patric andrew vs the republic 1994 tzca 53 20 march 1994
- Citation
- patric andrew vs the republic 1994 tzca 53 20 march 1994
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 20 March 1994
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZCA
- Decision
- 20 March 1994
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal is barred by statute as it concerns non-legal issues and the appellant pleaded guilty unequivocally; therefore, the appeal must be dismissed in its entirety.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed in its entirety
02
Material facts
Parties
Patrick Andrew
AppellantThe Republic
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Sentence: years 5
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the appeal against conviction and sentence for causing grievous harm is maintainable given the plea of guilty and statutory bar on appeals regarding severity of sentence
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Appellant challenged the conviction and severity of sentence for causing grievous harm.
- Respondent
- Respondent relied on the appellant's unequivocal plea of guilty and statutory bar against appeals on non-legal issues including severity of sentence.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 6(7)(a) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1979
Appeals on non-legal issues, including severity of sentence, are barred where the appellant pleaded guilty unequivocally.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal is barred by statute as it concerns non-legal issues and the appellant pleaded guilty unequivocally; therefore, the appeal must be dismissed in its entirety.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- appeal dismissed in its entirety
Source and reliance status
TZCA · 20 March 1994
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZCA
Judgment· 20 March 1994
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OP TANZANIA
AT PAR US SALAAM (CORAM; MNZAVAS, J.A., MFALILA, J.A.. And LUBUVA. J .A .) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 19 OF 1994
BETWEEN PATRICK ANDREW...................................APPELLANT AND THE REPUBLIC............................... ... . RESPONDENT (Appeal from "the decision o f "the Higfr Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam) (Hapigano, J .) dated the 16th day o f June, 1993 in H/Court Criminal Appeal No# 68,..o f. .1223
JUDGEMENT OF THE COURT MFALILA. J .A .t As a second appeal, th is appeal against the appellant's conviction fo r the offence o f Causing grievous harm contrary to Seotion 225 o f the penal Code and the sentence o f fiv e years imprisonment is oloarly without merit, one whioh would have been summarily dismissed undor the new le g is la tio n empowering th is Court to do so* At the t r ia l, the appellant entered a plea o f g u ilty and subsequently agreed to the corroctnces o f the facts as narrated "by the prosecutor# The facts revealed the oallous nature o f the eyo* vioious attack which resulted in the complainant losing an /4 * In our view nothing could "be more grievous# The t r ia l magistrate viewed the offonco in the same lig h t and sentonocd the appellant to fiv e yoars imprisonment# On f ir s t appeal to the High Court, that Court, (Mapigano» J «) summarily rojocrtod the appoal oonviction -undor Section 36O o f the Criminal Proooduro, Act eiroollanthad unequivooally pleaded g u ilty to tho, charge and . ^ tf«■ . - - .against tho sentonoo undor Sootion 364 (1 ) (a ) o f tho eamq f«on aooount o f tho soriousnoss o f tho injury in fliotod on tho v oomplaineat. Ihe appollant lodgod this furthor appoal* :x Socrtion 6 (7 ) (a ) of .tho Appolleto Jurisdiction Act 1979* bars appoals liko tho prosont to this Court on non logal isauog including sovority of sontonoo# As tho prosont appoal fa lls ■,e<iuwly Vithin tho provisions o f this Socrtion* it is 'ki'" k its oatiroty* EiXED at PitR ES SALAAM" this 28th day o f llarohf 1994« N.S. WZMdB
JUSTICE OF APISAL L*M» MFijLITiA * 3TICB OF mE&i D.Z. LUHJVA ' JUSTICE OF AFH5AE, I o ortify that this is a truo copy of* tho original* ( ) ;-vi; SE^OR^IIEHJTY^Ifflq^qSniflR^
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.