michael otom amolo vs washington benesius 2024 tzhc 94 24 january 2024

michael otom amolo vs washington benesius 2024 tzhc 94 24 january 2024

Applicant failed to account for the period of delay between October 2021 and April 2022 after being declared fit, demonstrating negligence and lack of diligence, thus not establishing sufficient cause for extension of time.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
michael otom amolo vs washington benesius 2024 tzhc 94 24 january 2024
Parties
Applicant: Michael Otom Amolo; Respondent: Washington Benesius
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Sufficient Cause, Delay, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Sufficient Cause Delay Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Otom Amolo

Applicant

Washington Benesius

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to appeal out of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for the period of delay between October 2021 and April 2022 after being declared fit, demonstrating negligence and lack of diligence, thus not establishing sufficient cause for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed