Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19730720 TZHC Mwanza

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The trial court's findings of fact regarding the appellants' participation in the assault were supported by evidence and visibility conditions; sentences imposed were reasonable.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeals dismissed in toto

02

Material facts

Parties

Orwa

Appellant

Liasianyi

Appellant

Republic

Respondent Counsel: L. P. Ntabaye

Amounts and remedies

  • Fine Imposed on Orwa: TZS 600
  • Imprisonment for Orwa (in Months): 6
  • Imprisonment for Liasianyi (in Months): 9

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellants denied involvement in the assault, claimed Masianyi was assaulted by others and Orwa intervened to stop the fight.
Respondent
Respondent maintained appellants participated in the assault and caused actual bodily harm.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    general criminal appellate practice

    Trial court's findings of fact are entitled to deference unless shown to be erroneous.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The trial court's findings of fact regarding the appellants' participation in the assault were supported by evidence and visibility conditions; sentences imposed were reasonable.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • appeals dismissed in toto

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 20 July 1973

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 20 July 1973

19730720 TZHC Mwanza

C cc: C - T:zIA 1 -7 AT IHfAZA. APPEllATE JuRISDICTION HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 506 OF 1972 Original Crinal 0ase No. 382 of 1972 of the District Court. of Musoma District at Musoma - Before: J.J.A. Liwale S Esq., Resident Magistrate. IRUI\TCrO OH1AA & A.NOTURR .... .................................. APPMJLANTS (Original Aced, persons) VERSUS: THERE:PUBI1IC ..... ., ...................................... RESPONDE1'TT (Oninal• Prosecutor) CHARGE: Assault causing actual bodily harm c/s. 241 of the Penal Code. JUDGEMENT. HEI-4aNDY,. J. Orwa and Liasianyi were jointly charged with and convicted of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to section 241 of the Penal Code Cap. 16.. Onvaa was fined ales. 600/= or iinprisonnent for 6 months in default. He did not pay the fine. Liasianyi was sentenced to imprisoront for 9 months. They appealed against their convictions and sentences. Both apol1ants were not present at the hearing of their. appeals, as they indicated that they did not wish to be present. The respondent Republic was represented by the learned State Attorney Lir. Llbilinyi. During the evening of the 5th of May, 1972, the complainant (PWl), Audar (P12) and others, were gathered at one of their houses. They were preparing their evening meals, and, in the course of their conversation, they beaxi to talk about the two appellants who were not only unnployed in

the village but they : sponged on them f or their food and it appears that this displeased them. IIasianyi overheard the conversation and asked the complainant to.confirm if he was the one complained of as well, and the complainant did so. This annoyed him, wherefore he entered his house and came out with 4 sticks which lie threw one after the other at the complaiiont. As the complainant was running away Masianyi called help of Orwaawho responded and .both of then be abound the complainant with stick b1ows Both appellants denied the allegation, but the trial court found that they did take part in the assault of the complainant, and caused the complainant to suffer cctual bodily harm. Ii their petitions for appeal, both appellants reiterated that they did not do it, and that Masian.yi was tho victim of the joint assault by . 7 people while Orwaa had just gone to help to stop the fighting. The appellants were, thercfot'e, disputing the findings of facts made by the trial court. However, having regard to the evidence and the conditions of visibility, I sec. no reason to doubt the accuracy of the findings of the trial court. The trial court hoard the evidence was entitled to hold as it did.. :As for the sentences, th?y were roasonable. • . . Order: As a result, theoe appeals are dismisscd in toto. Delivered in court, at Mwanza ? on the 20th day of July, 1973. TU (z. N. JUDGE. 20/7/73. Appe11ait - L. P. Ntabaye— State Attoey for Republic. p ., -p

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code section 241

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.