Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a civil revision, holding that the applicant was condemned unheard in district court proceedings that nullified an auction sale.
The District Court's decision was a nullity because it decided the issue of res judicata suo moto without affording the parties a right to be heard, violating the principles of natural justice and the constitutional right to be heard.
Source excerpt
The District Court's failure to afford the parties an opportunity to be heard on decisive issues raised suo motu constituted a breach of the fundamental right to be heard, rendering the revisional proceedings and ensuing orders void.
Source excerpt
The High Court quashed a land tribunal decision after finding that failure to receive key documents breached the parties’ right to be heard and vitiated the proceedings.
The 1st appellate court violated the principle of natural justice by failing to afford parties an opportunity to address the court on the issue of appealability raised suo moto; such violation renders the proceedings and decision a nullity.
Source excerpt
Failure by the High Court Judge to afford parties the right to be heard on issues raised suo motu rendered the proceedings and ruling a nullity, violating principles of natural justice.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal of Tanzania quashed High Court ex parte orders made against non-parties without a hearing, holding the breach of natural justice rendered them a nullity.
The Court of Appeal nullified High Court ex parte orders made against non-parties, holding that failing to hear affected persons breached natural justice.
The High Court dismissed a revision challenge to a stay of execution order, holding that although the applicant was absent, the order did not affect his substantial rights.
The District Court's judgment was quashed because the applicant was not afforded an opportunity to be heard, violating the cardinal rule of natural justice.
Source excerpt
Explore more
