Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Tanzania decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The African Commission found this refugee complaint inadmissible because the complainant did not show exhaustion of local remedies or identify any violated Charter provisions.
The African Commission found Njoka’s communication against Kenya inadmissible because the alleged violations predated Kenya’s Charter ratification and the complaint was vague.
The African Commission found Sana Dumbaya’s communication against The Gambia inadmissible because he had not shown that local remedies were exhausted.
The communication was declared inadmissible because it was directed against a State that is not a party to the African Charter.
Source excerpt
The African Commission declared a communication by Simon B. Ntaka against Lesotho inadmissible because Lesotho was not a party to the African Charter.
The African Commission held that a communication against the USA was inadmissible because the USA was not party to the African Charter.
The African Commission declared the communication inadmissible because it was directed against Yugoslavia, a state not party to the African Charter.
The African Commission declared Dr. Kodji Kofi’s communication against Ghana inadmissible because it was directed at a State not party to the African Charter.
The African Commission held a communication inadmissible because it was directed against the OAU, which was not a State or party to the African Charter.
The African Commission found this communication inadmissible because it was directed against a state not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
Explore more
