mkombozi commercial bank vs frank mtegwa 2022 tzhcld 1064 9 november 2022
The application is prematurely filed as the order sought to be revised is interlocutory and does not finalize the dispute, thus revision is prohibited by Rule 50.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- mkombozi commercial bank vs frank mtegwa 2022 tzhcld 1064 9 november 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Mkombozi Commercial Bank; Respondent: Frank Mtegwa
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 9 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Revision / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Application
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Revision, Jurisdiction, Interlocutory Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mkombozi Commercial Bank
Applicant
Frank Mtegwa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to revise an interlocutory order from the CMA which does not finalize the dispute
Ratio Decidendi
The application is prematurely filed as the order sought to be revised is interlocutory and does not finalize the dispute, thus revision is prohibited by Rule 50.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- Application is struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT PAR ES SALAAM LABOUR REVISION NO. 222 OF 2022 (Arising from the award of Commission for Mediation & Arbitration of DSM at liaia Dated 11th Juiy 2022 in Labour Dispute No. CMA/DSM/ILA/5/22) MKOMBOZI COMMERCIAL BANK ......................................... APPLICANT VERSUS FRANK MTEGWA.......................................................... ......RESPONDENT RULING K. T. R. MTEULE, J. 9th November 2022 & 09th November 2022 In this Application for revision, the applicant is seeking for this Court to call for the proceedings, revise and set aside a ruling delivered in Labour Dispute No. CMA/DSM/ILA/5/22 delivered on 20th June 2022. The application was heard by written submission. Upon perusal of the matter, I noted that the order sought to be revised granted an application for condonation and allowed the labour dispute in the CMA to proceed with hearing out of time. Due to this, a question of jurisdiction struck my mind as to whether this court has jurisdiction to entertain the matter due to the nature of the order sought to be revised, since the matter in the CMA is still pending. I asked myself as to whether this court has jurisdiction to determine a revision arising over an order which did not finalize the matter in the CMA. i Since issues of jurisdiction can be addressed at any stage of proceedings before deliverance of a judgment, I felt obliged to tackle it and asked parties to address me about it. On 9th November 2022 parties addressed the Court on the matter. Ms. Mary Mwaka who appeared for the applicant admitted that since the matter in the CMA is still pending not yet finalized, then this application cannot stand. On the other hand, the respondent who appeared in parson did not have anything to add. Since the applicants counsel agrees that this application cannot stand while the matter in the CMA is still standing, then the application is contravening the provision of Rule 50 of the Labour Court Rules, G.N No. 106 of 2007 which prohibits revision over interlocutory or incidental orders which dis not finalize a matter. The Rule provides:- "50. No Appeal, review or revision shall He on interlocutory or incidental decisions or orders, unless such decision had the effect of final determining the dispute." On this reason, I find the matter prematurely filed. Accordingly, this Application is struck out. It is so ordered. Dated at Dar es Salaam this 9th Day of November 2022 JU- KATARINA REVOCATI MTEULE JUDGE 9/11/2022 2