Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

jumanne bakari salum others vs republic 2018 tzhcced 17 17 april 2018

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Since the offences charged are bailable and the prosecution does not object, bail is granted subject to statutory conditions regarding value of property and sureties.

Court disposition

bail granted

Orders

  • Applicants to pay cash deposit equal to half the value of property involved: 1st-3rd applicants Tshs. 3,000,000/= each; 4th-6th applicants Tshs. 13,000,000/= each.
  • Alternatively, deposit title deeds of immovable property of equivalent value, free from encumbrances, approved by Registrar of Titles and accompanied by government valuation report or local authority evidence if unregistered.
  • Each applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each signing bond of Tshs. 5,000,000/=.
  • Applicants not to leave Dar es Salaam Region without permission from Resident Magistrate in charge of Kisutu RM's Court.
  • Applicants to attend court on every scheduled date without fail.
  • Applicants to report to Central Police Station once a month on Friday of the second week.
  • Resident Magistrate in charge of Kisutu RM's Court to approve sureties and bail documents before release.

02

Material facts

Parties

Jumanne Bakari @ Salum

Applicant Counsel: Jamhuri Johnson, Gideon Phares Opanda

Mathew Maziku Emmanuel @ Mnyonge

Applicant Counsel: Jamhuri Johnson, Gideon Phares Opanda

Juma Mohamed Mataaka @ Daweshi

Applicant Counsel: Jamhuri Johnson, Gideon Phares Opanda

Nazar Tahrali Patel

Applicant Counsel: Jamhuri Johnson, Gideon Phares Opanda

Jaffer Kilimbe Mwakibete

Applicant Counsel: Jamhuri Johnson, Gideon Phares Opanda

Maria Mwalikaka @ Samila

Applicant Counsel: Jamhuri Johnson, Gideon Phares Opanda

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Vitalis Timon

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Property Involved (1st 3rd Applicants): TZS 18,000,000
  • Cash Deposit Required (1st 3rd Applicants, Each): TZS 3,000,000
  • Value of Property Involved (4th 6th Applicants): TZS 78,500,000
  • Cash Deposit Required (4th 6th Applicants, Each): TZS 13,000,000
  • Surety Bond Per Surety: TZS 5,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial for economic crimes involving explosives and organized crime

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants, through counsel, prayed for bail pending trial, arguing offences are bailable and court is properly moved.
Respondent
Respondent, through principal State Attorney, did not object to bail and consented to grant of bail.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 29(4)(d) and Section 36(1) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap.200 R.E.2002] as amended by Act No.3/2016

    Bail may be granted for bailable offences if statutory requirements are met.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Since the offences charged are bailable and the prosecution does not object, bail is granted subject to statutory conditions regarding value of property and sureties.

Court disposition

bail granted

  • Applicants to pay cash deposit equal to half the value of property involved: 1st-3rd applicants Tshs. 3,000,000/= each; 4th-6th applicants Tshs. 13,000,000/= each.
  • Alternatively, deposit title deeds of immovable property of equivalent value, free from encumbrances, approved by Registrar of Titles and accompanied by government valuation report or local authority evidence if unregistered.
  • Each applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each signing bond of Tshs. 5,000,000/=.
  • Applicants not to leave Dar es Salaam Region without permission from Resident Magistrate in charge of Kisutu RM's Court.
  • Applicants to attend court on every scheduled date without fail.
  • Applicants to report to Central Police Station once a month on Friday of the second week.
  • Resident Magistrate in charge of Kisutu RM's Court to approve sureties and bail documents before release.

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 17 April 2018

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 17 April 2018

jumanne bakari salum others vs republic 2018 tzhcced 17 17 april 2018

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

JUDICIARY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA

CORRUPTION AND ECONOMIC CRIMES DIVISION

AT PAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS ECONOMIC CAUSE NO. 17 OF 2018 (Originating from Economic Crime case No.21/2018 of Kisutu RM's Court) 1. JUMANNE BAKARI @ SALUM 2. MATHEW MAZIKU EMMANUEL @ MUYONGE 3. JUMA MOHAMED MATAKA @ DAWESHI APPLICANTS 4. NAZAR TAHRALI PATEL 5. JAFFER KILIMBE MWAKIBETE 6. MARIA MWALIKAKA @ SAMILA

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC................................................RESPONDENT

