CIVIL APPLICATION NO 53 01 OF 2020 KASTAN MINIG PLC VERSUS TANZANIA MORTGAGE COMPANY LIMITED t a MORTAGE ANOTHER
Failure by the High Court Judge to afford parties the right to be heard on issues raised suo motu rendered the proceedings and ruling a nullity, violating principles of natural justice.
- Citation
- CIVIL APPLICATION NO 53 01 OF 2020 KASTAN MINIG PLC VERSUS TANZANIA MORTGAGE COMPANY LIMITED t a MORTAGE ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant: Kastan Mining PLC; 1st Respondent: Tanzania Mortgage Company Limited t/a T-Mortgage; 2nd Respondent: Kaisi Kalambo
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Revision / Court of Appeal Ruling
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Right to Be Heard, Suo Motu Determination, Res Judicata, Jurisdiction, Misjoinder of Parties
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kastan Mining PLC
Applicant
Tanzania Mortgage Company Limited t/a T-Mortgage
1st Respondent
Kaisi Kalambo
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Revision / Court of Appeal Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court Judge determined issues suo motu without affording parties the right to be heard
- 2 Whether failure to afford the right to be heard vitiates the proceedings
- 3 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to determine allegations of fraud
Ratio Decidendi
Failure by the High Court Judge to afford parties the right to be heard on issues raised suo motu rendered the proceedings and ruling a nullity, violating principles of natural justice.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Proceedings and ruling of the High Court quashed
- Orders arising from the High Court set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment