Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19861001 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The offence under section 26(1)(e) and (2) of the Immigration Act, 1972 is not one of strict or absolute liability; mens rea is required. The appellants failed to discharge the burden of proving, on a balance of probabilities, that they did not know the passports were forged. Convictions are upheld.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Convictions and sentences against both appellants are upheld.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mohamed Harbi Ally

Appellant Counsel: Mwakisu Nguluma

Mohiadin Ismail Musse

Appellant Counsel: Mwakisu Nguluma

The United Republic

Respondent Counsel: Miss Phillip

Amounts and remedies

  • Imprisonment Term Per Appellant: months 6
  • Passport Application Fee (claimed by First Appellant): shs 500
  • Passport Application Fee (claimed in Extrajudicial Statement): shs 310

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellants argued that mens rea is an essential element of the offence and that they did not know the passports were forged.
Respondent
The respondent argued that the offence is one of strict or absolute liability and that the appellants failed to prove lack of knowledge.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    general common law principle

    Statutes should be construed to accord with common law unless clearly intended otherwise; presumption that mens rea is required unless statute dispenses with it in exceptional circumstances.

  2. 02

    Alley Ali and Another v R 1973 LRT no. 43

    The burden to show lack of knowledge of forgery rests on the accused on a balance of probabilities.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The offence under section 26(1)(e) and (2) of the Immigration Act, 1972 is not one of strict or absolute liability; mens rea is required. The appellants failed to discharge the burden of proving, on a balance of probabilities, that they did not know the passports were forged. Convictions are upheld.

Obiter and limits

  • The sentence imposed was, if anything, too lenient given the circumstances.
  • The appellants appear to have committed other offences under sections 337, 339, 342, and 346 of the Penal Code.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • Convictions and sentences against both appellants are upheld.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 1 October 1986

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 1 October 1986

19861001 TZHC Dar es Salaam

,; .~ a,.._,_~ ~ Lt...d,,,,-~)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA " AT DAR ES SALAAM '

APPELLATE JURISDICTION HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 53/86 ORIGINAL CRIMINAL CASE NO. 30.7 O_F 198~ OF THE D+STRJ.CT COURT OF ILALit DISTRICT AT K!SUTU Before Massa~che - Pr.· Reside-t Magistrate MOHAMED HARBI ALLY ) MOHlADIN ISMAIL MUSSE) • • • • • ~ • o . • • • • • • • . ;,'; • • • • o • • • APPELLANTS (original Accused) vei:sus THE UNITED REPUBLIC • o., o • • o • • • •. : • • • • . o • • o • • ; . , -o o o • • • • • •.RESPONDENT (ortg1~al Prosecutor) ' -

JUDGMENT MAt'IGANO, J • -·· The t~o appellarts··are dissatisf:l.ed with the ., decisfo-n of the leat'-ed"pri -c:tpal ~es ide.-t magistrate at Kistltu, col"'l- victi-n~ them of bei-g 1-::- possessfo.- of a forged passports ~o-ntrtlry"to" ' sectio.,.. 26 (1) '('e_>-·a-d (2) of tHe Immigratio-- Act, 1972, a ... d se•"'lte,..,ci-ng .. : ... ~ ;. ,.. . . . : .· : ~ t 1_ ' each to impriso-me-t for . six rno-ths. . . . . ( ". ◄• • hsubsectio"" ( 1) (ta"!) whereu-der th~ l:t;~rge was laict··ma~es it a ... • ,. . j .,. , --. ..." ,. : offe-ce for av-y pers,;;-••to UiSe. or h~ve ·1- his possess~ o- a:::y forged or irretjular passport·~· A.:d sub's~cffri"'.'' (2) presci;-ibeithe ffo .... iUty for' ..:hat . ' t>ffe,-,ce as ~ fi ... e -ot-ex:ee'edl ... g' shs~3o;om:>/=3'c'.;r -impds~:.:me..:t for ~ tem ... ot exc~edi... g three yea·~~ or both.. su~h' ·f1~-e a.-a• -imfjri so.:.me""t•,. :a;o Mwakl:tsu,-,gtila who ha1~'" k>ee ... · rep~es-e ... ti:..g tH-e app~l1at.-1-... • : 'dl.o.... g has a.'1va~ced the ~~gu!l'e-\·'tha< me~s:·re? ..i~ ~~- ~[i:-~1~!- e.~~me-t of J (If, I I I offe':'ce, 'which arg~me--t 'has bee- res1sted by cou-seli."for the Re_m 1 J1ic Miss. Phillip. I wili deal witp J:h~s partfcular po1-t right aw;,, _Broadly, statute~ shoutd be co-strued !::o as t~ accord wi t 1 the accepted rules•·a'f the- c:ommo:... law r~ther· th~... to' Cr'l~i'l!::.. \<Ji~h ~hem,, except where a-d

