20150424 TZHC Dar es Salaam

i;A ~· ·,., .,.. .,:,:.•- . ~-- withdrdw"the app!icatiori for revievv Gn \Nhat he termed "the app!ication·has been pas:s·ed by f}'l(Hlts''. He did 1~ot: 90 further. However in reply the .. . . . _,.. /uico connotes Tantania Union d lni;lustric1l and Corn1nercial Workers ·Governrn€mt Noticci No. 106 0f 2007 I ·' ii 1 i ! '' I . - ·.... .,:.• . . . --· :··:,,., •. . -:· . - . learned ~ouns-el for. tht~ P~<~srjonc:Jenf resli.,t:ed the -'r)rayer to withdra"i.N san.s· J, . • .... . • ·(witt1ou· . t) t-n; , 0.·~ o,, . . . ,, ~,H !,. .p·:1vi~' ·:'.'Jt"'lf')ii(~·::1t·j· ,·-·,,·•j"S/ be,·~·::it .JC . . ,11 ('.,·)'. 1..L,.,'.l,. 'rp·- 'the'·. ".\ppl"1rant· k..n· E:lW' .Cl t··1·1~ ·.· tlr:1t \~ . .. ~ ~ . . _,C:h).) . - - - . CJ .. ·- - . case vvas pendrnu lx~fnrn the. Court of /\ppeal' of Tanzania.3, and lhe ,•\-'- 0 •~- 0 1,.,1,,_ ·•:•,.,':-, .. ,,_·t' I haw; dL)ly cbr:1sk.lcred the subrn\ssion of both parties on this issue. It . '::> ~t~'. '·,\'., . -.. )~ . is apparent cl<~ar that tJils c.1pp1lc1tlon for ff:view was filed by the applicants wf1ii!'\kno0rfg lhat t:11ere: wa,, ,.m appeal peliding before the highest court of tr1Ei la,n(rt~i wit, the Court: or ,1\ppeai in that sense filing of the review in U1e subordinate Court [Labr;u\' Court] was an abuse of court process and 3 'fhe Court of Appeal of Tamani,1 is tr:2 Hif,hest Court of tl:,~ _law comrnor,lv kr1own for its aero no my.as CAT ... I. . .:-! :'. Tb_e..act Of-'-tne~ appffcant to filf~ a review.-in.;this CULJrt while kr1;)Wir1g - . -~-:..'C---•· :.- -·-·-=th_at:-:H1t~ls-~~fh ap{Se·aT pending to l:he COLJrt of Appeai• c~or1C(~rnin~J the _: = --· ---Jrfat{J}~}s1,v~~~fr1ft largri a vio!~1tion of the law 2.nd bearing in rnind that lex ::· :·:._~c...:....:~-:.rip_o:.~g&,:;l,st vi__oliinrJia [tl·1e-1aw rn·ust-not be-violated-even by the kinq·] th(~·applicant TUICO cannot·stanci and speak that a~; Mr. Gilbe1 ;\dvocate ~ . ir:'4i\ f:o··r-"T-1.J1,·~.,~or.··!·1c·:.1·r11· 1-.:. (l I .u ,:.-~1•rl·- ...:,(. I ••.' . .I . /l•• ~-- _ ::;•:. ~ • l. ;_ ... ••·' , , . ~> .. : --.,,_::.~ .· _-. --:..·- - ---~_.:_, ' ·,,y - . . .-. vVr~ did m5( ifavc the intenlion to cause trouble before ·,.,,/"r.✓" 1 l t "•*"1.\'', the oartics· cJnd the court. n,c ano/icant did not file the . . I :1pp/k;-1[/on to disturb the Respondent we.iJfay cost not . /-', •, ) •/ . ,'-!J '•· ·----~ -~ .- t - ~. ., ':· - · ,, ,.,:, ) • •• ,;.; [.:,:: lv i1 ··1·l·-·ir/· •,,., .:;Td I f-.,, •••- ",··11, '-~...._. ,_ ., ,·\., •.• :vYIJa.t was tt1~~ raison d'etre J~eh}l1d . ~ -... t .. \. t1;/:rn~t[1ve of the applicant to j • • I, -l. 1 file ltic: appl;catton in this ccuil·, when tf1e malter was pending before the Cnurt ,c)f 1\1p0al? vVJs thr.~ filin9 of· the ai;plication imbued witl·1 e!ernents of . :\ · bcJd rnotiw:::.s, inl-.rr~r)sin9 t)a_(l<.lQQ _i_n court unn<-2.c;essarily or wa~; meant .to -·---~-· :.. , ··.•· .. '. ~ .::.... ·----~.i;\ ~:---·- ... , · ' . . . - ___ _.__.. · · c,J°use· dlrAc:ultios ·tc, r:he .J)t,UJie::; _in anending the application v:hicll had .. . .. ·_ : ·. _._ ·. ,: ;.:::<:.-. ~.. :.;,: . . . . . ·- - - ·· ·. - · - nothing to do? r tl!!nk ~111 _info rcnce may be drawn from e.very corner that 1 - i' \- - •' • - - • • ··· -..,._ ·:' ·~-tht~ ·aj)~)lic:an-t h,;~J- 6rJ!:;,-H:d· thls. ~:ast: fri~olous and vexatious in which case . . • ' • .. ~ • • !" .... .• .. . grimi:. .the issue l)f costs, because the explanations in defence - the court may . ~ said tJy Mr. ·<~iibet 1: 1\d 19c:1te for the applicant were Ji1 delicto [at faL'1ltJ "4 •• , 1 "t,.. ' .J1- ~ irnd 'rn.ere kkks of a dying..hoise in a1ticulo n,ortis [at the point of ; •'. de_aU'.J. There _wa~~ nolhlnq. valuable spoken by the learned counsel as lo wl·Jy they nlcd t!_H~ r.1ppllcation for review in tr1is court vvithout due regard to the pending and O)ncern€::;d rnatti:~r in the Court of Appeal. In futuro (in the future) such tl"iin~Js must not happen otherwise costs could be issued solely in terrore,n [as a w.drT1lng or deterrent]. ,, ' .. In. the ., . ' ' . ' Co_urt.: The p;_Hi.iC"s ,y.Ji--He ,nfonrir:d on the dat:c of the Ruling but have not