be served. Otherwise he will be ~ - . Q . t a a ~ .sl."bie~ au'l. .i,.n .a. b.ich-,handed oanner. In other 'WOrds it 'Will be an a.~J\:l,PSe o:f :powe;r. The duty to cive reasp~s by the rresident when renoving sot.wane in the eivil s.ervioo- in _l,'Ublio il:\~c:Gt. ~ ~ ~ , ~ · pr-evision of J,rt. 13 (6) (a) of our Constitution. That pL9Vi&ion . states that every pc~son who,e ric;hts and oblication a.re being dcteroined by a, J?Ublio offiper, has the ric;ht of appeal or the ri(,'llt t(i .,an2ther ret1ec},Ya[;ainst 'ij:Lat decision. Dy the phrase 'another reoegt there is ~fflsa[;ed the riJit to judicicl review. nut there oa.n be no judioieJ. review if .th~ ~<1,aj.sion-maker he,s not Gi,ven tl1.e reasons for his decision. .A.s Lord. Vpjohn , o'iservod in the case of l'ad.t'ield V-:cs ' yuni!ter of ..42"i~s.JiP.!ries ~d...Food! (jj68),A.C 1 · 927 .et P• 10d' ••• if 4e doe~ !\(:lt cive mw reason for his decision a cowt m~ te at liberty to cone to the conclusion the,t he .h~ ~ good reQ,Son for rea,cltlnc; that conclusion t • No dou'J;k the absence of ~a.sons WO\.Ud render the constitutional rigrl; t.o E'.lJ;,,;dl c,r judicial roviGw ineffectivo ,~.ncl illusory•Consequently there i.s en ira:plici t o"blic;e.tion to e;ive l'ec.sons in 01•der to faoili tate ,;:,nd .t'e11der mea.nine,:fl=,l the exercise of tb.a ri()lt ~ ~pea.l and judicial review. Our Constitution iu J..z-t. 13 (6) (a) r.iust ha"1e i.i:.~nded tl1e - 5 o~tu:t..i.~ ~i)1t o'f .;.ppccl r.ncl ju~licicl review to b~ @ off~ti"'l3 richt ancl th.at tho J.>..i!'csic'.ont by kocvinc silent e •.nno-t d.cfcat iho citizQn. 4 s oonstitutional ric)it. To holcl cthorwiso woul<l nor::j;l th"-t tho Prcsic!ont oov.l,l in r-J.1.:ost every ccsc, ::.'end.or tho ric;lii o~ C...'"'-!"~ e:.nd jw1.ioic.1 roVion cor.ll,)lotoir nuc;a.tt:il.'7 - soo tho ckicisiot c.>f tho 1tr.i.V Council in tho cc.so of ,W.:Jietot .9.,f'.P£-~i_cnci,:l:_~."vo~~ U,. Z:,"111'6. C i 8 ~ ~iJ f;i'-!!.. 1 .124~0• 192, ct l)• 123 .:If ron.~iiG N."O not civcn for a. clcci si0n by the :P:.. c si:lont thct will ronc-er 1 -y vi.rtv.c.lly 1 iJ::rpossiblo for t:ho c-:.,wts tc, por-fo1i:.1 thou funotion of fclicia.1 ~cvio'lt9 If the bo.sis rJ1c1. roe.sons fo1 the, ir~J?ucncd c1.oci~itin c.1 0 »ot az-ticuJ.:_,,tQd 1 1 it is lifficul t fer a, :i:'oviowinc, c urt to <':,(1.ju,1-Gc thi _vn.li,1:i. ty of tho ,1.c.cision,. n:io oouzts C2l'Ulot o.xcrc:i.so th-:;i;( -~uty fo fovie,1 unless tllQy aro ~vised of tho C".';nsi-:1.cretions u.n1_cr],yll'1.:_; tho ~~on unr~or 1·ovicw. Thv..t is tho oorir..r:m lc,w :i."Ulo 2.lso c,ll ovor: tho Cort."Om·roal th - see thc,_,M?!,.ttor pf.,/.J-1~ f.CW: U8£i ~ ..~~~.:._Cggl Oovvl'l;:;on~ - ln M1·TO,ll2ia Rich Cou:ct. Misco Civil Ct.$> H-o., 9/t98S; PnC'. ,,£.sr.L5-Y1•~_J?u,1>]it SS::~ J3oart1t i ·1985· ll.U..0. {Oos-t.) -+o41 ".Jy CQ)U't of 1..m,on.J. of Now South W.-.J.os ( ~ - - , ) . 1.u1.othc.:r l 02.scn fc:,:..· :i.·cq,.u:d.nc t~acloS't,1.j;'o of :r-oc.sons for 1 :t>,ctii'inG in public intcX'o.at, is to 0118\.,;;:o p:coroi:' C,l"l;lic;:,,tion of r.ll.?lGt to z-cr~uce tl'lc ~ : i ~ -,..1 -c.'-SU~~ AA&.; •tb'bwiua-.• in. briE)f iie> tl.Wl~ -.iho intoc;,.'lity 0f t!io (~oc..t~ ;-J,-hle:: !...,-,~~oss,.. Th~ OoJlI)ulsioxi. Q;C c'.,;lsol.psµj:o of tl10 vV.1)lic intc:;:ost 'involvoc'l.• · G'Ua:i:'~ eonsicler,:tion ,~.nd ·intl.'oclJJ.oes clnri t:7. Jlf rocs,ns f'oI' an ~d.or ~ given ty.oro will be less scope for O:t"bit,.,~y- or r,r.:..·ti~.l *rcJ.S:0,.: of Dowers c'.l'lc1. the o.t'c!ot' o~facio ·will :iJ.1::.i.cc.~ who~ ~c.rwous J>i5:'cuns'~~ooi:; l.,J01lo t.d.co.."l. il:tto ccinsir~J:::tion by the :rr-osic:cnt jn rc<',Clune his cloQisione T'.ao.t uiJl be G11 offc.ct:j_vo ~cst~n.int on e,1.,'i.lsc of 1~owcr, In a//',.i tj.:::.n to inposin[:,' 2, hoc.l thy c1.isciplino on tl:o c'l.coision-r.1clta...i,. lll.W~iD C'.)nfL~ in tb.o c1.oc~.sion--r:1ckinc 1-,rccoss is b~oodey· tho l0101rloc'-:.o thd r,eccptr,1:;lc :rec.sons h<'.vc to .be :'. i vcn 1:iy those ,-rl.10 GXOj,'Ciso · u1l::inistrc.tivo poucro Dosic:'..os ovon if tho (1.ocision ia adverse, tho 11_0:L·san o.ffoct:::.cl ncy -:~c c Jl1Vinccc'!. by tho :.. O2,sons ta 1 1 c.cccpt j. t as 2. :,:,02,so112.blc c..nc'!. fci.:i:' c:zor-cisc of c1.iscrction.__..ry j)01·rcr. 1.i.nothor ir.l;.)o::-tr.nt c-:·nsL:o:o.··.tLm w1:.:0rlyinG tl-:.o :i.'oq_ui::·or:.1ont ✓ to rive rc2.sons c.s to 1fl.'Jr t":. sc~.'Vc11t is :rcp:)y;~ in pu1.~lic intc:;.;ost, is to s;:-.tisfy u ~)r,,si~ nooc1. fo:..• fcir plc.Jr. L. ,:;;iorson dfoctod by an o.:.lvorso oi•clcr is c.n~Hil.ca to know ,Jl;y tl:.c clccision ho.s e;un(;) a,.0 r,inst , , ..... ... ~....... . ;, 6 ... hi.a or hor4 Wh:.t ia. l.1'0QUil'od is not c dotai.lcd Juc1.[)llont but o. 'b:~iot and e ~ e~temcnt of reasons for tho oil.verso dcoision. Moreover tho oblication to civo 1,cmsons, our Frcsic1.ont should note, elso flows n:-om tho oi tizon' s riGht to know r-.ncl tho riGht to ht1No inform~tion w!l,ioh is an esscntin.1 oonr~onont of tho freedom of svocch we ◄ @d_grp?;2,ss~on B~entood undor .A,rt. 1D of oui, Constitution. The supremo Court ot IndiA ~ -t:llG .eMO- o.f. ~•l• .iUB,ta y;:s. Union of India& f 198.2) 4,r.4s. !s,o,) 149 doolerod t~1.o ri(J1t to know from tho e;uar~ of ft-oo speech in tho Inrl1o.t1 Constitution. I ndopt thn.t reMoni?l(;• Thus the rights to h2.vo inform~tion obli{;os tho President e.nd other .au:tb.~1.l-1.iil.S, ;to ..cliscl~ r.casou f.Qf t!.:..o~ docisions 'ttli-oh a:ft'oa1, .oi~•• · · ri(;hts. It can bo sro.d lr.i.th oonf'idcncc thc.t since Art. 13 (6) (c) of O\U" Cbl).s:ti.tution i;:l~ovidcs for the ric;:ht of 2-:;_;j_)oal r.nd ridlt of judioicl :i,oviou fl'om ovory decision affcotinc ~5.th;on' s ;;;iel1ts, then iI'so 1fr.,o~s · itoroe:tos a. thi:.d hcncl of tho prinoi:ilos of n.:~tu;cru. justice ro.nkinG Gqu.aJ.Jy- ~th c.ucl:i, gltara.m ~01:tem. (tllo r:L~t to bo hce,rd) and :.:,emo.. Jw-9.i in suo. couse. ( tho l 'Ulo a[,cinst 1Jias). Tlu.:s ~ d . hea.d ii, tho ~i&ht ~ rc2.Sons from a clcc:i.sion-m2kor - th.::.t it is a clcnic.l of natu:2cl justice to refuse to civc :.:oa.so:1s to tl:o J?C-"-'t✓- 1i::o lost. Thus the thi:i:-d. pillar y,:t the :p:rinci:;.:los of n · tural justice is 110::0 to stey just c.s clc.y follows :ri.;l:lt. In order tho.t it l)o at no c'.isnclvc."'l'tego in point of latini ty1 this third o.i."""Ill of the p:d.ncip;os of m~·G\l2"r.J. justice, sh.ulcl be rc.foc.Tod to a.s nullum arbi ttJ.~ium sine ro.tioniou.s. So the Ste.to Attorney M:r. Nycl:L.""i ,ms l'lrone cs wa.s tho !'1'csic1.ont to oquc;to rolilCTaL in. l]lll:lli.c ~tol-ost witli i:Qr~tton at tho Pi-osit!ont 1 s will inr pleasure. T'.aore is a. -vc,st diff02cnce 1)otwoon the two as o.d.UJll1)ra.tcd above. Tb.en Council for tho .Republic 1,J;;:,. Nyabiri e.:i:-g,icd t~i..."'..t it is for tho President and not tho courts tc. detc:rn:i.no wha:t a,m'.)uniis to py'blio interest. He acid tb.~t the docision of tho rresidont is subjective and tho.t is wby tao lecislr,;tion in question st~tcs th.,t 'if tl;.o I;'oaj.clent oonsido::cs it 1 -be 1)c in pt,t1)lic into;:"cst. So he scid thr.t tho words used ruts it cloe.rly tho.t it i~ cntu-oly ;y1 .-the discz-otion of the ~~csiclont to clotcrmi:ne 11hotho:;;- c pn:rticiiJ.n:r c1.ocision is in :p'Ublic int~ost or not,. I I 2.m quite catain thc.t tho Stn.to Attorney is wronc• In mr,ttcrs of this kind fue tost is an ol:,joctivo test and not o. SLJ.b~cctiva t0st. A similor ••••••.••• /1 •••••••• -'l J • I ... ~. .esion was oonsL'.ence 1:iy the faJ:1:;;al1ia CoUl't of Apr>ea.l i.n ~- cl etl:'ies Lt(l Vrs. ·tto1~ : Civi. /:.. (:osll) ;f)Jatfe .~1.clo,1cnt was clelivere~ on 23/ 4/ 1s9). lffiat w~• -~ 'i M -n-c3.;& t:ie p:rovtsion in e.10~ (2) "i? tho L6,nt • 0~,1J.na1V)I Onp, 11) w~o1;l 1 ~~ ., lfo~ ~--, ...uiW~· H ...,.. ~ r . ' ! i,.i..a ...o 9~ ~,;;tlQO~Oll t 1) ~ •►.• ... : ~ m.:y rpvoke .::;, :c:i£;ht of coou:~:::..~ , , , .. . t . t _, •£• .,1,n W.A. or,il'l1C'ltl. ..... ., ·. ~ in tLJ.~ pu,, ...io intore.s so o ,.o. :tn tha:li case the rcvDor,t:l.on of ril).1t of oocup~~y wm.s (lone by tl.e r:-:osiclent in ;f::,vour of a trcs1 ssOl' ( o. /Li.::lio COX).?O:i:'t,tio1t) C,Elo ll(~a.iNJ!f o. 12-w:rul a.mer ( a ::c~~:iva,t0 oonpi:.tfl,7). 'rho Te.nzanin. Court of A~po'11, o,e :per Rc$1ac.".' .ruli :r•.t.. helc'\. tllct no twi th • -tMd.~1(~ tho rTO:t.'dil'IC sue'ce s tine . p - - ~ ~-~ ~ t~-tf;l-1,~-... ~~tc;a- .....,._~_ 0,)ieQ~ tcs~_ Ile s ..:dc.l e,t 'P'.P 1114 - 15 of the typocl ju,lcoont: 1 I:l:l t:.1e oyes of tho law ;,.-, t:i:osr ~sel" is a. tros1:>a:,jse:.: h'l it a J'.U1)J.ic ~e..""J?-"i:~ oz- e :pj,;·ivo.to enterp:dee o""J: a.n in~:.iv:l.c:u.al. So the c::ruci.,J. c:tU1Jet:i.on . 3.G w11at e,ctfo;;1 is iA tM public in.tere,:,bs to 1,.:otoot one with a lei~ title CJ!.· to protect a trespa.sser? "t:ih.;i.t ·16 .a.t &Jli~,4f,~-%ii~ of a. leGal ;.;J.fll,t, axu1. ~v.inin.3 the 1~isht to pro;.~ e,;..,hinSt the use of ual~ecl fm.'cc. Which of the two sho\.,,l.cl be p:.:·otooted. in the pu~:,J,:i..c intcx~-t? ff~ are satisfied that pJJblic inte1·est, as we h~,ve stc.~tocl t.o ~at.end ~ ~ 1hat lec;al pi,opcrty rich'cs shoulcl 1xi :Pl'Oteotecl a.ca.inst -fr;espae81"~ J,fulii.tec.J.J, tlui.t subs-GO-tio.n ~ov:1,.dG& a VQ.bjectivo test th0,t is: in the opin:oo of the -P..:>osic1.offi. ~tl tllis o<.1se that opinon ,rt.s 1'0,sec.l on the recommQru.:1.n.tionis of tb.e l'ol-1.0. wiuch clicl no1 closori'be D8.j.'1JJ."ew in its t:ru.e co~s t::t<;d; it was a t:~eSl)a.sser-e In fact fue F:i:csicle:n-1: wo.s ruslecl, If the J?:cesiclc:.1.t 1rc,s selzecL of the. :f\'!.ll o.nc1 com.;,eot $i -t·u.,.~tfon l1e wov.l~l not, in ow., O:':)inion, lv,,ve ucecl l.ij.s T.12r.1e to p:;:aotect c, t:::esr,csser c,r)eit 2, r1:l1J.ic ent01-v--,1tca., Tie wonlcl :J.z,ve 1_;oen of the opinion t)._;_2,t, T1...1e i;:1i:,ort.,nt point ;to ro~bex is ~.:.-1,t t:.1e T$.11zMia Cow:t of' 1..;:-l)co.l a:-. :)liGd iffi ;1:i~,78. tes-; des;,i t3 the uo1·~~ f.i' tho st1?.t\1.te in cruestfon. 11.:.J:,2,Cl.1'.2.li.i J .A. «l:I)h8.sizod. tl~.at ;ioint at ~- 12,.~1.-:, et~tinc: ' So whet J.o we unclc:;;stana \c t'.n action 1:ei.t . in the J.)V.~.;;lic inte:;:-est? We think it is so w~1en ••···.;a••••.•.• - 8 ,lp~~c~ n:# ob;j~.r ~·- Jmp;,Mi,n•-trM ►~ ~imt1.rily 2Xld not i n c ~ in tho ~rost Q'l ~i p ~ ~ ~ - Cl.ll tb.c m.:-,ttcr at issuo, mcy evon o ~ i... ,the ~.c"lu:,l <5.& ~ J : 4 " " ' ~ ~ ~ . . , . ~ - - ~ - - - - - lt1.e~ t)10 jfU'l::liO is Clrr';i:'O 0.L 1 t 01' no"b• • ·, ~--. c, mt.ttc,: irhich 'bcno.:;i ts an in~'\.ivi,~itcl mes bo 1n ~11lU J\\ji>"".;..1 Jl~"111!L ill. M,e ••..-;,i• ,•---~ ~ ~ 'lii.Ql)O tho bti.db ba.unca ~~ ccC ~ .-~•IMP t t ~~~ ~ ~ 6 r.n ,_.r-mt~ -flP.~Y .:i.-- i:¢:JJ,Q! Tho s,..\tj.cc"dvo :te~r-,e;;i.on of diso~io~ ?ql'~-i4.qai o. nc,s phQnOmonon. es of11o:l tl1e qecµ~vo ~tt~m~t to roe'tJ:iy,:t ;;.~.o seo~i·t ju.diccl. J:ovicwe nut t1.o cowts clo lbt co~1siclor t:1.omsolvos ilni~<t~t in tho f~o of thoso su'.ijoctivoly f'".;.:rJ].,ic1 ci.isorotionrJ."Y l"lo,ror. In tllo Qn.&Q from Encle.nclt the or.so of Soc, Af~£t~9..,.;._q;__J<.~\\C"Jiiop._awl 8Q1900,Q. li,lt _MoJiipnol i t.m ieff¥i•;~aUQ,. ·~-lJ:ll-~;t -~ ~ , . ~ "'theill- ~:£?..J!.JSfl~9J,-,.~[;:S s~i~d• 1w DoU:W. d~~ '.l!h.o :i.s.su,o ~ mc,-tt.cr ho could 1)o cho.,llo.....c;cd. Lord Wilborfol".0¢ ~ il.t_ l)i),681 - 6821 'Thia form ti sootion is qui to woll kn.Q1'1n. encl t,t fixs1 "'¾;;..t l:-;.i,r.!J.-t ..,.,.,_,,,i ;:,,, ·:..;.;,;,J.1.,.,'\.o ~u.:.i;ii.:-.1 xovicw. Soctio~ in tlu.s foxm mcy, no clm,bt1 oxol.wk ~c..i.N,-i.. ~ ,r:1c:t j_s or b.,"\s become r, Llc'.:H..or of pure jud[)llont~ ~ de not tlii11l; thd they GP f\u'thc:-c then the.t • If a jucloncnt roq;J.:rc, l)ofo:•:o it on.n bo mccla, tho o x ~ . of some fr,ds, t1:;,on, cl t:wv."11 tho ovcluc-,tion of thoi:JQ f,:-.cts S.s fo; tho Sco:.•ote'.l'y of St.::tc .::-J.o~ tho 02..,u:c,1 -~mst ~ o ,;wb:Q]hg_j}·.oso tacn, 9,B:JUi. ~ l L.,vo boon tclcon :i.n'tb acoount, ,nctl1or j,.1.c\:;r:1cnt llas boon maclo ~ n. i.JI'O~ sclf-cli:..'octi.on 2,s to t11osc fc.cts, 1hct,.1.or tho jv.c:c;mon, ho.s not h,cn rnci:.lo on other fr..ots w:::ich ought not to l!r,vo -::icon td;:on into a.ccoua.t. If these :rcqu,i.;:o-,- monts ;-J.'t. 11ot rnct, t: .on t:10 cxci·ciso of jucl(:;m::mt 11.ovcv~ .1<~t19:...fi__s~ ~t mey i)C' l)OCOLlOS or.1xi.1J1C of cha,llonc.;c' - .lnd e simil~ view is t~k~ by Lol'c.l :Oonnine, N..R. in t110 02,so of j_;m~lo~-:.nt Soo~oJ:"~C V:-..·s. ~s.L.-ft-l._ (1£~.. 2}tJ ,1~72· • ...L-~ n. 455 . --- ¼a who:co tho stctus scid 'if it :·.:e-110::-;;:-cc":. t:::, t:1.0 Jninistcr' ho 601.'.l<l ~ o~to.in tl:.ii1cs. Lo:rcl Dcrminc l~lt. ,--,t ::,:;,,. 492 - 3 scid: 9 ' !f' it 2..ripears to tl1e Sc01°etary <:4. State J thj.~ in cy- ~on ,!oes not L1ean tJ:i.:..1.t the Min:i.stiert s d,ce,i G;-ti> is :i;n,1.t 1)eyond cha.llenc;e. The scope a.vaila.~le ~ the 11,.all~ -O..G:Pencls veT-y- mu.cl1 on the sv."bjeot r.10.t+.er with \rl.ri.ch the Ministe~ is den.line. In this case C wp\ill,d think the,t if the l-1111.istGr ,toes not a.at in fai-bh or if he a.oi;s o~ a::t1:l~M~~ e#Wd,d,q,=,ej.on.. ~ G• ~;b,;i .tl~ to int'luence ldr.1 01~ if he p l ~ n'La<11 +~~ himt:ielf ~ fnct or in lnw, it nr.y well ~ ~ t?- ~ •1Q11l'1,. iniier"f'ere. nut wb=rn he h ~ • ~~=.~ff the fnote .or the law 1Jtiic;.1 oould r~~'.\r ~~ ~ then his decision is J:J.Qt.:~:; ·f-'8 .s,,g.t~.~ ~~23.f. ~rnse therec£ter soneone tllinks th2,t ·his ~"' wna w.ronc;., 4l!Jlo P-~iv.r (;c,wicil r,s per Lord Se.loon e~)l~essed the~ f ! I O ~ ts. l"JQr6 'bit~ll(,; J.w.cu,.-:>.c;e in the oo.se o__,f ,!U?..~~a::&l ,t ~it _sar1,wi:1: Jlpf~ra:;Uno.YJ,l.Gt..Yn,s. n~,uo'=5ls1 , 198~= A,if..s.~S-. ~ :U: io •~ CM ~• 656~ 'Their Lorc.'1.s1.li:Qs consU.er thd it is inpoosi'ble ~ o. re::,ul;-,,tion •••••••• could l)e rro~exly construed.~ 0pnfe;.•rii1,; r;1,igt4toric.J. __;:,o:T~'J! ~ th~ ~-~~en! '. thnt is wh._;t tl1e rec;u.ld::.on would pt:t.rrort · to dQ • if t1~.e ~t.=d.£f 1 .if t.,1,.Q Go'V'o~or j.a satisfied' tK-Q.1\ No clou.'bt lli tlei- • oe~es - which he took vrere necessoxy and justi- :f'iable, 1JU.t no reasonable Lian could think ~ ettch ~ • • The notion ef a ~joo-ti.ve or unfettered cliSOj:>e~i1'-n is oontra1.•y ta the Rw.e, o±: 1£.~• All :;_-,owe.r has lec;al liui ts 2nd tb.e rule of law der:.1e.nds that tlle ~ sllould be r.ble to 2.x2nit10 th0 exc:rcuse of clisc:;..•~ · ~ :;::,ouer. If the cli~cretion is not m.,,_~~juct to review 1:y 2, court of lc,w, then in ~ur jucl(,Llent, that discretion would. 'be in. actual f2..ct c'.S 2..;:•'!.,i trnry as if tlle :..'rovisions tli.er.,· ~1-res do not rest-.dct the discretion to ~ vu:i.'r,ose end to suc;..:,:e.•i, ot;.:..orwise would in ow view be naive. l'e1'ha.i)S at this junctu:..'e 1 should reuinc1 all 011d sundry that the inI)o:dcince of t::e :.·ol<:J c-:.: t;.:.o cou:ds in tra.En:1elinc abuse of executive .?.nd aclJ:unist..·ative :."'o·;rer of "t!J.e 0overnoent was fitt:i.ncl.Y r,u.t a.c:;.•oss by an eninent Enclish ju.(1~e Lord Dennin:; }~-• 10 - 1 'llieae courts have the Z'Jlt):iori ty r:ncl I 1-rould add the c1.u ty, in 2. r:ro1,c:.:- co,se, . -when called ur,on to enquil'e into the exercis~ of a cliscretionary i:owr 1,y a !:f\lllister o~ his ctoi:a:ctraent. If it iG ~._~·"-'-... ~-w:-..~ P"i::iPed,.~G.t.A-w- t,J.:' i:'listakenly so 2,s to inf:dn;:,e unjv.st.ly on tb.e l0t..--:i timo.te :ri[thts Md i.nterests of the cnbject-, then t~:10se cou:cts must so c.leclc:re. T1.:.ey stccU1d, c'.S ever, between the axec1.1.tive t'll'ld t:.'.le su1)jeet, .:.i.s ' Loz:d ~ ~ in r. fc1:·1ous r;assa,.::;e, ~ert tQ,. 4ee that ~'-l'\T .aa.e:oo1.vn 1,41DQ. to ~ m i.Q ,..,._"'ir % _ 1-rhicL. I i-rould add: z.le:rt to .see that a discm-e- tion~y power is not exceeded ~ 1:'J.suood.' o .... ~ t,e,.-af. e t • ~ ~..- ~ r*=~~ ~ t.o. tb.uk "tha"s since the ~ona;,.•y pcnrers of the J::;:,,esid.ent a:rc sulJ~-.. worded, then the :P:r0sident _is be;ro,,nd .cl:.el.lence. As c:1-Ll:i?lY d€:i,10n- sti•.a:tod. h,e~ Dl>ove, the 'President can G'J cl4--i.llati£edg. "° ,a.a •-to..~ that bis j?t,weJ:' hs.s l)een I;i'operly been exai.icis~d• i'fe now CP to the ouster c ~ c:l..nd "17b.ich. 5(.')Cl8t;i.qa ·~ey &-e rdu~cd to as ];1'i"~tive cl.suses, ,-rhi.ch ettet11)t to oti.st th& ju."t'isdiction of the cotu-ts, As s t£i,tcc1 o. .--.rlie.J:9 the ouste.r clcJJ.se ii. . hexe is contained in s. 23· (2) (G.) of tl,.e Civil Sei"Vice' Act. Noo 16 /1989t .At the outset I wou.lc:l like to :-ut clo-wn 1;lainly tl1c..t ou~.mr olruses axe pai)er tiqei·s nce.nt to scc;l.'e the unwa:..'y end the uninitiated in tJ.,io reo.,J.n oi the lc'..u. They a:i.·e sin:;:ily :;_:Ut the:re o.s soa:;.•ecrows. As IIo!!e lt:.11 Justice J~hn Lc,,us st1:1,tes in bis ~ticle ';ts tl1e lliua__Co~t .Jh! Guzl.t'M~ of Func'l&JEmta.l Coi:sti tuticl}.o.l f~1ts?' in the. :Pu1:;lic Lc.w, 1 S:i.11.00 t;:~e oo.se of ~4~inic Vl's~ Forcicn .Q.2~pen~:;,-t:i.on CQLU:ri.ssion: '1~6S 2 1:,.,c. 147, ~J.i?~ ptU'.'1:,0:rtinc to oust the jurisdiction of the oot~1s have fallen into clisuse. To oust the Q~"ts :,ower ef re-view is nccessc.riq to :;_mt ~one no\ the cou.:-t the jul1.ce of whet the law is, ,{,.ich is tl1e s2.--:1e thine. T'ne courts will :;_.,:L"Cst:!70 ,-,.~_.cinst tJ1e confe:i'Dcnt of such c. i".lOwer- 1 • - 'El,e. ~ ~ WE.$ er.i.)l.~esse0. :,._~ Lo:rcl Dil)look ~ th cha-ooteristiQ ~ ~ :i,n tb.e or,.se .of ~-..n.a.oru; Co~1flic ·,ti2rlfi .1w_, ~ D,tie:.. ~ • ~ p»~pDocls on t11e r,reSU1'11,tion that· when Parlior.1ont confers on an ai'Jin:Let:i:dion t:d'tunal or rat:10:..'it.Y,. v..s rJ:im.~ f:;:-on a court of lnw, j?ower to dmc.1.e e i:,a.,:,ticn.iJ.z,.r question clefi.neJ. Dy the Act, oonfei~z-inc~ ti1e wwer, Po.rli1;1r.1ent il1tenls to confine the.t rowe;;.~ to a.nsue:dns the -question t·,s it ho..s 0een so d.efJnecl r-.nd if t~e:i:·e b.2.s boen on;r clov.1:t <.\O to wh0t th~,t q_u~ation is, this _ia a. i:1..,tter for 001.,;.~ts o:~ lmr to resolve in ;fvJfil.-Jo. . r;-t' tneh- E_9:1st~tu.t!on_~ ;.·<?~acs inte.j,-,re~s cf iiu,- wr1tiio11 lc;~ilnn~1.- ~1onunJ.or:,., of tho co,:Jn.Qn ~ - ~ J:Ule,:s •f ec;.i,,i~, 1't, be ew:e, ou;w oJ.~ ~e ~effective to e:x:c-luC..e the 1,0~-rel.' of tb.o ~-Cou,.. ➔ tp ~ i s e its @1/-¥~~P~::S:Y:.--ole c.s confe:-.:;.~ecl on it by Art. 108 (2) of.' ow Constitµtion,; over infe:1.'ior tribunds 1 and r~.it,l:i,a c,.utho:d ties. I;t is o.;rionctio th2,t dl sto,titory l)Ower confe:..~ Q,n ~_1..t1Jlio officers inolucl:i.n,:; tho :Px·esir.:lent u:,:e ~µa~~t .to3~~s~_on , 'by ·the lli.f.,h Couri; ~i~ its ol::,aq;i.o c-ncl trad.i tional function t}f .judj.o:i.ol l;evlew:' no tvr.L 0 Es·t~,,.~ ·In~. t,:_e e.::i~+.:.,.:."J.~0 _,j:f :.:.n ou.stcr o l ~ ~ Tc..nza.nia Court ()f l:J.::i_cco.J. !1,"!-S es~~"...1.Secl t::i....~t view in e. nur:1:.,er of c:ise.s.. :.ntg clio.: r A,.G., tLe Lessinoi N::1.eincd ~. ot:..ors hi• 1980 • .;-• T.L.:~. 214 Al.J,v Li:r;u~ Y;:s~ .Ttu1;?.t1aj.eJi::t:0~,otU'p, ~}lt;~,t.i.."o/J.....PP...L.91:.v:.l Arpeal !~• t, ili~3; n.:~. J{2~j8:.'.Je.~. Ess9 §~fP.c\t:~Vi'JW~a... ~t.9-., :o.z~1.1._ Q.i..Y!L. Arp0al. No. 10L12e2. In the last c,:,,se F.tJtionE~d ~Iakro:1e J.,;_ o~·se:-~ th2,t c':.csii te an· ouster clause the ::1:i~_.:1 Cou:-.:-t could. exi1wine a clecisiqn. t·:-· sea if t:1e rules of ~1,:.t-1.1:,;•al justice we1'e o1:,cervcd in 2J.'Tivinc a.t t~e decision, ir!1ich would. in tu:i:n dete1--r.1ine wl1et:. e:;:- theie was a 0 V<'J.id a.ec:· sion o'..!.· 8XJY d.ecision at c.11. :Gowever I have to -:~oint out that the position now is thci,t not only 02.n the clecision of n :)u~,.µc authority be oh¥1en;:..od for viola tine, t:1e :;_1;•inoi:;_~les of' nr.~aJ justico, but the c;round has 1.::cen e..''tj.)ahc!.ed• Lc,:.:-d J)i:;_,lock in the cci.u ,ff c,c,s,c·. ~:c.s ... l•~~is~~· fo::Jt,q 9iyil ffo;_;y~~ 1zC4 ) P.l 1,.:~ ....23.2... "J.,J.,. iclentifieu four ~-:.:-~.rici:;_---las'. ,/_iclo. ec.n ~;e l.'.sccl to chdlenc.e a dvo:l,,ste,n ():::' c. :;_,1.1.~:;lic mthori tzr, _. nc. th~t ccse 1/t',s wi ted' ·,'1. th c,:;: :;_·:::-ovc.l ~ .y t::.e Tn:.'mania. Cowt o~ .L:,:-pocl iJ'? t~:002.sc of Sr..i.1.£':.i 1~');1:I'ur;1b2: Vrso t:1Y13-9_ Che,eha.: (Mill!.Ylza. Ci'1,l P.lX·~.-~.t.-~lS>-2• 'Eiese fou::- :;:dnciples ezo il:l.e,:ali~. ( ·failcie to foloi tl:.e ir.w) 9 2_;,.'ocec.m.'c.l :LJ:;_,:;:-oi:::iety ( fcilUJ:>e to obse:rv,e· the ·. ·::::·. ,-_.-:_-._"?_:,:: ·f .,.._J .. -,~1 J·,,nt•, - •. l.,,.,,:,;, -'· . e ..._ ... ' ~.,,,,, .<..:.J..~ ,.......,,..... ,.J ;,.._........, -i> ... z~,"~• ~ ....... to u.et wit:;. proced1.-i:c2,l fr..i:;.~ess) ~ h?o.;f;i91~sJ.J.iit: (nddnc. a c:.eci~on ..·' .. 12 - -- -- - ,CSqJ. ~ ~ ~ ~ . : i . t s _ . d a f i ~ .J01f..lo.ida ~ ~ - - ~ - ~ - standa:rds that no :reasonable rera.n -who had a.p~lied his Jh4id to it ~ d . have made sue~ a, decision) J J!I'•l~U.o~i izy' ( that th.~ noQIIA emJAaired by a decision-oake,-. are no oore than is ~ o n b . b ~ to a.chi.eve his or her lec;itioate aims). The doct:cine of ~ ' -....--.._ tit,nali ty has been 1,eooenised by the Tanzania. Court of Ap~ ·in the case, d' :p.t\P,._Yz:s« Dmm11 IL't\«~._,A.·i·pesJ, 11',,., 2§[•2~ J W1d~Kµkutiac ... 01~ Pur.i!JUP smclJpor Yrs, AUQ~eY- Gene~, Utaaw,~ _ ·-- - -···- .. _Ji'?-1 A,-.m~~~ Ne, 32 of 19)2~ T'.a.1.e decision of the Pl,esiden~ 1- ~ - · ·---- this :iartioula:.r case is open to oha.llenf:,"'0 on all these f.~ .J?.rillcivles. It ney 1)e a:re:,uecl in •,»hDl-'t -~ lll.e P,,~G.i.w:)1,:t tl)2.:t..~ . ii.a-~~--did~1t<li~•~ ~ ti:hi,c11 ~-Q.u.nd :.if 1)UbJ.i~ in~o.,rt. he relJO'V'0d the sc:rvant in the civil a02''V"ioa, then it is not -~~ to nount a ohallencc on his cleoision. That. O:C@ment.1.a --· - ~ . ln 1:hq_,Aa-o Ingystc~& ._td,,....QW (Jw.1?81 the lTesidQnt did no-t disclcso t~~-0 1mblic interest ~lved when -~ revokod soco.boccy- 1 s :ri{jht of oocuj:.:>ancy, ncvcrthouiss 1;h.a . ! : : a t ~ - ~ . . . ---- •:f' J.i)_pea.l...took into_ cooount -the hk;tory of tho case wbieh ~ - - • • µ ' - • _ . . , ; , . . - - : th~t the re,Jcation was nadc to assist a ~ublio corrorGtio~ to occupy the land in cl.isrute in which it had treavassed. into o.Jld tho oourt held the.t, the.t wa~ not ~ j_;1.,t1)1ic inwest. · In th0 · oc,se at hand al thoUQ-1 tb.c Prosidont l1as ~t cie.e.l.f)Scd -e,s to what ~ isl~:.:es1._w-.JUJ.d..