19760302 TZHC Dodoma
- Citation
- 19760302 TZHC Dodoma
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 2 March 1976
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 2 March 1976
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The trial court's findings were supported by clear evidence of the appellant being caught in the act of bribery, and the sentence imposed was the mandatory minimum under the law.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence affirmed
02
Material facts
Parties
Ndumba s/o Mbeho
AppellantThe Republic
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Amount of Bribe: TZS 20
- Sentence: 3
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
whether the conviction for corrupt transaction with agent was proper
- 02
whether the sentence imposed was lawful
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant argued that the alleged episode was incredible and challenged both conviction and sentence.
- Respondent
- The respondent relied on the trial record showing the appellant was caught handing over a bribe to a police officer.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Prevention of Corruption Act No. 16 of 1971
Mandatory minimum sentence for corruption offences
- 02
General criminal law principles
Credibility of evidence and findings of trial court
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The trial court's findings were supported by clear evidence of the appellant being caught in the act of bribery, and the sentence imposed was the mandatory minimum under the law.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- conviction and sentence affirmed
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 2 March 1976
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 2 March 1976
qC 2aA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
T DODOMA APPELLATE. JURISDICTION. HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO0 227 OF 1973 ORIGINAL CRIMINAL CASE NO0 652 OF 1972
OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF DODOMA IISTRICT AT DODOMA Before: B.E'.0 Moshi . . • . .Resident Magistrate NDIJHBA S/O. MBEHO 0 0 Appellant (Original Accused) Versus THE REPUBLIC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Respondent 0 (original Prosecutor) Ctia'ge: Corrupt Transaction with ae•nt c/s 3(2) (3).(a) of the Corruption Prevntibn Act No. 16 of ].97I.
J U D GM E NT MWESIUMO, AG. J. On 11th July 1973 at Dodoma Dirict CouL... afore B.P. Moshi, Resident Magistrate, the appellant Ndumba s/o Nbeho was found guilty and convicted of Corrupt transaction with agents contrary to section 3(2)(3)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act No. 16 of 1971 and was resultantly sentenced to three years imprisonment. Aggrieved by that decision he now appeals to this Court against both conviction and sentence. Clearly this appeal has no merit at all because the record of the trial court leaves no slightest doubt in the fact that the appellant was caught in 'tflagrante delicto" handing over a bribe of shs, 20/= so that the recepient who was a Police officer and his subordinates should release two relatives of the appellant who had been caught dealing with a sale of a goat out of the official auction pxct8 and the same were put in •a land rover to be taken to Dodoma Police Station where charges would be preferred against them. In his memorandum of appeal which has two grounds the appellant dwells mainly, if not wholly, on what he calls the incredibility of the whole alleged episode but in the view of this Court the learned trial Resident Magistrate was entitled, in the circumstances of this case,.to take the view he took, and cr to a decision which is correct in law. I would dismiss this appeal in its entirety.f or even on the question of sentence awarded against him it was the mandatory minimum under the law. 000 0 .12
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.