Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

hrg bon voyage and travel centre v mufindi tea and cofee ltd 2023 tzhc 23481 19 december 2023

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the arbitral award was agreed upon by the parties, adopted by the arbitrator, and thus authentic, final, and binding. The award meets the requirements for recognition and enforcement under the Arbitration Act and relevant regulations.

Court disposition

Application granted; arbitral award recognized and enforced as judgment of the court.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay USD 18,636.98 and TZS 500,000 to the petitioner within 5 months from the date of publication of the award, in specified installments.
  • Claimant’s claims for costs, general damages, and interest are dismissed.
  • Within 7 days of receipt of invoice, claimant and respondent to each pay 50% of TZS 1,622,000 (arbitrator’s fee and VAT).
  • Within 7 days of receipt of invoice, claimant and respondent to each pay 50% of TZS 296,000 (administrative cost).
  • Within 7 days of receipt of invoice, claimant and respondent to each pay 50% of TZS 300,000 (preliminary meeting cost).

02

Material facts

Parties

HRG Bon Voyage and Travel Centre

Petitioner Counsel: Ms. Rose Mtesigwa and Ms. Linda Mafuru

Mufindi Tea and Coffee Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Principal Amount Awarded: USD 18,636.98
  • Tanzanian Shillings Awarded: TZS 500,000
  • Arbitrator’s Fee and VAT (each Party 50%): TZS 811,000
  • Administrative Cost (each Party 50%): TZS 148,000
  • Preliminary Meeting Cost (each Party 50%): TZS 150,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Registration and Enforcement of Arbitral Award

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the arbitral award should be recognized and enforced as a judgment of the court

Party arguments

Applicant
The petitioner argued that the parties agreed on travel and hotel booking services, the respondent used services amounting to USD 18,636.98, failed to pay, and the matter was amicably settled before an arbitrator who issued a final award. The petitioner sought registration and enforcement of the award as a court judgment.
Respondent
The respondent claimed to have paid some installments awarded by the arbitrator but did not appear at the hearing.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 73(1) and (2) of the Arbitration Act, Cap. 15 R.E 2020

    An arbitral award may, by leave of the court, be enforced in the same manner as a judgment or order of the court.

  2. 02

    Higher Education Students’ Loans Board v Tanzania Building Works Limited, Misc. Commercial Cause 39 of 2022 (HCT-Unreported)

    Recognition of an award refers to the court's authoritative endorsement that the award is authentic, final, and binding.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the arbitral award was agreed upon by the parties, adopted by the arbitrator, and thus authentic, final, and binding. The award meets the requirements for recognition and enforcement under the Arbitration Act and relevant regulations.

Court disposition

Application granted; arbitral award recognized and enforced as judgment of the court.

  • Respondent to pay USD 18,636.98 and TZS 500,000 to the petitioner within 5 months from the date of publication of the award, in specified installments.
  • Claimant’s claims for costs, general damages, and interest are dismissed.
  • Within 7 days of receipt of invoice, claimant and respondent to each pay 50% of TZS 1,622,000 (arbitrator’s fee and VAT).
  • Within 7 days of receipt of invoice, claimant and respondent to each pay 50% of TZS 296,000 (administrative cost).
  • Within 7 days of receipt of invoice, claimant and respondent to each pay 50% of TZS 300,000 (preliminary meeting cost).

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 19 December 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 19 December 2023

hrg bon voyage and travel centre versus mufindi tea and cofee ltd 2023 tzhc 23481 19 december 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY)

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 547 OF 2023 IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION TIARB ACT CAP. 15 R.E 2020

BETWEEN HRG BON VOAGE AND TRAVE CENTRE ……………………..………… PETITIONER

VERSUS MUFINDI TEA AND COFEE LTD …………………………..…………… RESPONDENT

RULING 27th November, & 19th December, 2023 MWANGA, J. This application is brought before this Court for registration as the judgment and decree of the Court, an award which was issued on the 29th day of September 2022, by the presiding arbitrator Christina Ilumba FCIARB. The said award was forwarded to this Court through the petition under section 83(1) of the Arbitration Act, Cap. 15 [R. E 2020], Regulation 1 51(4) and 63(1) of the Arbitration (Rules of Procedure) Regulations G.N 146 of 2021 asking the court to register the Award. The Respondent filed a reply by stating that they have paid some installments that have been awarded by the arbitrator. When the matter was scheduled for hearing the respondent was absent. On the other hand, the petitioner was represented by Ms. Rose Mtesigwa accompanied by Ms. Linda Mafuru both learned advocates. The absence of the respondent led the matter to be heard exparte against her. Ms. Rose stated that the petitioner and respondent agreed to provide traveling and hotel booking services, in which the respondent used the service amounting to USD 18,636.98. The petitioner tried to follow up on the payment and issued a demand notice to the respondent. It is attached to the petition as Annexure BON VI. It seems the respondent was reluctant to pay, hence the petitioner referred the matter to the Tanzania Institute of Arbitrators. When the matter

came for arbitration before a single arbitrator, the parties had agreed to settle the matter amicably. See annexture BON V2 which is a copy of a letter referring the matter to the arbitration. The 2 matter was amicably settled among the parties and an agreement was entered to that effect; see annexture BON V3. Upon presentation of the agreement to the arbitrator, the arbitrator adopted it and issued a final Award. See annexture BON V4. After the final Award, parties were supposed to share half of the Arbitration costs. However, the respondent failed to do so; instead, the petitioner paid to collect the final award. See annexure BON V5. Under Section 83(1) of the Arbitration Act, Cap. 15 R.E 2020 and regulation 51 (4) and 63 (1) of the Arbitration Rules and Procedures, counsel for the petitioner proceeded to ask this court to register the award as the judgment of this Court and thereby proceed to extract an enforceable decree of the Court. Having heard the submission of the learned counsel, it comes to my mind that this application is brought to court for two things. one is recognition of an award, and two is enforcement of an award. This was held in the case of the Higher Education Students’ Loans Board versus Tanzania Building Works Limited, in the matter of Misc. Commercial Cause. 39 of 2022 (HCT-Unreported). 3 According to the above-cited case, my brother Nangela, J. defined

the concept of recognition of an Award as; “it refers to a process where a party seeks for an authoritative endorsement of the court, that, the award is “authentic” and, hence, confirmed to be final and binding”. From the case at hand, the award was entered under Section 58(1) which was an agreed award. In that regard, the award is endorsed to be authentic and confirmed to be final and binding. Concerning enforcement of an award, it is a requirement of the law that an award has to be enforced. This is provided under section 73(1) and (2) of the Arbitration Act, Cap.15 [R.E 2020], that an award made by an arbitral tribunal may, by leave of the Court, be enforced in the same manner as a judgment or order of the Court. And, where there is such a leave, judgment will be entered in terms of the award. From the petition and the submission by the counsel of the petitioner, it is seen that the petitioner and respondent agreed to the terms of the Arbitral Award, and the same was reached to the final award by the 4 Arbitrator. It follows, therefore that, the award should now be enforced in the same manner as a judgment and/or order of this Court. Therefore, this Court does hereby rule in favor of the petitioner and orders that the final award dated 29th December 2022 be enforced in the same manner as a judgment of this Court and decrees as follows: i. The Respondent shall, within 5

months from the date of publication of the Award, pay to the Complainant a total of USD 18,636.98 and Tshs. 500,000 as follows; a) The sum of Tanzanian Shillings Five million only (Tshs. 5,000,000/=) on or before 30th September 2022. b) The sum of Tanzanian Shillings Five Hundred Thousand only (Tshs. 500,000/=) on or before 30th September 2022. c) The sum of United States Dollars Four Thousand and One Hundred Only (USD 4,100) on or before 30th November 2022. d) The sum of United States Dollars Four Thousand and One Hundred Only (USD 4,100) on or before 31st December 2022. e) The sum of United States Dollars Four Thousand and One Hundred Only (USD 4,100) on or before 31st January 2023. 5 f) The sum of United States Dollars Four Thousand and Two hundred only (USD 4,200) on or before 28th February, 2023 ii. That, the Claimant’s claims for costs, general damages, and interest are dismissed. iii. That, within seven (7) days of receipt of an invoice, the Claimant and Respondent shall each day 50% of Tanzanian Shillings one million Six Hundred Twenty-Two thousand only (TZS 1,622,000) being the arbitrator’s fee and Value Added Tax. iv. That, within seven (7) days of receipt of an invoice, the claimant and Respondent shall each pay 50% of Tanzanian Shillings two hundred ninety-six thousand only (TZS 296,000) being the administrative cost. v. That, within seven (7) days of receipt of an invoice the Claimant and Respondent shall each pay 50% of the cost of the Preliminary Meeting fixed at Tanzania Shillings three Hundred thousand only (TZS 300,000). 6 Order accordingly. H. R. MWANGA

JUDGE 19/12/2023 7

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Higher Education Students’ Loans Board v Tanzania Building Works Limited, Misc. Commercial Cause 39 of 2022 (HCT-Unreported)

Case cited

Arbitration Act, Cap. 15 R.E 2020

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Arbitration (Rules of Procedure) Regulations G.N 146 of 2021

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.