-ha S0XVOc1 in 210.C.0.$~ :tho.-.~tirotb:tho civil service yet taking i n t o ~ - ~ ~oey of tho caso, , -the court at the raain trial would 1Jo at l i b ~ 'to ¢On.Sid.er on 'lhethor tho President vras to eorrect to tako ill.to at;ioount in roaching his decision the fa.ct that the civil soi~t i.s quoa-tiall. had an oeononic sa1)o tnco crinin2,l ca.so in which he was aoqui ttoa. and ·1JJ,orD WOJ:10 cli..eo.f.I>~ 1,1~oooodince t1t..,r:-ainat the said soi~t.nt but which ondoii. in favour of tho so.id sorvent. 11"..ic u-iaJ. eou;n. ,riJ..1 hc:.vo to consiclor 2,s to .-mother the ~,osiclont was 1.'ic)lt ta tclk.a ~ :into account i;hosp .c.strano01,1.S ·Cansic1r.J:i.,::titl1u; ..in. al.'Tivinc; at hie decision. '!he courts 1..inclo:r the L~uctrinc of SOl)a.t'n.tion of powers· ore 0~£1..!'G'Od with tho to.slc of upholding the-Constitution and D.Ctinc a.am rolmmk: on otl1or l):...'o...'1chos of the c;ov~'nnon-t, !n tl10 two themes .I.fl 2.1)ovo, I h~-.vc o.ttonptcd to explain ho7T tho judiciro-y h2,s rojootod attcopts by tho EY..ocutivo to ovor-..ccsoh inc1ividual l"ic;l:lts by tho uso of locislction :;wovidinc, subj~tivo cliscrotiontiry pow01's wd I•! ~~- . 13 - -~~.. -~~~ct-~~ ~ . a g ~ t9. a.t-tff'k. 9n tho ~ .of the poli tioru. Ql'attehos of tho c o ~ --~-"-~ ;, 1;i0qW.r~ \JMQntrollod powo:r, is hichly co~dab1o ~· show, tbA'\ -thoy a.ro fitted to :"ro\l'ido an offcctivc chock acainst 4i,.'l)t'cs.eivo 9~~:i,so ~f ;pPWOl' 'b;y th(j Jkocn.\tivo·, Fo~ William ~ciAo, in .__ - - ~ t o l l l l \ l l d Q f ~ J L ' ~ ~ ~ ~ (1981) at i,p.8,3,-84 has conucndcd -tho 001.1.1.·t"s rolo 1q statin61 '.••to 0%0Dpt a pu1,lic 0Utl'J.Ol~i<t;r from ~ho ~ of tho courts of law is, to that cxtont, to 0-'ant ~iot~~o.J. 1'0lf91• ;tt is nt tO:iq)(jiNJ;'atiOJ?, , thOJ:"ofor9, 1o d.Qsor:Lbo tbis ns m1 a.buso of t!.lo :,:-owor of Parlionont, ......,__ , ~~~~~.. ,!l.i.fr~e- tb.o- ~~ ,-...___.__ -...,. as .l,. sec it, :tor the strone, it micJ1t evc11 be so.id - ~ et.---,nd which the coui--ts• 11;:-,vo ~--~r'l4D3$, .. _______.,_ .,..___ . - allowing .lots of J?ai•lisr.iont to c~oa.tg upckots Qt; - . -,.aQ(?ni:roUAi... µ g ~ . u , . - ~ of tho 11.ulo of LD.if. !'~liaoont-is-~ ~ o c t --~s--~•~-tio.o-a ~ too nu.ell wcir)lt to tcu;_-.io1·£'.J.ji" convcnioncc r.nd too little· to con.st! tutio11cl r,:dnci~•lo. Tho lcws dcl~, tloccthcr wi tll its uncertainty and oxponac tct1J?ts covo~1mt to tekc......sh.ort ..ou-t?!,-by olini.t:4~tio11 of tho courts. But if the com.--ts t.rc ~:;~ovontod. from cnfo:i:.c:il:iG tho lmr, tho 1•cr.1ody beooncs uo::-so thcn ~10 d.isoooo 1 • It is only hopoc1 that tho Exoo1..i.tivo will toke t:,is dialot;UC with ~ ; m ; ~ Uncontrolled. l"lOlrol" on the ?r::L't of the Exocmtivo docs 11ot ~-~""~tlOOl'.e..tio Govornncnt. It s::00.J.cl bo noted tl:J,nt Courts n;;::-o i11 n. position. o:t-i:ld.o].)Olldorb() nnd \lo they ~.o. . often b e ~ placed tl1£.J.1 tho Prosiclont cr;c .. azu <>i:b.CJ: l,)Ublic ----..Jl'~J~,+.,.i1::.,c,em)lll1:l,i.v--iio .assess tllc wciQ.lt of cot1DOtinc asr,octa of tho publiQ interest. Fincliy tho Stti.tc Attornoy l!°tL'. Nyc.1:d.l'.'i udvoo c',tin(; fox- tho P:l'osidont, ro:-cuocl t'b.ct tho p1·ovisio11s of sections 5 ru.1c'.. 7 of t'.:w Ponid6ns' th'dinanoo·1 08.p. 371 11.:::r tho 1?l!.".iJ.1tiff to :present his cld.o in Oourt. Doth t~1osc sections 111"'0Vif.1o tJ.1.0.t 1 ng officer who has _,qopn... ~o~irod. in 42;t1~li0 ~tc;rcst hes r'.l'l rJ',soluto rifi]xt to coo;ponso.tion for J28.S,t services r11c1 to gt.':;.er nlloi:rt..110cs ho is othorlr.i.so cnti ~locl tel The short 211mrcr to tl:,oso provisions is tl12-t they 2.i.'O u,nconsti tutioncl end so void. They n,.,:,c donyinc n. :pc:.'son tho rie;ht to ~00ll1ora.tion for work done contZ'n.ry to Lr4i. 23 (1) of otU'.' Constitution. Eq_t.mlly Art. 24 (2) r,:i~ovid.inc; ··••·· ...'···•-~~.,. ...... - . . 14 .. t11at no one ~ be cloprivcd of his l)I'o::,0rv 1dthout A':lthe>l.~W ~ ;ho 1a.w wbi.o.b. ehcll sot out oonditiom fro.' fc.ir r.nci odO(JJ...~ • ootr)onsction. The lc.·u· that iG io:?,i,101od is not cocid lmr ~ io nt• oo.vod by A:t't. 30 ( 2) of o\U:' Consti t\.\tio11 1Jocnuso it is • ~ ..q.J.?apr« on<.\ with.out nctoQ\U\iiQ sc£c,c,uc:cc1o rec.inst· ;:,ny SllCh 1 • ~ , ~ 4 - ~ . 4ticl tiv o;r:r~ ~ ~"~:?:ziJ.a SC rua:»ana:U.ar • j.i) is .nCJ't ~ l ~ " :f.,e LJi ~·,.Jie'oesssxi•;to 80hi•a,v,j 8• ~ . objoctivo. l3otll iili.oao. ~il1oiploe. h~vo 1Joon cx-p~'1.:::oo. by tb,o, •:-~q, .Oo~t of ..lvpoal in t~10 cnsos of ~~r;;,.,9.,l_o ~ KfstJ A,ttQ:r:ncy ,..!oiji,a.lL"-1Nsll£-)_.Q.i.2!_.l_~;:J2,o~ )fo..L...3.Zl199i.;im n:ei:ei i.,a, D~. l,cto1 (;nsH~mintc'l: .A.11r,,2s,l !?..,_ ~/ 1~~ Ii. shoulc: bo notod th...-..t undo:i: A;rt. 9 ( 1) (~J) of our Co~1,~,ti t1.1tion_, -t:Jio Pr~dOl'lt 8llcJ.. r.ll ~ 1 strJio nt,'Cnoios a;:c :L'oqtw~od to clircct cJ.1 tl10 l)Olicy OZll1 b:D~a tcu·,~.:ds tho Vl"osov::,tion rncl 0001?lit.nco .rlth tho be.sic lc.w of tho l~, tb.t'.t ie tho Oattstitution. .A.net A,......;;,. 2~ ( 1j o-t 0\.1l' . .c,.~~"ktcm dj;c-oots that every :parson, iucll~' tho lTot.d.tJ~ is oblicod to cotr.Ql.y ,ri th tho Co:;.1sti t\.1.tio11. It is tl1crc:f'o1~0 S'UI'",;?i:'i~il'l(.; to noto t~i.r,t tho h~ooidont hr,s OJ?tcd to o'boy · tho ~ ' t ; t ' i . u . t ~ ?Cl--udons O:i:diJ:lt:n0O ifl.:i.:',O!l offends tho bi,"",GiO la.w ..c4 t'.J.o lo..11el. I 212.v-o to :.:ccl.l'ld tho )"J.'.;isid,,m.t c..nct o.11 o ~ ~ _ officials th2.t tmc"!.o;.• ooot:lon ,;,.,(1) ot,'~~.JfoJWiw,tion( Q,ons~1J9ntiol ~•oviaj.pl.QJ.,M;i:~.J!o, ,:16L:!2lM tthey have t o - ~ AU t:10 op.ati.."l;'.:i _lmr (laus pc.,ssod 1,;oforo 1-3-1985) .&s ~~ M ~ to ~Jrine thoti into confoJ.•ru. ty with o'U.i: :Bill of Rif;hta .A.o-t. No.,, 1JJ 1984. So all le,us r,c,osoc.1 before 1-3-1985 should not 1Jc token c.t tl1ci:r fooo vc.J.uc, but should Ol'l~ bo o1Jcyod if they don•t ~ "1.&;a.insii tho 1x:i.sio.. l~.w ..:,£· ~ ~ 1"40 -COnsti tution. Tho ProEti ~ --►--:~. _ - - ~ - l k ~ l i l i c should bo in :f.oro---tront. 'tc ..tli.~e,'O:Od. o.11 ---..... tho lo~ws that r,:c in broM.t. I the Comiti tt.1tio11, such r,s tho Po.ra:d,ot\4-. •rd.inal'X}Ce As DDJ.)ly c1ooouoti:'~tod 2J)OVO --the .,,-cu.sios» ~ o . violc.toJJ, +..ho ~i.::.ht to ;0:0;-o=-:>ty c.11c1 tho :.,ic).1t to c. ,just :cor.nmo- :r2;tion f()T' wo,:lt c'..ono. 'J;thox-o:f'OJ.--0 \ll:lc~ ocation 5 ( 1) of Act No. 16/ 1984 o.ncl Al"'t• 64 (5) of 01.ll:' Gcm.rtitution, I doclro:-o tho !}::t..10Vicians of soction 6 c.nd. 9 "'f tl:o 1'oaL;Jio110 Oi1dinc.nco to 1,c void. I hold thc,t tho 1,ld.11tiff io c.t litwi;y to pj:'oacnt his clciJ:lo 1)ofol'o t].tlo- cow..--t. • ......... ·.,.; 15 ••• •••••••• 15 - w~~~ 1 ~, ("-~V'>rl'l}.:",1'\.:l·- ,.,1, 1 t:_ .. ~ if.,_ ,>..~ .1.·· -..-.J •. .._ ."'.:,., ~-•.-r.': .. .l. ,~ ... ··•T- o· ·a· ,r;t·' -1t/f"<..• .J•---:.l.J-,..4•.-fl/ ......... .J.v~;,. . ;_, •...-~""" .-.. ':..•~-- ~-- .._~:.':.1o~r-G:..:10:.·nl fci.ls. T...:..v ~~~ 'i~ ~-.11~ ~ :_:;·-.1!'";'6ti :...1e cL~o b: :20::. o -ti·.iz oo•s.--t;. T'_o- ~ld.~~i,ot. ..:. . :..:i:J.:t_•~ >·.a. t.o ZL"\ ~ - j~ J • J •.. -'i:ttcl~1.~w.Va)-~. \ --- JtJ:OGD