Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, holding that a primary court case was wrongly dismissed after the complainant missed court only once.
The award of costs was justified as the suit was a civil action for breach of contract, not a probate matter. The trial magistrate exercised discretion judiciously in awarding costs to the successful respondents, and there was no requirement to provide reasons since the general rule that costs follow the event was applied.
Source excerpt
The adjournments dated 13.1.2025 and 17.1.2025 in bail proceedings were unjustifiable in terms of span and reasons, violating the applicant's right to timely justice. The High Court has jurisdiction to revise such proceedings even absent a final decision, and directs expeditious determination of bail objections.
Source excerpt
The delay in service was occasioned by administrative constraints and did not prejudice the respondents; procedural rules should not defeat substantive justice. The Taxing Master's assessment of costs lacked proper application of established principles and justification of quantum. The taxed amount is set aside and the matter remitted for fresh taxation in accordance with the principles outlined in Premchand Rainghand Ltd.
Source excerpt
The High Court at Mbeya dismissed an application to extend time for filing an appeal out of time, finding the applicant had not shown good cause for the delay.
The High Court granted four applicants leave to file a notice of appeal out of time in a criminal matter, finding their prison transfers and circumstances justified discretion.
The appellant failed to establish any illegality apparent on the face of the record sufficient to warrant extension of time, and did not account for each day of delay as required by law. The district court exercised its discretion properly in dismissing the application for extension of time.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted an extension of time to file an appeal, finding that delay resulted from online filing system errors rather than negligence.
The High Court granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, finding the delay was technical and beyond the applicants’ control due to system error.
Despite the applicant not strictly accounting for each day of delay, the court found the reasons advanced, particularly ill health, to be sufficiently justifiable and excusable in the interest of justice, thus granting the extension of time.
Source excerpt
Explore more
