Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court at Sumbawanga granted an ex parte application to enlarge time for filing a notice of appeal, finding record-based illegalities in the probate proceedings.
Applicant's repeated transfers between prison authorities constitute good cause for enlargement of time to file notice and appeal.
Source excerpt
Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not adduce sufficient cause for enlargement of time. Negligence and sloppiness are not sufficient reasons. Waiting for a copy of the order was unnecessary and technical filing issues should have been addressed through proper procedural channels.
Source excerpt
The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for delay due to factors beyond his control as a prisoner, and showed vigilance in pursuing his appeal; thus, enlargement of time is granted.
Source excerpt
Applicant was not negligent; delay was caused by technical failure of the Judiciary's electronic system. Technical delay constitutes good cause for enlargement of time. Applicant is entitled to fourteen days leave to file intended appeal.
Source excerpt
The applicants demonstrated sufficient cause for enlargement of time based on prompt action after learning of the ex-parte decisions, allegations of illegality, and technical delay. The court found that the right to be heard and proper service of summons are constitutional and procedural requirements, and allegations of their breach warrant scrutiny through revision. Therefore, the application for enlargement of time was granted.
Source excerpt
The applicant failed to account for each day of the 43-day delay and did not demonstrate sufficient cause for the court to exercise its discretion to enlarge time. The reasons advanced, including waiting for a copy of the order and blaming the court for technical rejection, were found to be inadequate and attributable to the applicant's own negligence and lack of diligence.
Source excerpt
The applicant, being a prisoner and having faced procedural challenges with the e-CMS system, demonstrated sufficient cause for enlargement of time to appeal, and the right to appeal is a constitutional right warranting special consideration for prisoners.
Source excerpt
Order VIII Rule 14(2) of the Civil Procedure Code applies at the Final Pre-Trial Conference stage, allowing the court discretion to set aside ex-parte orders before judgment and to enlarge time for defence. The preliminary objections raised by the first and second respondents are overruled as the application was properly brought under the applicable rule and not out of time.
Source excerpt
Applicant failed to demonstrate good cause for delay; negligence and failure to account for each day of delay are not sufficient reasons for enlargement of time; filing in wrong registry due to electronic system confusion does not excuse delay; application dismissed.
Source excerpt
Explore more
