mustaquim murtazar darugar vs clement thadeo buhonde 2021 tzhcld 12 24 february 2021
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear, comply with court orders, and prosecute the case for 17 months, indicating loss of interest.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- mustaquim murtazar darugar vs clement thadeo buhonde 2021 tzhcld 12 24 february 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Murtaza Mustaquim Darugar; Respondent: Clement Thadeo Buhonde; Respondent: First Observer Security Co. Ltd.
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- application dismissed for want of prosecution
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Court Orders Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Murtaza Mustaquim Darugar
Applicant
Clement Thadeo Buhonde
Respondent
First Observer Security Co. Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to applicant's failure to appear and comply with court orders
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to appear, comply with court orders, and prosecute the case for 17 months, indicating loss of interest.
Court Disposition
application dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- Application No. 576/2019 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM September, MISCELLANEOUS filing^e Was^'represented 2020. Since APPLICATION only once NO. 576 OF 2019 on 27/02/2020. then, n|' appearance Since MURTAZA MUSTAQUIM has ever been DARUGAR.................... made, despite APPLICANT has to be respected and complied with. several court orders. CouiiofdersVERSUS NoneCLEMENT o^eourt^^ets, complianceTHADEO BUHONDEnot only is a disrespect, but create chaos (RESPONDENT on entire ^n^pis^^^of justice. This cannot be left to continue. I FIRST OBSERVER SECURITY CO.LTD....... 2nd RESPONDENT understand, aoor ofUhertzourt should be left wide open for furtherance of RULING interest of T^ticexput Date of Last not to the extent of turning court in to the library of Order: 24/02/2021 Date of Ruling: 24/02/2021 litigant case^files. From the records, applicant has lost interest to Z, G, Muruke, J, prosecure^ase filed 17 months ago. Accordingly, Wise labour application Applicant filed present application|yund^ certificate of urgency on 26th number 576/2019 is dismissed for want of ©rosecution. Z.G.Muruke JUDGE 24/02/2020 Ruling delivered in the absence of both parties. JUDGE 24/02/2020 2