mkombozi commercial bank vs frank mtegwa 2022 tzhcld 1064 9 november 2022

mkombozi commercial bank vs frank mtegwa 2022 tzhcld 1064 9 november 2022

The application is prematurely filed as the order sought to be revised is interlocutory and does not finalize the dispute, thus revision is prohibited by Rule 50.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
mkombozi commercial bank vs frank mtegwa 2022 tzhcld 1064 9 november 2022
Parties
Applicant: Mkombozi Commercial Bank; Respondent: Frank Mtegwa
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
9 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Application
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Revision, Jurisdiction, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Labour Law Revision Jurisdiction Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mkombozi Commercial Bank

Applicant

Frank Mtegwa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Application

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to revise an interlocutory order from the CMA which does not finalize the dispute

Ratio Decidendi

The application is prematurely filed as the order sought to be revised is interlocutory and does not finalize the dispute, thus revision is prohibited by Rule 50.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • Application is struck out