michael otom amolo vs washington benesius 2024 tzhc 94 24 january 2024
Applicant failed to account for the period of delay between October 2021 and April 2022 after being declared fit, demonstrating negligence and lack of diligence, thus not establishing sufficient cause for extension of time.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- michael otom amolo vs washington benesius 2024 tzhc 94 24 january 2024
- Parties
- Applicant: Michael Otom Amolo; Respondent: Washington Benesius
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Sufficient Cause, Delay, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Otom Amolo
Applicant
Washington Benesius
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to appeal out of time
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to account for the period of delay between October 2021 and April 2022 after being declared fit, demonstrating negligence and lack of diligence, thus not establishing sufficient cause for extension of time.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment