in the matter of an application by oletus wangabo for leave to apply for orders of certioreri and mandamus another vs oletus wangabo another 1994 tzhc 417 16 october 1
The application for certiorari and mandamus was filed outside the statutory six-month period following the final decision of the Police Force and Prisons Service Commission; therefore, it is time-barred and must be dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- in the matter of an application by oletus wangabo for leave to apply for orders of certioreri and mandamus another vs oletus wangabo another 1994 tzhc 417 16 october 1
- Parties
- Applicant: Oletus Wangabo; Respondent: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs; Respondent: Principal Secretary, President's Office; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- application dismissed as time-barred
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oletus Wangabo
Applicant
Principal Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs
Respondent
Principal Secretary, President's Office
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for certiorari and mandamus is time-barred under statutory limitation
- 2 Whether the applicant could appeal to the President's Office after the Police Force and Prisons Service Commission decision
Ratio Decidendi
The application for certiorari and mandamus was filed outside the statutory six-month period following the final decision of the Police Force and Prisons Service Commission; therefore, it is time-barred and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed as time-barred
Orders
- application dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Vi' ' ' ' • ^ -I m isc. c i v i l a r s s so*. 54 op 1993 In. the m atter o f an a p p lica tion byv C1SE5TOS WA#$ABO f o r leave to apply f o r orders i f C e rtiora ri and Mandamus < - . ~ •' . • ' • - • ■ "• - /?• • • >' &aa , , >;.s ' In the n a tter o f tjbe d eci jion o f the P rin cip al Secretary r JSinistry o f Hose A ffa ire and P rin cipal Secretary President* s O ffic e , ■■■• Between V < ; •' • r : .. \ ; : V. - \•. : ■■■ • r:- ■ •/ < • ..... ■' .- 'f1 ■ C: etus langabo r rL yv : .. .( '•s • . -V. / ■' . ., . And. . v .V-\-- The P rin cip a l Secretary M inistry o f fiom^ A ffa irs and K ' The P rin cip al Secretary P re sid e n ts O ffice* fhe Attorney General* m m . MAIKA. & ^ © a p p lica n t. Oletus Wangabo, was employed by the A ffa irs as an A ssistant In spector in the Pri0ons^]Depavia01l$# Be was dism issed from h is employment by the ■P rin cipal Secretary o f th at M inistry by le t t e r Sated 17 A pril 1990* His appeal to I- ■• i ’ -a. m i o e and Pinsons Sozvicc Commission was dism issed on ♦ S a y l9 9 1 * , ,~ iphe applicant petition ed to the President* s Offlo e # Tint He f ile d the a p p lica tion f o r orders o f c e r tio r a r i and mandamus, in th is cou rt on 19 August, 1993• ' ■ ' • - - • 1 *' ■ ' -!.* ' . . , " -V ' ^ At the commencement o f the heating p f th is a p p lica tio n , jfcr* ■wiAunda, learned Sta te Attorney* argued a p reliain a ry p o lity •th at , tHe a p p lica tion i s time-barred* and i t Should be dism issed* X& h is , «ttbiaifl8ionj learned Slate Attorney said that the a p p lica tion to th is court should hare been file d w ithin s ix months a fte r the d ecision ©if the P rin cip a l Secretary, M inistry o f Hone A ffa irs and a ft e r the Beldee Force and Prison Service Gasa&esioa1s deoisioxu Learned State A ttorney fu rth er said that even a ft e r the d ecision o f J& lioe Foree and P z ie o n ^ ^ m ^ e ° « ^ [<,^m nm lqated to the appl£#Mlt * * Way 1991» the applicant d id not f i l e the ap p lication to th is •oqzrt w ithin s ix months* The a p p lication was file d on 1$ Ai^piat ' ; - l a re p ly to the pralim ir.a-'y .p o ia t , r a is e d , Mr* Kashumb^gttf leA*Be4 ootm sel f o r the a p p lic a n t» se,:.' . ■feSja*^ th is ap p lication . could n o t 1)0 s^|ij|r: ' » n t i l the d e c is io n was'made by the P rin cip a l S ecretary to the P resid en t** O fflo e . That d e c is io n was maio cn 14 A p r il 1993 end t h is a p p lic a tio n ’ ' wall f i l e d on August 1993* Sc- Mr* Kashunbugu said th a t the Qp|vM^m^a|»»yi was f i l e d w ith in the s ta tu t o r r period o f s i x months, awfl bo i t «■»*» ‘ tin e -b a r r e d S . . ■ >’ She d e c is io n o f the Pol 3© Force and P risons Serried CommliH(£oxi nade i n t h is m atter was fin e r.* Section 7 ( 3) o f ' t h e P o lic e fo r c e 9XA P rison s S e ir io e CiOs^sdaVon jAot, No* 8 o f 1990 provides as f o ll o w s ; ■. \ , v V' y ' ' \t , ”The fin a l d is c ip lin a iy a u th o r ity in respect o f / o ffic e r s o f the rank o f A ssistan t. Trmpec to r to : the rank o f A ssistantC oim iesfdner i s irested in f ..■■■■ ^ the Coimaissionor,!' , ,, , r a p p lic a n t was an A s s is ta n t In sp e c to r , and when the O o a sissie a ' d ism issed h is appeal and o o n fim e d the d e c is io n b y t b e P r in c ip a l S e cr e ta ry o f. d ism issin g him# th at d e c is io n by the Gomiaissioja fin a l* I e n t i r e l y agree with Mro M«idunda th a t the aj> p l^ an t*s J> oom plaint to the iP resid en t^ O ff ic e was d o n e o u t s id e the p r o v is io n s o f 'the law#- and in c id e n t a lly , the P r e s id e n t 's o f f i c e eonfinned the • d e c is io n by th@ Conmission* The a p p lica n t was re q u ire d } im m ediately a f t e r the Commission made i t s d e c is io n # to ap p ly to t h is C o u r t .fo r p r e r o g a tiv e o r d e r s , i f ho f e l t th at he was n o t f a i r l y tre a te d 2 There i s 1 no p itr r is io h a njw heie i n the/Jpolice t o r o e and P riso n , < S e rv ice Commission A c t, f o r a person aggrieved by the d e c is io n o f 4h$ Commission to appea 1 to the P r in c ip a l Secretary# the P resident* 0 O ffic e , S e c tio n 18 ( 3 ) o f the iaw Reform ( f a t a l A ociden ts and M iscella n eou s P ro v is io n s ) A ct a£ amended by Aclr No* 55 o f 1968 p ro v id e s a ? f o llo w s s - V:.- 4 . .-' "In the case of an application for-an older o f c e r t i o r a r i to remove any judgment# order# d e c r e e , eon v ictio ji o r oth er proceeding f o r v the purpose o f i t s being quashed le a v e s h a ll , \ . .not bd- grfcritedr' u n ices the applioatlpi*: f o r r le a v e i s naS© ru/t le /i^ r than s i x months a f t e r , the date o f the proceeding o r such sh o r te r "period^ as may be proscribed under any A ct ** 4 * * n / The order which the a p p lic a n t i s seeking le a v e to apply f o r the purpose o f i t s being quashed, was made by -Hie Commission eonfirraed h is d ism issa l from employment. The C cm aissloa mafia I t s m on 4 Hay 1992 a»d imp ftQtaft 4«a JS> ,1992 find tills spp lio a tio n ’on 19 August 1993# *CSb« JMt Mr* Mwidunda subaitted* 18-'j application was file d a fter $«sa©d o f &l% monthsj ana so i t Is ttoe^barred* ' I t is JpsaQdSrtftaf’ < tfeat the-application be made. within six nontha a fte r the decision ■ i - <• - .>- -v-v •. i \ ■ T, ■■;-.<!'?’ ■-t: ■■. - ■■• \‘ '•v ’■.•.'...'f-../■:•.■•■■.■• was Hade* I f t h e r e w a s s u f f i c i e n t csfrisa f o r the d ela y * thS a p p lio a n t would have a p p lie d f o r le a v e to f i l e the a p p lic a t io n •» o u t o f t in e } leader s e c t io n 4 o f the Law o f LixaitatSion A et? *9« t? So suoh a p p lic a t io n has bee i made f o r e x te n s io n o f t in e * ■ ' ■ ■ ■ * ' 2ho application is tir -'—barred1 and i t is dieniesed w ith costs* ; : w. jujx® 9 m m S a la m 26th. Gotober, 1m * Mr. M*ssawo fo r JCr, KeBfcunbugtt fo r tbs sppliosnt Muirhgirtaj Stgfre AJtoaooy, foa? the xospan&ezx^ V