,s-, far"as the statute 1 s obv3 ously ! te-decl .) alte~ ttte course of the cfommo-- law.·· There 'rs a setti~d pr~sumf:Jt~ O"' th.::1t 1.... ...... a:::y Stattltory ~r~me the comm·<'>.::·..:1-a~-ine•-tal elem,... ..._ :i.• e me-r. tea o.r··l!::i_l · 1;.:te,•itfo~ -or k... owledge~ ..,f the wr0,..gfut ... ~·ss· of \:.he ·act,· is a ... t-Jsse .... tial-· _ - . fI ) 1 ... gre·a.1e. . . t. But- atf !Mpli~a -abrw~,1 publi'C4- Velky m~y re~ult! i,... ~reatto ... - of · a: stattfte •dispel-s-1 -g with· the' requiireme-t · of me-s rea 1"' excepuio,..al <:ircumsta... t!es~ ·, -; . I ain .,.,ot ·satisfied, th'at-.tne' of,fe-t!e t!harged i- this case is a crime of strict or· abs"r1-lute :11:~bi;ttty, .as· co-·te-ded };)y c;_ou:..s·e1 for the Repuhlie... r ,1 If the.,Legislat!url:F had 1 ... te-dedc t'o'make it!','Sci it- would have mad<l''at le.as-t I ·some i"'dicatio--·•·:1.--~t!he statute"-''l'ike the ot.:e'J,t··a·5d·,' by .. subsectio~ (7) of \ ·the"'same sectfo ... , i-· reg1:ird .;o deel-ara1ti~~s-\· ·retur-s' .-a-d stateme ... ·b• ,' f:1is · I . ·, poi,.,t was fir~t ·raised .f;: -the l'ower :co\lr't 1- the·: c·ourse of the"tr~.al a~d . ,,\· l l'.\I 1 ... his judgme-t the~ lear-ed:'trlagistrata 1appear~d' to say that. me-ns.2:.':!·. ,_.,,., ••• .,·./2 .. ' ,,{. . ii .,1 r I), I' . • - 2 - .. ~was a nt:!cessary eleme .. t of the offe .. qe. He dealt with the poi,.,,t i,.. the ~·

following ma .... er: 11 0,...ce it is pro\ted that the d,-,cume-t:as f.,rgect•; ·the accused has to Mdd.uce evide-c~ to satisfy the c,:iurt that u-dei;: all circum- sta,,,ces h~ w0uld -,,t have k-ow- that the passport !s fofged. " The burde- of proof discharged by the accused is•o-ly O"' balance of probability (sic.)" .. .. .. .. 0"' the. ·i.;.icide-ce a-d ~hU'ti-g of burde- of proof the tear ... ed magistrate relH!d ·o;,, the decisio- f·· tht:! case of Alley Ali a-d A-other v R 1973 LRT no(\43 I agree ~1t!1 hfm e .. ~:lrely:O' 'l'h~re was abu-tla-t evid~-ce, ·•a-ti 1 t was 'hardly i- dispute;· that the appellants were fou-d carryi~g Ta-za-ia passports ~os.183610 ar-d 187405~ respectivety. • Dltto the fact '!hat those passports were forged,: I/' there was "'o official .t:'ec("rd 1- the Immigaat:10.... office about the issue of the passports; the -umbers of the immigratio- fH~s which those pass- ports purpoi'ted t"' referactual!y related to"differe-tpassport holclefs; a ... d the signatures of the issui-g !mmigratio.. officers whi.ch were bor"'e by those pa~sport~ wek'e fabric:atio--s. The co,-.ditio.-s a-d proeedul:'e pertat-1 ... tJ to the issue of passports were described by PWl t;,yatuu, a .. ··tnunigratfo~ off~cer·, as fo!lows. ., passporfs are issua~le to cH:ize-s of the U-ited Re~ublfc o""Iy.· A ptfrso~ m•akes an applicati o- for pessport by· fiilt .. g c:erta1 ..

