shaban yusuph another vs jonas manyaku 2010 tzhc 219 19 april 2010
Prosecution evidence was insufficient and identification unreliable; failure to call material witnesses and disregard of defence violated principles of fair trial; convictions not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
- Citation
- shaban yusuph another vs jonas manyaku 2010 tzhc 219 19 april 2010
- Parties
- Appellant: Shaban Yusuph; Appellant: Mrisho Hamisi; Respondent: Jonas Manyalu
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Shop Breaking, Armed Robbery, Evidence, Identification, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Shaban Yusuph
Appellant
Mrisho Hamisi
Appellant
Jonas Manyalu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 whether prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt
- 2 whether identification evidence was reliable
- 3 whether appellants' defence was properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
Prosecution evidence was insufficient and identification unreliable; failure to call material witnesses and disregard of defence violated principles of fair trial; convictions not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- convictions quashed
- sentences set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment