19840910 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Citation
- 19840910 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 10 September 1984
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 10 September 1984
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The conviction was upheld based on credible evidence, corroboration of Jensen's testimony, and the appellant's actions in collecting and undervaluing the parcels, with no credible explanation for the missing customs declaration forms.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction affirmed
- sentence of twelve months' imprisonment upheld
02
Material facts
Parties
Juma s/o Chamotto
AppellantThe Republic
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Initial Customs and Sales Tax Assessed: T.shs 369
- Proper Customs and Sales Tax Assessed: T.shs 4,000
- Sentence Imposed: months 12
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the appellant was properly convicted for making a false document under section 148(a) of the Customs and Transfer Tax Management Act
- 02
Whether the evidence supported the conviction
- 03
Whether procedural requirements under section 196(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code were complied with
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant argued that the customs declaration forms were destroyed by the police who conspired with Jensen to frame him, and that his assessment was based on those forms.
- Respondent
- The respondent relied on Jensen's testimony, corroborative circumstances, and the disappearance of customs declaration forms, asserting the appellant's actions constituted making a false document and gross undervaluation.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
general criminal law
Corroboration of accomplice evidence is required for conviction
- 02
Criminal Procedure Code
Compliance with section 196(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The conviction was upheld based on credible evidence, corroboration of Jensen's testimony, and the appellant's actions in collecting and undervaluing the parcels, with no credible explanation for the missing customs declaration forms.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- conviction affirmed
- sentence of twelve months' imprisonment upheld
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 10 September 1984
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 10 September 1984
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA
AT ES SALAM (CORAM: Mustafa, J0Ao, Makame, J.A. and Kisanga, J.A. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO0 61 OF 1983
BETWEEN JUMA s/o CHAMOTTO c 00000000000 . APPELLAIT
UUMN THE REPUBLIC • • o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Tanzania at Mbeya) (Nunyera, J.) dated the 29th day of August, 1983 in Criminal Appeal No 0 33 of 1983
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT NUSTAFA, J0A0: The appellant was convicted of making a false document contrary to section 148(a) of the Customs and Transfer Tax Management Act in the District Court and was sentenced to eighteen months' imprisonment0 He appealed his conviction and sentence to the High Court 0 The conviction was affirmed, but the sentence of imprisonment was reduced to twelve months. He is now appealing to this Court 0 The appellant, at the material time, was a Customs Officer0 He had arranged with one Jensen, who was P0W.1 at the trial, to order a radio casette for him from overseas0 Jensen was an expatriate working at that time at Nbeya0 Jeisen ordered that along with other items and these goods eventually arrived at Mbeya by air post0 Jensen had stated that he had shown the appellant the catalogue and the invoice in respect of the goods being ordered, and if Jensen was believed the appellant knew exactly what the cost of the radio casette and the other items wasp *0 0 ./2 - 2 - When the parcels arrived at Nbeya in the neme of Jensen, the appellant came to know of the arrival, and by virtue of his office, obtained possession of the parcels, took them home, and opened the one, according to him, which contained the radio casette. According to Jensen both the parcels were opened bythe appellant in Jensen's absence0 The appellant assessed customs and sales tax on the radio
casette at T.shs. 369/-; a gross undervaluation. Later when a proper assessment was made of the contents of the parcels, a sum of over Thse 4,000/- was made. The appellant had alleged that one parcel. contained the radio casette and the other parcel contained only books and mag a zines, for which no customs or sales tax was leviable. However, the customs declarations on the parcels, according to which the appellant alleged he had based his assessment, were not available. The appellant had alleged that those forms were torn off by the Police, who had conspired with Jensen to frame him. Beth the courts below believed Jensen as a truthful witness. The tria1court was prepared to treat Jensen as an accomplice However, there were corroborative circumstahces. The appellant himself, in the absence of Jensen, collected the parels, knowing that they wer addressed to Jensen. The appellant 1 himself paid the customs and sales tax. The customs declaration forms have mysteriously disappeared, the allegation that the Police had deliberately destroyed them being completely incredible in the cirumstances•0 ..../3 -3- We are satisfied that the appellant was properly coiVicted on the evidence adduced at the trials We are also satisfIed that the provisions of section 196(1) of the Criminal Procedure CodeJere 6n15iid with in this case, p j/•' The ./appai 'is. dismissed. I_\ DED ARESSALgAM this 10thday of September, 1984 . : A6 MUSTAFA JUSTICE OFAPPEAL. L. M. MAKAME
JUSTICE OFAPPEAL R. H KISANGA
JUSTICE OF APPEAL I àertify that this: is a true copr of the original. - B. P. MOSHI ) SENIOR. DEPUTY. REGISTRAR
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.