NA TZHC Dar es Salaam6
- Citation
- NA TZHC Dar es Salaam6
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
There was reasonable and probable cause for the plaintiff's prosecution based on the evidence of stolen cables supplied by his company, and no malice was established. The defendants acted upon their duty to report the incident and did not initiate prosecution without grounds.
Court disposition
suit dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
02
Material facts
Parties
Rodrick Henney Ngowi
Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. F. S. MbuyaTanzania Portland Cement Company Ltd
1st Defendant Counsel: Dr. MwanduPeter Daniel Lusesa
2nd Defendant Counsel: Dr. MwanduAmounts and remedies
- Special Damages Claimed: TZS 150,000
- General Damages Claimed: TZS 20,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the prosecution of the plaintiff was without reasonable and probable cause and with malice
- 02
Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Plaintiff alleged that his prosecution was malicious and without reasonable or probable cause, seeking damages for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment.
- Respondent
- Defendants argued that prosecution was based on reasonable and probable cause, arising from a complaint by Tanzania Posts and Telecommunications Corporation regarding stolen cables supplied by plaintiff's company.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Smith (1938) AC 305; Edward Celestine & others Vs Deogratios Paulo (1982) TLR 247; Bhoke Chucha V Daniel Misenji (1983) TLR 329; Ali Mohamed Osman V D.C. Hill 2 TLR 183, 189; Gower, ICB 1 Modern Company Law, 4th Edition (1979); Halsbury's Laws of England (1988) Vol. 7 page 730 paras 1000-5; Campbell Vs Padding Corporation (1911) TLR 369; H.L. Bolton (Engineering) Co. V. T.J. Graham & Sons Ltd (1957) QB 159, (1955) 3 All ER 624.
Reasonable and probable cause requires information and honest belief founded upon reasonable grounds, a prima facie case.
- 02
Gower, ICB 1 Modern Company Law, 4th Edition (1979); Halsbury's Laws of England (1988) Vol. 7 page 730.
Corporate criminal liability imputes the state of mind of directors and managers to the company.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
There was reasonable and probable cause for the plaintiff's prosecution based on the evidence of stolen cables supplied by his company, and no malice was established. The defendants acted upon their duty to report the incident and did not initiate prosecution without grounds.
Obiter and limits
- Plaintiff's terminal benefits were fully settled upon his request for termination of employment.
- Plaintiff, as director of the supplying company, is vicariously imputed with its state of mind.
Court disposition
suit dismissed
- Plaintiff's suit is dismissed.
Source and reliance status
TZHC
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment
. ,J cmL CASE NO. 1C1/93 IDDRICK H. NGOWI ••• o • • • • • o . . . . Versus TANZANIA :OORTLAND CEMENT PEI1Ell DANIEL LUSESA • • • • • • ·-· 0 • .,
JUDGMENT llIEMA. J: Tli& lll,tul,tif':f' Rodrick Henney Ngowi hns instituted o. auit o.gl'inst ~ ~ i t l Porl~nd Cecent Compr:'.n~· Ltd one: Peter Doniel LuseBtl, '1st 411d 2nd de!endrults respectively, jcbtly o.nd sevoro.lly cbir.:iug donrogee for m1:Uc~Ql,l9 J)X'osecution :md f:::.lse :irt-Jrisonuiont .. The· pbinti«"f -el:iims ~f"150,000/= OS specinl drunoges ::-.nd T.Shs~ 20,000,000/= os - ~ ~omngea, interests, costs o.nd ony other relief ceemed Op!)l'e~iate to be gTMted. 'lhe pfo.intiff nt the tl"iol 6 0.ve sole testi::ior.y ir:i support of h~ suit, whil0 the second defendc1-:it nnd one Hr. Gerv:-.s Mboni~ ~~t.i.£.ied for t:1t defence. Eot:: :p~tics 1-rere re.,..re~c~tec by counsel; Mr• F. S. Mbuyn r:dvoco.ted for t!1e pl.J..:.~~tiff .:::r:id Dr. lfi:'.::~'l:..nd.:: 3ppeQred _for ~be defendo.r:ts. The plointiff .:m elE;-,t!-ic::u e:-:;;i1,e€:r ucs t;. fornie·• et:;Jl~ of the fi;-st d9£end.m.t hc=.cl~~ the Elec-,_-:2'.'i :ol : e··-.rtme~. t ti1ereto. In tho.t capo.city tho pl::i:r!:L:::' 1::·::::: :-eep:-::---s:.. _l. 1 ::: ·-:nr; ctr'7~. for oecol'M1e!2:l:Mrc tenders for vc::riot:e .c::i.'t\o :;md · 01 :< -·:·:..:::.~. :--"?J: Le.:::-.:; t-.:> t:he first 1 defendont. One cf ':!"e cc:~.::iie:s - . ,-r=-~-' · ·- ·ivE::r. ter.c.,ero v.r::s Kiltils Jntestote-C<;>opo:::,y Ltd, o fc::-.ily cc.,---:-:-.:--:· ·"-uhi:._: thG rlr:.ntiff'"'\'l!!tS:n Directoro It is iri evidence
tb-:,t somctir'i..:. :i.n 199'3 Kilub Intestote Comp~ny Ltd supplied lerge quo.r:tities c: teler.:,0ne cnble_s c ~ o. strunp m::trk of the T::m~on:.o Fasts nr;d ·:;:;J 3cor;:::-u:::icntions. 'Illese telephone cables were l:ter ect~blished tc h~ve been stolen from the Tonzo.nia Posts nnd Telecor.r:u:~ic::ti.:ns e;o·-}own / yord, on· incident· which led to the ::irrest ·011::l ·1,rosecu. .::.on of the Plaintiff.., 0 It came .t() poss thot the pl::.intiff wD:S ::.cquitt.ed d the. tGrnin..,tion of the triol. ':'he pl~::.ntiff opte..:: ·to h=vo hiG r.crvices Hi th the 1st defendont -:::erminnted when ·he l0m"T.t Ah~t di.suplin::-.ry Jlroc~edings - og~nst him wer& 1mderway4 It is on record tho.t ploi.nti!f's all tei-minnl benefits were rul.~ .settied. ·At the tl'ial. tlie foild~i~~ :four iesues wre t.r-nrned tllld a~ed 1;0. n~;· . ~Q~ twi w110~.,~~ioll: -~~~~t-~tf ~- of:h..:i til~intiff4e ........... :fti~; ldb.o¼h~ tho prc,ooeu'tio:i. t,l!IS withou.; ~oi,abl,e i,i . .r . . ... ptobcbl,.~ CelWH~ and mo.lice t - • -·-- ... ':t, ;r .Beliefs.- ..... n-om the evidence on r-,~ord it is ;-;~tin d ~ • 9 ~t ~ . ~ t,£ -tJhe :t,li::dti,tif:f tGri:.;in,,!€-<l iD his o.cquitto.l4 aa 8llO ....: ~ ~nd issue ctl::i s~fely be pint tt. reet l:ere o.nd no'l/i; .With ragclI'd to thE- first, issu~ i* is o.llaged b:Y the ph~tUf ~.:: •· • • •• 0 _,l'z1 para .5 of the pl~t thet follci;Jir~ th-a arrest cm~
dotaet~ tb,e ...:: .:.·.:~·:~·.::;./.".~tiff :wns chDi'ged with the. o:-:£enc~ cf tfte!lling c/s _,., :- 258 Ue' . .. . ""·~ .' . - - - ~-Of th..: Fencl Cc-1E- in :l;2 .:::.st:d.c~ C.:-,-.rrt __ of Ilnl::i. :..t ~ £n : .. -~-. ....--.cri.min~ C!IDe NQ. 42";i/91 » Th~ plcd.nti:::: :1ru:.~~~sled out the ~ .·- ... -~-- -f ru ~ . . · t · -· · ·, ·~" end secon C d ~ f en ...,., a.J +-- .. .:., -- .a..,•. - ;·---- c.... ..a..- ...o . ,._"' -- 1- ..! ""'" -· -., . t-- ()$~ct.£ ion~ llcn, Hilf!. 1 tha .. teetioony on :::·l.?cord bc, 1;h at be -::::::::.:..::i!nl one~ civil. trh\ doea ~-t support t;1e ·cl-,'..l.ir.1. -~ e~ITac~~~'· si.~:::::::.~t;:,-3 'by. !:'r~- ~-:.::i-;un·da .'1\1 / _.gjs<:retion Slld r:;;...~~_bility for : ...e -.lr'"'·;:e~ of tl:c rl~inttrt ,I~ / : entirel..Y with t~t:- I-cl.ice r-:-:,~h r-::C€: p-:. o~:· :i, cc:t:_)ltiin-t :f::-om the ·-•. -·· ~zania Posts .::1;J T.,,:'..aco~ic:.:ticns ~--:--("·-., :ion. It i"' the ~ O . . . t . )iio ~yi,1chlly e;:xec:.::ti;.,d -:.: ·., c.r-~.:~-: oi .~,c ;-b ntiff cfter th& cleienda."1tl! ~ in:.:o!'"'1;ti.:ir. of LE: pr·(;·-,t'-1',c;; at their ; r e ~ of -~one c~bJ.e$ with 'l'P C: 'ro 1':,,.rks, e..-en:n~il~· contirrr.-ed to h~•"'8-_bea · ,.tQ].atl :fror.i its y::rd o.n ti stir,P~ied by the r:,l.'.'..i '1tiff' s cor.:pony• K.iJ.w.::i Intestote: Compru1y t. body cc::-ro~t~. Inv~t~tiqns een-iad out_.iJ:rto the ~ctiviti~s of Kiltll~
:>i~-ist::te Ccrr-~r.y iorgel;: i,y the ....... -· .,_.._ . .. ana defe!ldo.nt, evice!!ce ,re-veol~ ·. t.:-:.0 pl.cir.tiff's ·. . . ,ii,votve!l1ent I .•.. -as e COmpllllY direct.or. ,\t e:nt r.-te tte 1,hi1:-ti:f '1.~s ~ot ~dd',lce~ Qlly. cogent evidence to show th,t t~e c:!cfo~d~~, pros.erute.~ the . _plaj,nti.;ff ... Cn the contr~y there i:3 ~rr:;le te·Jtbcny th:-t 'the : ·- , I •..••t,. --: ~.· •t • .-:~ -~ ........ -· ..., ....... . ... .. ,.. •y, ...,••,· • '·,. defend::mts toge",;hor ,.,;ith offici:::ls. o: Le T::-:::12,,::mi::: Pos-ts & Teieeo- nummic~tio::s Cc,rpor~-:ion -~c.:::tif.ic.<l in ~h·:.:· crir::in~l trfol. In the event isnue ·numbe:r o~~L-· i.s o.r.ewcr0c: in f;hc nGgdive •. On the tl:ir.:: i~~,;.c 1::,,-.:.:. lct::r;:;•:c.: cc,un :::. ~- },- ·,re corectly r~t~'ted i the four cor:b1nr. :l clG~:j~~-;£ t~ es7.:~:;J_::...st ·tl'1 ·; :c~~ cf r~~:--licienS (b) The rr-ozccut:i.011 t-.:iri.:in - :·ed in the :;:.l:.intiff' s f.:,vour, onc1 ":1•; .. !t nee:ds no e1np~:oci3 th::.t (o.) c~1c (t) hriv& bc:~:J ct:~lt with. 'Ihe .,r:.9m:tining po;i.ntc :::or dctc:-:-:;i:rtion ::.::..·c (c) :,:-;~, (cJ). Ero Mbuyt,. l °'"'"'"".ed cou"'"'"'l J.•.,., ,,,-p-o·r._ o·r- .L'-,o \oP~.&..; J...U.:.;;l~ 1,1..... -- -""' £.:1·1·r·t1·1•fi,,, ··~J., :.;:,, c-·--o 1., ... o .J. ~-;,,~.;,.c"S :J.1J ...., the .,._.lt•.•. .:from·its: circ.;c-i:·~:.:--:3, tl:c,'" i.::;.:r.o
·c(:'::.:.,cr.·::,::- .er.:-; ,;00,:1 :'t:::.zc:.- v.>y'.the -'-.fe::Jci,"""t::;;· ~id 'no+ ,,cr,,-1 -," ,1 - r•- .: ~-:-· + _,, ,, ,-~ .,,..L ·•c--0 :.1,11;1 ~J.. .. " . _, '-' ... •-•.tJ-i..t--...i.... •.~--, "·,.,,' ·-..., : .,_, -·__,-;'----· -' ..., __,. ..- , .... '-· ....,,.lj ., . . . . . . . _.. - ~- •. It ,,, ·•· -···y Were not :,i::t:!. v'.J.t,c:c1 1::y ill 1.1L1.. :' ·er E:~::i.t~ ("" -· ::1pror'°-'r ;::.:., T··:.·,e ~g:dnst the :rl.'.lintiff. For ::::.r~ c;ei'c·n '.::-.rb ge::.·c:.::::,•.:;1~ belie::vc.::l .:.:~ "·:ie circu,. 0 lllatnr.cejs thr.it in c:c~.i·,•,;;rfr-::; r~- 'le.:: 1 e:..:::.,::>" to 'I!=' Kilub f lntestnte Co. ·Lt:.'! l:::c: - st ::cJ u:,1.i:;~.. :..2. :,:-norr.,.. '..!·;c to coriitr-~. o.n culr•rits ··.':: h 3 w,. 0 lloc': supi::lied '',\ .' . foe c.::.blen .to th..:i~· r.::·ernisc::: ... Thi'· ·61::•fenc~c.r:ts h-(1 ~~. l~scl c1uty to {,~ct .:mcl' r,epor·::- tl~,~ 1ncic1e:·:t. ~.,.•l-• , ••••· . •' - .•~.t:,:,. ._; • •o• ./4 ·,,-. .... - 'l- . .. : ; . ;.... , ...... ., .... - 4 V Smith (1938) AC 305 per the House of Loras; Edward Celestine & others Vs Deog~tios Paulo (1982) TLl:l 247, Bhoke Chuch~ V Doniel Misenj"(l ( 1983) TLR 329, Ali Mohomed Osm:1n V D.c .Hill 2 TLll 183 ot . 189, Gow.er, ICB 1 Modern Compony L:lw, 4th F,dition ('1979) Ctt p~ges ~ .;.. 213 1 Holsbury-1 s Laws of :England (1988) Vol. 7 ;-;ge 7'30 pnras 1000 • 5,Campbell Vs
Paddjng Oorporotio~ (1911) TI:3 369 and H.L. Bo1t0%1 !Ene;iw,laring) Co. V. T.J .Grahnn & Sens Ltd (1957) IQB 159, (19.55) 3 ALIER 624. ~.e legol principles enunciated rclde to 'IIUUlt c.onsitut98 ret1aoliable a3:10 pPob::ible CC-USO~ ie info=-:::·,tion llnd .ho=est ~lief founded upon reasonable .srounds, a :r:rimn focie oose and cor:pora1:e cri.-nin!ll liol-.ility 1,,;hc:reby the l.:iw puts :-; strict 11mjiw.tion to the• type of pe:;:-sc,;w ,,~c rep'.'esE;:1t the st,te of minC, . of th.a ~ Y : • 'Iha directer on(} ·,r,.~,,_..,g,ire do rE,:.:r'2lsent -t~e direeti.ng mind o.nd will of the ccmr,.:n:y :me th.::.-t foe stotc of dn.-:1 cf di.i-~tore QJld ~.:igers is the state of L',ir,J of the coE:pnny. It is not in dispute. tht:,.t the pl'."'.ir.tiff w~s :-::n:' i.::: n rureot~ of Kilul~ Int~et~.te, the cc:::j:'.:.:;;:· OS t~t:::i.r:h~d -;,: h:-..e sv.::rlied the •.~.~:-.drqp·wireG to thi? first c1efe::c:::ct. J1S. cuch th~ rlc ir;t{ft in .fo.w ..is to be vic:.ir~-0mly. i:nputc<.l on K:.lul:: • btcobte Cor:,p::.J:Jy~$ • ' • • ., t·!·J, ' ·1 I• -.state. ... , .~, .... of ••rninc.1 nnd ' t}Jcr0 .• '). . is no•. (Cl:bt tLc pl.:d::: ' ' ti:f 1•!r.:2. in6trumentol 'i . -:-,i· .. forI creotinr; the hm::_r:.ec:::, - =cl~·.ticchir b-::t·. -es::! ·t:.,E: fir~t defendant • . : , . : .. : .'"" ,:~.~• ~ ~ QDd Kilul.:i ,I:.1-t-t:~$t-:it12 Co. Ltd not-..-it::.:::-:.::.:·.:i::~_:": the
.:.r;~:--r.,.:1t. connict .:~ •• •"-' •' t 'l.'""r . .,/? , _ .;,., ... .,,..,...,..4- ,.,r·t••· Of ~:""',J.'-.:.c . . . ,- l•·'- .,.;. ,-.~~'-'•-' ,_,.._..:J-~c~.~ -~'--' •~•VC-u- •• ,::, .,,.. .r,, U"'' der---r-'---.,,,.,t ,_, '.• (:;_,, .~ ""''='•• ~-1 -'-• ,..._.~.1.-st th__"".~.I." ~,- . · I hole the:'c-::::re o~i t~c h:isis o:· the 1>:··.ct:;oin:-: th:•t .there wns .,indeed'.r€::l.Ssn,::~1le ::md i:i~c.:.:ic:;le- c:1u1e: for :>,e _-)loi::tiff' s i:,roseeut1cm 'ADd:ric injury- to the pl.::i::tif:::_1:1 :::ir:. r/:..:..rc.c-' ~r tv ..Dt:-::-cct O.W~Q of .i.:i r·.i..d1"':':i.,:n :any -ck.:~:.:ig~s ,.i.J.: :::c~Gt'.lr:'f: fo:r-:"'.s; tl::: };:l:dn:iff lt.::id all his te:::-dn,l lberiBfits p::dc1 out uron :1is_ re~uest :o h'.'ivc .11-::; ··erq:lo:t-mi:::nt tcrmin1:1ted-... 'He ·.hes -~rro:thiug to cfairJ from tl-.2 first ·cJcfe!:•:.::mt P,enernlly '.l.11cl;,ot~u1:--: ·otherwise~ -. . .• .. - .,."., ~ .... •;•,--:. J. t .. ··-- ·· Tu \he fin~i c.n~,lysfo the pl:dr:tif: 1 ;::; suit fails one :i.::::; __ ·. ·. ~- ---\,,~...:.i:. ·-~·· \ J3 • =-~ • 1-T. • Jr_e;.: ~ '',,
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.