ntaka v lesotho communication 33 of 1989 1988 achpr 18 26 october 1988

ntaka v lesotho communication 33 of 1989 1988 achpr 18 26 october 1988

The communication is inadmissible because it is directed against a State which is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

Citation
ntaka v lesotho communication 33 of 1989 1988 achpr 18 26 october 1988
Parties
Applicant: Simon B. Ntaka; Respondent: Lesotho
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 October 1988
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility
Outcome
communication inadmissible
Legal Topics
Right to Free Movement, Admissibility of Communication
Source Language
English
Human Rights Law Right to Free Movement Admissibility of Communication

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon B. Ntaka

Applicant

Lesotho

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Admissibility

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the communication is admissible against a State not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The communication is inadmissible because it is directed against a State which is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

Court Disposition

communication inadmissible