•·forms ar,d presentii--g them to a pSsspo~t off teer for sc:ruti -y a-d•'proc:ess 1-g. The passport . .\' . officer the~ ope-s a file~ The off!cer the .. 'ascertai!:s as to whether ' the atsplica ... t is a cittze- of the ·;-ited Republic or -·ot~· If tHe appli- cation is perfect, he -ext requires a fee ,.,f shs.500/c a--d upon payme ... t of the fee a passport is !ssued. AS stated, the Hurde- t0 .. show ··that the appella-ts had "'0 k ... owt~dge ''\ '·. . tttat the passports' !- quest:io.. ··were fC'lrgett rested with the appella,-,ts 1 ... this case. The questio... , i.-deed the ,.,-ly questio ... , before this court !s whether the aceused suceeeded•'or faUed to discharge that bul'°d(?..-. !,-, his ev5de-ce the ,first appella ... t Ally claimed that He was born at Tanga, though he is of Somali stock. He said he was bor~ i~ 1965. Hc:>wever; i.- his extrajud:i.cial stateme-t tJhich he had Made to PW1 Lyatuu on 11/3/86 he had -•tated that he was bor... at: Arusha .. t-•·1950:,· He told the court that b0th his pare-ts· were- citize .. ~• of Ta-za-ia a~d that both were dea<:1 • . But 1.- the extrajud'.tci.al atat.eme-t he had•·stated that his mother was ..stil'I altve. He told the eourt ,that he wa.-.ted a•'passport because he i.-te.. tled to travel to ca-ada for··studi.es. aut 1 .... the extra- judicial stateme--t he had sa!d that he i-te--ded to proceed to ttfo USSR. He told

the Court.that he· we-t to the rmmigratio-- H~ad Office in oar es salaam whe~e he filled the ~equisite forms a~d paid a fee of ........ /3 - 3 - ... • shs.500/=• But 1- his ex'trajudicj al stat.eme-t he had••alleged that hE! I -..I filled those forms at the Arusha i.mmi gr~t~ o- office a-d 1!hat he paid a fee of shs.310/1:0. ··He told the court that -a receipt aga~_-st .. that fee was is!!ued to h"'m a-d that it was··1ater se~.zed by immigr~ti.o.., officers. But i,... his extrajud1c~ al stateme- t he had' allegtM that -o rece~pt was issued at all. He told the cBurt that he per~o-ally c~liected the pass- port three days later. But i- h1~.extrajudic:1al stateme-t he had said that .the pas~port~·was collect""d a-d br~·,ught· t0 him by his m_othe.r~· He said he··cti9"'-o"t k:.:ow··the off5cer who issued the passport •. For o•-.ce he has bee;,., co.... sfst!e-t•'.-,- tHat. Lastly He said he was arrested at the oar e~ $al aam I;... ter·- ati 0- al M rport r-- id/3/86 as he was about to leave Ta~za~ia by a!r. The seco-d appella-t Mt1sse is also of Somali st~ck. He wc1s also afre~tecl at the airport ~l~-g wjth the first appella-t. He said he .i.~te .... ded to travel to ca~'ada t, pursue M course of stt.fdy. lie told the court t'Hat both hls t,are-ts were ci t:f.ze-s of this cou-try a..,d that he was bor,,, at .:Arusha- i- 1962. •· He .said he·'happe-ed to gr, .to the Immigratior- Head

offj_ce where He mad~ a- applicatfo- for a passport. He sg1c1 he filled th~ forms a-d the- pa:td a fee o! shs.~0/=o He was give,.., the passport two days later, but he would -ot remeinl;>er fr,.,m whom he recci ved. 1 t.. ,.. ... .~ O~e e"'tertai. -s a feel J:~g··that· the two appella .. ts are 1.... timately aequai ... ted wi-th · eac:h ".'11!her, a-d that they furt1.vely acqui..r~d the pnssports · from the same source a·-d through the same ·mea-s. The le~r... ed"magistrate surmHled that•·th~ passports were procured by the at,pella .... ts i,.., collabo- . ratio,.., 'tHth a"' i'->Si der. I share that v'iew. He f1.... ally he!d th0.t the appell'ai:~:ts· ,had failed tc, rebut the presump,t{,,...: that 1!hey k;..ew, at the mat~rial time, -fhat the passports were forged. Agai-, I am·'at o-e with him. For just look at the way .. a-d exte..;t the first appella,..,t t:livtfrged from his extrajudici al statem2~·t. I w-, 11 uph0l:d ~he c0-v'tctioi-. ir-- •· . resptkt of eactt of the appe:rla-t~:•. · 'Tnere sh0Uld -ot be a;.:y ·. compUii,...t'"' agai.,.,st the se;,.te-ce. If a..:yt:h1.:.°'g, H was, l- my vlew, u ... beffi"i.:ing i,.., that it was too ~mHd~ r.:.cide-tally the' 'appella-ts appear"to have c'1f1)mitted other 01'fe··Cel?, such as th0se··c:reated by sec:t1_" ... s 337, 339, 342 a---d 346 of the"Pe-al Code. I"' 't':he"fi-al result the appears are dismissed i- every respect •. Pro... ou,..ced to the adv ,cates a··d the appella-ts. 9/~ ~,~~ D.F·. MAPIGA1',0

JUDGE nar es salaam. 1/10/86 J

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Alley Ali and Another v R 1973 LRT no. 43

Case cited

Immigration Act, 1972 section 26(1)(e) and (2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code sections 337, 339, 342, 346

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.