RULING Date: 23/04/2018 Matogolo, J. The applicants in this application namely Jumanne Bakari @ Salum, Mathew Maziku Emmanuel @ Mnyonge, Juma Mohamed Mataa @ Daweshi, Mazav Tahrali Patel Jaffer Kilimbe Mwakibete and Maria Mwalikaka @ Samilal^ 2nd,3rd,4th,5th, and 6th applicants respectively were arraigned in the Court of Resident Magistrate of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu in Economic Case no.21/2018 charged with three counts. The first count is preferred against the 1st,2nd, and 3rd applicants that is leading organized crime contrary to paragraph 4(d)(1)© of the First schedule to, and sections 57(1) and 60(2) of the Economic and organized crime control Act, [Cap.200 R.E.2002] as amended. In the second count which was preferred against the 1st, 2nd and 3rd applicants they are charged with unlawful possession of explosives contrary to Section 3(1)(2) and (2)(1) of the explosive Act [Cap.45] R.E.2002. It is alleged that on 26th March, 2018 at Boko Mwembetogwa area within Kinondoni District DSM region, the three were found in possession of exposure substances 450, kgs of Ammonium Nitrate and 1 roller of detonators wire valued at Tshs. 3,000,000/= without approval by commissioner for mines to be used in mainland Tanzania. The third count was preferred against the 4th,5th and 6th applicants, which is unlawful dealing in explosives c/s 3(1)(2) and (2)(1) of the explosive Act, [Cap.45

R.E.2002] It is alleged that they were found dealing with explosive substances to wit 628 bags of prilled porous ammonium nitrate each containing 50 kgs and vaued at Tshs. 78,500,000/= without the approval by commissioner for mines to be used in Mainland Tanzania. The applicants have come to this Court with their application for bail pending trial in Economic crime Case No.21/2018. The application is by chamber summons made under Section 29(4)(d) and Section 36(1) of the Economic and organized crime control Act[Cap.200 R.E. 2002] as amended by Act No.3/2016. The same is accompanied by an affidavit taken by Mr. Gideon Phares Opanda an advocate for the applicants. The chamber summons and accompanying affidavit was served to the respondent who opted not to file counter-affidavit. The matter came for mention today the 23rdApril 2018. The applicants are represented by Mr. Jamhuri Johnson and Mr. Gideon Phares Opanda learned advocates. Mr. Vitalis Timon learned principal State Attorney appeared for the respondent's Republic. Mr. Vitalis outrightly informed this Court that they have no intention to object bail to the applicants and that this Court can grant them bail. On his part Mr. Jamhuri Johnson learned advocate prayed to this Court to grant bail to the applicants. That being the position therefore, and provided that the charged offences are bailable, and as this Court is properly moved according to the provision used, I grant the application. The applicants may be released on bail upon fulfilling the following conditions.

1. As the value of the property involved exceeds Tshs. 10 million, the applicants have to pay cash deposit in Court equal to half of the value of the property involved. The applicants are charged in two categories. The first category involves the 1st, 2nd and 3rd applicants and the value of property involved is 18,000,000/=. The 1st, 2nd and 3rd applicants have to pay cash deposit of Tshs. 9,000,000/= which is to be devided by three applicants under the principle of sharing. So each applicant has to deposit Tshs. 3,000,000/=. For the 4th, 5th, and 6th applicants, the value of property involved in the charge is 78,000.000/=. So the applicants have to pay cash deposit of 39,000,000/= divided to three applicants, 4th 5th and 6th applicant. Each applicant shall pay cash deposit of Tshs. 13,000,000/=. Alternatively The applicants have to deposit Title deeds of immovable property of value not less than the amount mentioned above for each applicant to pay. The immovable property must be free from any encumbrances whatever, and must have approval by the Registrar of Titles or any other officer on that behalf. And must be accompanied by a valuation report from the Government valuer. If the immovable property is not registered, must have evidence from the local authorities.

2. Each Applicant must produce two reliable sureties, and each surety must sign bond of Tshs. 5,000,000/=.

3. The applicants should not leave Dar es Salaam Region without permission from the Resident Magistrate incharge of RM's Court Kisutu 4. The applicants shall continue to attend at their case at the Court of Resident Magistrate Kisutu on every scheduled date without fail.

5. The applicants have to Report to the Central Police Station once in a month on Friday of the second week.

6. The Resident magistrate incharge of the Court of Resident magistrate Kisutu shall approve the sureties and all bail documents before the applicants are released on bail. Ordered accordingly. 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap.200 R.E.2002] as amended by Act No.3/2016

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Explosives Act [Cap.45 R.E.2002]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.