20040716 TZCA Mwanza3
The application for revision was dismissed because the confusion regarding party names had already been corrected by the High Court, and the applicant failed to disclose any substantive point of law warranting leave to appeal or revision.
- Citation
- 20040716 TZCA Mwanza3
- Parties
- Applicant: Juma Fungamtama; Respondent: Petro Alphonse
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Revision Before Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Revision, Review, Appeal, Enlargement of Time, Certificate for Leave to Appeal, Correction of Party Names
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Juma Fungamtama
Applicant
Petro Alphonse
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Revision Before Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal should exercise its discretionary power of revision regarding the High Court's order dismissing application for leave to appeal
- 2 Whether confusion regarding party names in the High Court judgment warranted intervention
- 3 Whether a point of law was disclosed justifying leave to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The application for revision was dismissed because the confusion regarding party names had already been corrected by the High Court, and the applicant failed to disclose any substantive point of law warranting leave to appeal or revision.
Court Disposition
dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for revision is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment