radar ltd vs jimmy magyombo na wenzake 4 2021 tzhcld 64 30 machi 2021
The revision application was struck out because it was based on incorrect and incomplete proceedings from the CMA, making it impossible for the High Court to review the award properly.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- radar ltd vs jimmy magyombo na wenzake 4 2021 tzhcld 64 30 machi 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Radar Limited; Respondent: Jimmy Magyombo na wenzake 4
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Revision / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Employment, Procedural Irregularity, Revision Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Radar Limited
Applicant
Jimmy Magyombo na wenzake 4
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Revision / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the revision application was supported by proper proceedings from the Commission for Mediation and Arbitration (CMA)
- 2 Whether the High Court can review the CMA award without proper records
Ratio Decidendi
The revision application was struck out because it was based on incorrect and incomplete proceedings from the CMA, making it impossible for the High Court to review the award properly.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- Revision application No. 590/2019 is struck out from the court records.
- Applicant is granted thirty days to file a fresh revision with proper records.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
JAMUHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA MAHAKAMA YA TANZANIA MAHAKAMA KUU DIVISHENI YA KAZI DAR ES SALAAM MAOMBI YA MAREJEO NA. 590/2019 BAINA YA RADAR LIMITED MLETA MAOMBI NA JIMMY MAGYOMBO NA WENZAKE 4 MJIBU MAOMBI HUKUMU Tarehe ya mwisho ya Amri: 16/03/2021 & Tarehe ya Hukumu: 30/03/2021 V Z. G, Muruke, J, Jimmy Magyomboma;w,enzake 4 waliajiriwa na Radar Limited katika nyakati na tareh^tof^utj^waliachishwa kazi siku moja kufuatia mleta maombi kukosaskazijyjfekuwapa baada ya kukosa Zabuni Stat Oil Tanzania. Rada' Limited waleta maombi walikuwa wakihudumia Stat Oil Tanzania^ kwa^kuwapelekea madereva waliokuwa wamewaajiri, wajibu maombi wakiwa moja wa madereva hao. Baada ya kutoridhika na upunguzwaji huo, walifungua shauri la kazi Tume ya Usuluhishi na Uamuzi (CMA) Julai, 2015. Rada Limited waliweka pingamizi la awali na baada ya kusikilizwa pande zote, ombi. la akina Jimmy Magyombo na wenzake liliondolewa kwenye orodha ya mashauri (Struck out) na kupewa siku 14 1 kufungua shauri upya. Uamuzi huo ulitolewa tarehe 31/03/2016 kwenye mgogoro Kumbukumbu nambari CMA/DSM/KIN /R.245/15. Kutokana na hukumu iliyoambatanishwa kwenye marejeo haya, inaonekana wajibu maombi walifungua mgogoro namba CMA/DSM/KIN /R.1221/16/129, baada ya kusikilizwa pande zote, mleta maombi Radar Limited, aliamriwa kuwalipa wajibu maombi watano (5) snilingi 3/§22,381 kila moja, kwa ujumla shilingi, 17,611,905 (Milioni kumkna saba laki sita kumi na moja elfu mia tisa na tano). Uamuzi huo^h'adkumridhisha mleta § maombi, hivyo alifungua marejeo haya <akiitakay"M^hakama kufanya mapitiao, na kufuta uamuzi na tuzo ya Tume. Usikilizwaji ulikuwa kwa njia ya maandishi. Mawakili wa pande zote/mbilkwalikamilisha majumuisho. Kwa sababu ambazo nitazieleza baadayeijsintozungumzia hoja za msingi. Ikumbukwe kwambaHi) Waleta maombi walifungua mgogoro wa mwanzo kJ* kumbukumbu nambari CiyiA/DSM/'"KIN/R.243/15 ambao uliondolewa (struck out) tarehe. 31/03/2016\ (ii) Hukumu ipayojalamikiwa ni tuzo ya mgogoro kumbukumbu nambari CMA/DSM,/KIN^J1221/16/129 ulisomwa tarehe 24 mwezi Mei, 2019 na^pkafria lliyyoombwa kwenye Notisi ya marejeo ya tarehe '(iib)^'Ma:fiakama wito wa tarehe 19/07/2019, iliitisha jalada la Tume ^^^dmbukumbu nambari CMA/DSM/KIN/R.1221/16/129. (iv) Jalada tulilonalo la tume ni kumbukumbu nambari CMA/DSM/KIN /R.243/15 ambalo kesi iliondolewa (struck out). Kwa mantiki hiyo basi, marejeo haya hayana mwenendo stahiki. Mahakama haina mwenendo sahihi wa kuweza kuangalia ushahidi na 2 vielelezo stahiki, ili kuvipitia na kutoa uamuzi juu ya uamuzi na tuzo inayolalamikiwa. Bila kujua kilichojiri Tume, kwa kuangalia ushahidi na vielelezo, itakuwa ni sawa na kukalia tawi lisilokuwa na shina. Hivyo ni wazi kwamba marejeo haya yameambatana na kumbukumbu (proceedings) za tume zisizo sahihi. Hakuna namna nyingine zaidi ya kuyaondoa marejeo^haydXjswenye orodha ya mashauri yaliyopo kwenye kumbukumbu za^Mahakama. Kwa minajili ya utendaji haki (interest of justice) mareje'o ^nambari 590/2019 ft W yemeondolewa kwenye kumbukumbu za Mahakama(hii,/hata hivyo mleta maombi amepewa muda wa siku thelathini^-faO) kufungua marejeo mengine ikiwa ni pamoja kumbukumbu zakejsahihi. 30/03/2021 Hukumu hiijmetoiewa na kuthibitishwa leo mbele ya Flavian John kwa niaba ya\mletaJmaombi, na akishika mikoba ya Gasper Thulway. Z.G. Muruke JAJI 30/03/2021 3