modesta modest vs mr clean ltd 2022 tzhcld 199 28 april 2022

modesta modest vs mr clean ltd 2022 tzhcld 199 28 april 2022

The notice of termination, despite a misnomer, was valid and properly served as evidenced by applicants' response; final payment acknowledged by applicants confirmed termination of employment as of 18th November, 2016; applicants' claim for unpaid salaries lacks legal basis.

Citation
modesta modest vs mr clean ltd 2022 tzhcld 199 28 april 2022
Parties
Applicant: Modesta Modest; Applicant: Happy Kihogo; Applicant: Daniel Yusuf; Respondent: Mr. Clean Ltd.
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision Application / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Termination of Employment, Notice of Termination, Final Payment, Misnomer in Legal Documents
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Modesta Modest

Applicant

Happy Kihogo

Applicant

Daniel Yusuf

Applicant

Mr. Clean Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Revision Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the arbitrator erred in law and fact by relying on Exhibit DI (notice of termination) which was not served to the applicants
  2. 2 Whether the arbitrator erred in law and fact in holding that the applicants' employment ended on 18th November, 2016

Ratio Decidendi

The notice of termination, despite a misnomer, was valid and properly served as evidenced by applicants' response; final payment acknowledged by applicants confirmed termination of employment as of 18th November, 2016; applicants' claim for unpaid salaries lacks legal basis.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Each party to bear its own costs