N
Acquittal on the first count was proper due to double jeopardy, but failure to pay compensation is not excused by lack of funds; respondent is liable to pay.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- N
- Parties
- Appellant: Labour Officer - Kigoma; Respondent: M/s Tupendane Shop
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Report Accident, Failure to Pay Workmen's Compensation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Labour Officer - Kigoma
Appellant
M/s Tupendane Shop
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to report a fatal accident constitutes an offence under Cap. 30
- 2 Whether failure to pay workmen's compensation is excusable due to lack of funds
Ratio Decidendi
Acquittal on the first count was proper due to double jeopardy, but failure to pay compensation is not excused by lack of funds; respondent is liable to pay.
Court Disposition
appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed on first count
- Appeal allowed on second count
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
. f/-c,,T-- ~--tn\-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TAN ZANI.,A ~T T:A:BOR,A ,AFPE1L;AHT JURISDICTION (Tabora Registry) (HC) CRIHINAL A1:1?EAL NO. 109 OF 1985 ORIGINAL CRITITJlUL C1lSE NO .192 OF 1985 OF THE D~J~~i::.:c: JOURT 0:2 :aGOT·'iA DISTRICT ~T IIT 00!1M Before: J• • H. S~IiUM Esq_., DISTRICT M.AGISTRATE LJfOO UR OFFI CRR - KI GO HJi • • • • • ••• • •••••••• -A1?1? lll,LAN T · (Original ,Accused) Verst1s M/s TUPEl'~D,iiNE SHOP •••••••••••••••••••••• RES1?0NDENT ( Original rrosec utor} CHJiRGlh 1st ColJ.!lti 3'ailure to .report: accident to Labour Office c/ss 3 (1) a (3) and 8 (1) of 2nd Count~ Failure. to pay wor:.anen 1 s Compensation due c/ss 42 o.:: wor. Tien 1 s Compensation Cap. 263 as ar11ended by section 42-A of ,Act No.17/83. JUDGEMEW·T MGHOME 1 P.R.M. ( E... J.). This is an appeal by the Laboi1J:' Officer, Kigoma against a decision of the Kigooa District Court. The Respondent M/s Tt1pendane Shop of Ujiji was charged ~:1d. acqui ~ted of two counts. First count is Failure to Report an .t1ccident contrary to section1· 3(1) and (3) and 8(1) of' Cap.3)0 cf ·.;ne Revised I,aws. The second Count is Failure to pay Workr1ens Oonf·iensation due contrary to section 42 of the Worknens Cor:1pennatj_on Act Oap.263 of the Laws . as amI!lended by section 42,A of :Act no,.-17/83. The evidence .q,t the trial wc-.;,s -' .1 a--:.~ the respondent failed to report a fatal accident in reBpact of his night wat.)hman the late Ka,yanda Ntoto Nkuyu who died on 9/D-/83 while on· duty. 2 J The Respondent also Failed to pay Shs. 24, 600/= as compensation to nine defendants of his late watc.hr:J.an~ The trial magistrate acqcct.ited the Respondent on the first cot.mt as ·the latter had been charged with the same offence and the same facts in Criminal Case No.13 of 1984c I agree With the trial nagist::-. _te on t!:;__:_.::: fi.:.•_:~::...,_s-:g ar:. t:1.e first coll.nt and the appeal is dismssed on the 1st count. As for the second count the trial colll't acqUitted the ·Respondent on the ground that they are a _yt-u,.1g bu.siness concern and had no noney to pay. This is a false finding, Fa.yI!J.ent of watc.hr:J.an I s Co:::1pensation is Bandatory and failure to pay can a.mount to distress orders and not to an acqcct. ttalo I therefore ~ulow the appeal on thE second count. The Respondent is ordered to pay the depenfe:adant compensation as ordered in Criminal Case ro ,.13 of 1984 or distress in def.a.lll t. L,. B. WCHOME, PRINC:!:I>.LHi RESIDENT :h/J.AGISTR~T"B, (Extended Jurisdiction) -·~~--- / I certify t(,: y of the o-riginal. .,,:r .' I/ / _/_JJ /I . • KAL~~, . RI :Jr REGIST JlA'R. --~--