Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

salum sizya

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Applicant lodged notice of appeal in time; delay in presenting appeal was beyond his control; extension of time is justified.

Court disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant is extended ten days to file fresh notice of appeal
  • Applicant is extended twenty-one days to lodge Petition of Appeal

02

Material facts

Parties

Salum Sizya @ Karuzi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent Counsel: Brenda Mayala, John Simon Joss

Amounts and remedies

  • Custodial Sentence Per Count: years 5
  • Extension for Notice of Appeal: days 10
  • Extension for Petition of Appeal: days 21

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Extension of Time to Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant should be granted extension of time to appeal against conviction and sentence

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant lodged notice of appeal timely but appeal was presented late by prison authorities, resulting in rejection as out of time.
Respondent
State Attorneys did not object and agreed applicant made requisite efforts to initiate appeal process by filing notice in time.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Tanzanian appellate procedure

    Extension of time may be granted where delay is caused by circumstances beyond applicant's control and applicant has shown diligence.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Applicant lodged notice of appeal in time; delay in presenting appeal was beyond his control; extension of time is justified.

Court disposition

application allowed

  • Applicant is extended ten days to file fresh notice of appeal
  • Applicant is extended twenty-one days to lodge Petition of Appeal

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 1 January 2025

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 1 January 2025

salum sizya

THE JUDICIARY OF TANZANIA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 000025407 OF 2024 SALUM SIZYA @ KARUZI .............................. COMPLAINANT / APPELLANT /

APPLICANT

VERSUS REPUBLIC .............................. RESPONDENT / DEFENDANT

RULING MATUMA, J The applicant is seeking an extension of time within which to appeal against the decision of the District Court of Sengerema vide Criminal case no. 20 of 2023 in which he was convicted for two counts of Burglary and Stealing. In each count he was sentenced to a custodial sentence of five years. At the hearing of this appeal, the appellant appeared in person being under custody while the Respondent was represented by M/S Brenda Mayala and John Simon Joss learned State Attorneys. The applicant submitted that having been convicted he lodged the notice of appeal timely but when he lodged his appeal the same was lately presented by Prison authorities and thus rejected on the ground that it was out of time. To prove his submission he showed to this court a notice of appeal which he filed to the District Court six days after his conviction and sentence. The learned State Attorneys did not object this application and prayed that the applicant be extended time to appeal because he made the requisite efforts to initiate the process of appeal by filing the notice in time. Having heard the parties, I agree with them that indeed the applicant lodged the notice in time which indicates that he was eager to prosecute his appeal. The late presentation of his Petition of Appeal was a matter beyond his control. This application is thus allowed and the applicant is extended ten days within which to file a fresh notice of appeal and twenty-one days within which to lodge his Petition of appeal. Page. 1 Hon. ATHUMANI MATUMA It is so ordered. Dated at MWANZA this 24th of March 2025 . A. MATUMA

JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT Page. 2 Hon. ATHUMANI MATUMA

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.