na TZHC Dar es salaam 5
- Citation
- na TZHC Dar es salaam 5
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Summary Rejection
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Summary Rejection
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal is summarily rejected as it discloses no sufficient grounds for interference with the decision of the lower court.
Court disposition
appeal summarily rejected
02
Material facts
Parties
The Republic
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Summary Rejection
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the appeal discloses sufficient grounds for consideration
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 317 of the Criminal Procedure Code
An appeal may be summarily rejected if it discloses no sufficient grounds for interference with the lower court's decision.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal is summarily rejected as it discloses no sufficient grounds for interference with the decision of the lower court.
Court disposition
appeal summarily rejected
Source and reliance status
TZHC
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment
4 Judgment or Order on Appeal (s.
320) Summary rejection (s.
317)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANTA Criminal Form No. 33 (App oved by the High Court under Section 352 of the Criminal Procedure Coie). z IA.
AT DAR ES SALAAM
APPELLATE JURISDICTION Cr.mni. APPEAL No OF 19.. Original Criminal Case No ............ ..... ........................ of 19.c1. of the District Court of ............. ..............................District at ........ ................................................ before................................................... Esq., Resident Appellant •.)/.. -.,. .... - - j (Original Accused) g ... versus THE REPUBLIC.......................................................................................... Respondent (Original Prosecutor) CHARGE: .•L•S.. O,. I 1.., .. ......... " S_S. ,-_-.-...---. 0/3 fl,J (o) L? ::.. . JDflN,/ORDER -5-..-.- ., . .- 5__• .5, ' -, 5_ 5 -- ........................ • --..-. ,/ fSS t-. .. . 1.L ...... • .5-.. '.-._ . /•• (•i '•---. / - 4j .•• (S.. L. . . . .. .. .. .... . .. ._. ,j . ._...J ....._J I•• .... - S.-"-. - Lboce S-SSS H. .: • .. .: -- ._ •.. _ (. 7_..'. 5'.-.. '-S_S •S• - " .St. - .. .. '..—,- .5 -.- -., .................. - S. — SS 5- .5 . S_. -. '- •5S . '. . . .1 .....- •..,L.. ..:. .. _•._(•.•,,._. 5 C.. - • ...._... - . . — .. . S - . • .s_ .... .5 5 .•. - -. .3 .5 . ..(..:... ............... '-S..,- . --'.j :. . ...-. • . ....._. ................. -........................ .._.. - . .... . 0 0 4_. ... o; 27 c... -J .. .,. ..3.-. ....-:.. . . '....- • .. . . . A - . ., '.5. 4, .,• ... ......,.._s_. (s.• . . ._. ----..,.,l ._,. .t.. .', .._.. L. . . s.,. . ... • . .:.. •. - .. ...... :. - . e .- s..; I• S • u : ?> t:i , zji :;_. •.;::::" c: L1 i L LO 5 - -'• - --' -i i. ., '.. •, , -, c_ ' . -.- .' .' 411, ) cJ . i. :.e.2..
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.