Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The applicant's fixed-term contract expired by its own terms, and there was no evidence of unfair termination, reasonable expectation of renewal, or unpaid terminal benefits. The CMA's award was correct and the application for revision lacked merit.
Source excerpt
The court is satisfied that the deed of settlement was mutually consented to by both parties and thus adopts it as the judgment and decree of the court, marking the suit as settled on the agreed terms.
Source excerpt
Defendant's failure to apply for leave to defend under Order XXXV CPC results in the allegations in the plaint being deemed admitted, entitling the plaintiff to summary judgment for the claimed amount, interest, and costs.
Source excerpt
The High Court granted registration and enforcement of an arbitral award, holding it was final, binding, and enforceable as a judgment of the court.
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to plead or prove the existence of guarantors, collaterals, or undue influence, and was bound by her voluntary commitment to repay the loans. The trial court's decision was based on the appellant's admissions, the evidence presented, and the principle that parties are bound by their contracts and pleadings.
Source excerpt
The High Court's Commercial Division entered default judgment for Azania Bank after the defendant failed to defend a loan-recovery claim, awarding the outstanding sum, interest, and costs.
The High Court allowed revision, set aside a CMA award, and held that the employer lawfully terminated the contract under its terms and with proper notice.
The High Court dismissed a contract appeal over business assets, upheld the respondent’s ownership of a rice grading machine, and ordered payment of Tshs. 20,000,000/=.
The High Court dismissed a second appeal over the closure of a shop at a market, holding the traders’ agreement was binding and the appellant proved no loss.
The Tribunal only nullified the auction but did not revert ownership to the applicant; the mortgagee retained ownership and the right to re-auction. There was no material error or irregularity in the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the execution application, as there was nothing for the applicant to execute.
Source excerpt
Explore more
