19910614 TZCA Mwanza1
- Citation
- 19910614 TZCA Mwanza1
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 14 June 1991
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 14 June 1991
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
There was no evidence of provocation on record, so the trial judge was not required to direct assessors on that issue. The conviction for murder is firmly grounded and not disturbed.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction for murder affirmed
- sentence of death by hanging upheld
02
Material facts
Parties
Nicholaus Ferdinand
Appellant Counsel: Mr. MugambiluThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Lyimo03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the trial judge failed to direct assessors on the defence of provocation
- 02
Whether the conviction for murder was properly grounded
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant argued that the trial judge failed to address the defence of provocation in his summing up to the assessors, amounting to non-direction and vitiating the proceedings. He relied on the case of Tulubuzya Bituro v R (1977) TLR 264 and submitted that the proceedings should be quashed, and as the appellant had been in custody since March 1987, a retrial would not be in the interests of justice.
- Respondent
- The respondent argued there was no evidence of provocation in the prosecution's case, and even if the deceased's question could be considered provocative, it did not precipitate an instantaneous reaction. The appellant left and went to sleep. The respondent contended the appellant relied on self-defence, not provocation, and thus there was no non-direction on a non-existent issue.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Tulubuzya Bituro v R (1977) TLR 264
Failure by a judge to direct assessors on the issue of provocation, where evidence shows so, vitiates the entire proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
There was no evidence of provocation on record, so the trial judge was not required to direct assessors on that issue. The conviction for murder is firmly grounded and not disturbed.
Obiter and limits
- The explanation given by the appellant is a figment of his own imagination and unreal.
- The finding that the appellant laid in wait for the deceased is not supported by any evidence.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- conviction for murder affirmed
- sentence of death by hanging upheld
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 14 June 1991
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 14 June 1991
:~n~~~~~~R~r•.· _,, ,, , -/::,,/iJ : ·~: 1•· ".? {Tt ,· .,..,,,,-;_(·• ·· :-. "· , _ ,, ·.. -,. ·· · .· .: 1 ... ' ·1t·t,;_?< · ·, , ·•,\ .. I I ; •l • .,~. TIDJ COlmT · OF .~,U. OF Tl.HZ.::.NIA ··.• J,.T 1,Tifi:.NZA .,. (. l , rt:••~ i:.~\ •. r',;,,;.,;', l • ,. '1·~· ;..:;;.... ~.. ~ ~ : ' • · ,..~ J l1\:i'· ., ;r·:~e:,.., 1mmou.us FRZDnr1i1m ••••••••••••• APl'DLLi':.lrr i ,,:;{,:. 1 I :1}::-, VOl'SUS \l/~· ',[t ,v~~ . TILD ~Pl;.BLICe. o • • • • . o • • o. o •• o. • .~'w5PONDENT 11.!tfi{' ~"'~i'. <• • (1..ppocl frora tho· conviction of tho '· it~·'· ,~~;,.~.4 - ---·- ·'•r.- Iligh Court of Ta.nza.nin o.t Bukoba) ;,: ~~ (Moslu; ,. da.tod tho 5th da.y of Deooinbor, 1990 • in ·' Cr!t1ino.l Sessions Ca.se No. 3 of 192_0 . ,
JUDGME OF TID COURT RlJ§l.DillilU 9 J .t,. s This is yet a.nothor pc:.t:2otic co.so of po.tricide aver c. . •'"'' 1J: ••r.i ➔.....~ vecy trivia.l natter. Tho a::_Jpollo.nt, NICIIOL:i.US FE...'IDINi.ND, on .-_:;t·· ', the night of 27/3/1987 co.used tho regrotful donth of his fo.thor; '• F.!:l.IDllTlJID 3EJ,,iSTil~, by pfo:.-ci11u· his body four tir:i<>s with a. sp3c.r• ·: T'.mt ov3ning at th0ir aoLlo in l3otumbo Vill0{,;'0 1 Nuleba. District, tho o.ppolla.nt o.nd tho docen.sed, to13eth0r ui th the o.ppollc..nt I s po.torno.l uncle u..'ld erandraother, illO?OLD ;}DLES'l'Il-T (P_.1-~.1) a.nd Vl111YiJ.lL w/o ~~I;;L::STilf (P.;T.3~ ros:;_)Octiv~ly, wore m.vinG thoir suppor. The doc,:,a.sed asked the o.ppollc.nt whathor ho hc.d cooked food for tho doB• The uppell:.mt roplied o.n~rily -,~ ::, .- th.:i.t ho had not o.hd tl:.en, oquo.lly ongrily, ho unceroconiously left tho tc.'?Jl..:. fo-...· his :roora in the min ho\.!20. But tha wa.lkout · was Q.f'tor tho decoased h:ul doncmdod tho appollv.nt to cook for tho > u ;,: . , ·';!,;~. dog tho next oornine. The ~oo.l was had in t'.ho kitchon a.nd when ~J~-~-'- ;+.·:~i:,;. "''' it wo.s ovor tbo doceo.sod loft and ontored tb.e !JD.in houso. Then .. J."' ,.,., •'• , . / . . ' - . 2 i' P.W~3 hoo.rd. tho doceo.sod in tho roin hou.so so.ying 11mtoto o.moniua" which words drew hor into the house. 1.lns, tp 1:.£lr I- I horror she found hor son,
t1lo dacoasod, spro.wlod on tho·"' i:;round. It wo.s than her turn to cry out "oooawuc. awo.naneu'.'. Tha.t sUI:lfilonod P.,r .1 who, with th~ o.id of c wick lot1p, so.w tho dococsed in o. pool of blood c» the floor. Tho cppollont was nowhoro to bo seen. Unkno;m to them tho o.ppollc.nt had gone . to 1·oport tho killinu to c.nothor po.torno.l unolG, C ~ TIIOM.\S (.w.2), who wo.s living nearby. Tho o.ppollo.nt wo.s ho.ndod aver to tho Police o.nd ho told D/;JGT. MEDDA...'W (P.jl' .4) whore ho ho.d }'~~ loft tho murder wo.i.pon. Tho noxt ·a.a.y P,t·r.4 found the spoo.r '? exootly whore ho wo.s told it would bo found. :~ \._;'(;.. {I In his sworn dofonco tho o.ppollo.nt 01-mod tho story of .. ,:-1;,~ . ;·, ;tt tho prosecution up to tho point of his coin.J to sloop. Of course, ho did not so.y ho we.a MGXY• Wo 'bettor lot hicsolf procood fro□ thcro "As I we.a .i.sloop I folt socoone foolinc a.round, o.nd I o.skod who tho person wo.s. Tho porson ho.cl. soi:1othinc rosoc1llin6 on lo!l(; stick. llo o.ppr,ouchcd ao, n.nd I hold tho stick. I rcisod o.n a.lo.rm, mid t:i:-iod to push that parson. Ile L foll do,m, c.nd in tho scufflo I spoc.rod tho person. I roroinod with tho spoa.r. I clso s:poo.rod him. when· I pushed hia o:wo.y frow mo." A.ppellc.nt Q.(;,"'TOOd to bnvo loft tho spoo.r o.□onG t:ho bc.no.na troos c.nd to b.c.vo &ono to P.if .2. :3ut tho o.ppollo.nt clci.ood trot he told
P!-r.2 tho.t sor;ieono :lCd invo.ded his (o.:ppollo.nt 1s) houao. 1 Tho o.ppollo.nt sc.id thc.t it wo.s r.w.2, upon his return free :\ tho scone of tho incido~t,_who told hie tmt the docoo.sed was ;,I 'f ' :~ . his victic. '.,! •. ', MOSIIT, J. :prosiding avor tho IliGh Court of T2..nzc.nio. o.t Bukobo., convicted the o.p:pollo.nt of tho offonco of uurd.or o.nd i J ordorod hi □ to suffer doc.t:i. by h::.nein&, which is 00mg ctD.J..l011£;0d bofo:rq '\.ll;l' · It is thnt decision _, - ==--- , , . 3 T'.10 c.pl)oll::n": wa.s rcprosontcd by Hr. :C1UG..:.:;:J'J3iJ,1lJ, loru:nod counsel. Tio ha.:l cnl;y on0 ground of cppc:~l c.::d tl1c.t wc.2, ttc.t of tho fcJ.lm-o of the lc.:.:cnod trinl judi30 to doo.1 11i th tho dofenco of p:rovocc.tion in ~:is sui:i..1in& up to t~10 o.ssossors. . Mro ilue;m-a.'ba□u. so.id thc.t it wcs t:,.ndisputod t!lll.t tho o.ppellc.nt wa.s v.ery:,~-;ngry whon :10 ropliod to his fo.t!1or c.nd a.lso whon ho loft tho ta.ble. Howov0;,•, in his sunning up to tho o.ssossors tl10 lon.rned tria.l Judea wc.s contontod with scting "The o.c~uaod cppoa.rod offonded, · ll.?ld -:'.J13-rily cot out of tho ki tol1on end 1rnnt to tho r.1c.in house." Tho lee.mod ::..dvoc;:.to su1:i:-ii ttod k.(1t that w~ grossly insufficiont c.nd tha.t it c.r1oun.tod to non-cliroction. Ho r.:iliod on Tulu'buzyo. l3i turo v~ilo J..19Q.?:7 T.L.:l..264 thct fcilu:ro by o. judgo ~o
diroct o.ssossors on tho issue of p:covoco.tion, where, ovidonco shows so, vi ti.:•,tcs the ontiro procoodincs. The l0c.rned o.dvocc.te prc.;rod tho.t the proc-3odinc;s bo quc1shed o.nd c..rcuod tho.t c.s tho o.ppollc.nt :us bo:;n in cu.s tod;r since Merell, 1987 their o.n order for c, 1•otrio.l wodd not be in thG intorost of justicoo Resisting t:1e a.ppocl 0n 'uc.:;.a.lf of tl:.o llopublic/iosponrlont wa.s Mr. LYIMO, lee.mod P.rinoipcl Ctcto Ltto:rncy. IIo said tlul.t there wc.s no_ ovidonco of p:i.·ovocc.ticn in tho co.so Givon o:r tho ...... . ,,, prosecution and, ho o.d.dod, oven if tho question asked by tho decoo.sod could be falcon to ~lGVO boon provocctiva, it did no·t precj_pi te,to a.n instc.ntc.nootce :cs:icction. Tho a.ppolla.nt loft a.nd wont to sleep~ _I.Ir. L3•iDo ::;2.id thct in his defonce, tho o.ppella.nt novor clo.icod p.1'ov-oc:-,tio11 but ro.thcr r0liod on self-<l.ofoncoo VG:'o Lyirno o.ccopt0d t~mt if :tl:oro ho.d boon ,:;vidonco of provocc.tion t:.20n.th0ro wns non-direction but ••• /4 / ---·-=f --~---------·--=-===-==-· ---- =·=·~-=-=···-----------Y-·. ·' I / . . • on tho oViclonco ori" record thoro wo.s no provocntion a.nd so thoro wo.s no non-direction. '- ·/ f Tho doco;;,,sed, "'i,oinc- tho fc.thor, hn.d. o.skod n question on an ontiroly domestic oottor which should not, a.nd wo~d not give l.'iso to o.ny provocation to a. woll nc..nnorod_y.outh. This
is pqticulo.rly so uhon ~;oth tho fc.tllor c.nd tho son a.ppocllc..nt of qui tine tho tnblo ,-io.s o.n introductory .fron tho cho..pi;er on his l.:i.ck of r.mnnors nnd the killing,,-i ts 'c·onclusion. P. 1-T .1 told tho court thet a.fwr tho nppolla.nt hod GOno into. tho IilC.in house "T'.:on tho docoa.sod followed bi□ thoro" • Houowr, P.W.1 did not ki1ow for who.t purpose tho docoo.sod wont into tho min housc':11~{,o~lninod ·it4u,t thquch :, ,· tho doo-3nsod used to slo,~:p in tho k:i\ch~n ho hcd fre6. nccoss to tho min house. Wo c.ro not told wlic:·i>ti~crtspirod in the □cin houoo. Wo o.groo 'l:T.i th . .._, ~,•. lo'fo_o and the trfal Jud(f·\)!mt thei story of ~he o.ppello.rit .. tl)iit ho wo.a a.fta.ckod uhilo ~-1:1 bo_d is n pc.ck of ·lies. No wonder .. .. ... ·'· :~- .~. Hu,2/.rc."bc.rm did not . bother. ., .to •·. touch on it 2.·ff a.11. Tho o.ppoll~t elm.nod thc..t ho shouted yot noithµr P.;•T~1 nor"i~w.;, hoa:rd.)lio c.nd they woro not cross--oxu.uned or{ th:i.t oi ther. '°" Tholi·•·ono .. ,r-onders • •I • J , .I wby cftor disp~llin,:s tho c.ttcckor tl10 o.ppoii;;1t c'rid ·not· report to . P.W.-1 o.ni·P.W.3 1· who wore just outside, instoc.d ho wont ·to o. ·:·! .. :i:,:.:_.-.-·' : I, •• diatc-.nt_. tiliclo, P,~io2. It is ouvious to us thc.t thore wo.s no· o.tt~k o.nd tho o.ppello.nt did not o.llogD o.ny provoco.tion. Ilowovor, tho loo.mod Jud.go I a findine tl-.at the
o.ppollo.nt la.id in wa.it for tho dooonsod 'in tho sitting roor.i is not suppo:rtod uy miy ovidonco. All wo know is thc.t t!J.o doooc.sod tot into tho min house whoro ho oot his doc.th in tho hands of hi~ son. Tho oxplr..nction s-iven by tho o.ppollont is c. fignont of his own· ". ioc.einc. tion a.nd: unroo.l• ••• /5 '_··1 ·, .I I • ,; /-= .. + 5 + :;';i,', < ~ ... 1 ' on w!u.cL ·tho lee.mod Jud,:;-o could formulc..fo c. sur:iminf;'-UP on p:rovocc,tion to tha asscciso1·s. llcnco tb.cro could not bo a. non- direction on a. non-OJCistin& issue. The conviction for mu.'Clor is thorofor0 firr.Jly grounded c.nd wo do not hc.ve c. roo.son to dist~b it. . i ·,,J Tl1':l c.ppoul is disr.ri.ssode L. M. M/iKi;J,lE JUJTIC;I; OF .1U?P.::li.L. A. s. L• .Rli,NLDI1:'JU JU3TICE OF ;':J'l'.:·.;;~. D. P, M:.'JlIC1'J:JO I • ·,. I certify tb.o.t tbs is n. truo copy r:,f the oriGinnl. I j ( M. /3• ) lm.._F'UTY iIBGI Tl11Si. • . I I
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.