twahili chilumba mngwelule and 2 others vs crest mineral ltd 2023 tzhc 17252 11 may 2023
Repeated non-appearance by both parties and failure to prosecute the application justifies dismissal for want of prosecution.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- twahili chilumba mngwelule and 2 others vs crest mineral ltd 2023 tzhc 17252 11 may 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Twahili Chilumba Mngwelule and 2 Others; Respondent: Crest Minerals Ltd
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Revision / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Dismissed for want of prosecution
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Revision of Arbitration Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Twahili Chilumba Mngwelule and 2 Others
Applicant
Crest Minerals Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of parties
Ratio Decidendi
Repeated non-appearance by both parties and failure to prosecute the application justifies dismissal for want of prosecution.
Court Disposition
Dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- Labour Revision No.5 of 2022 is dismissed for want of prosecution
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (MTWARA DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT MTWARA LABOUR REVISION NO.5 OF 2022 (Originating from the Commission of Mediation and Arbitration for Lindi in Labour Dispute No. CMA/LIND/ARB/06/2021) TWAHILI CHILUMBA MNGWELULE AND 2 OTHERS................... ...APPLICANTS VERSUS CREST MINERALS LTD............... ............................RESPONDENT RULING 11/5/2023 LALTAIKA, J. Dissatisfied with an Award of the Commission for Mediation and Arbitration for Lindi at Lindi delivered on the 27th day of August 2021 (Hon. Kweka, A.J., Arbitrator) the applicants herein preferred this application for revision against the said Award. This matter came for the first time for mention on 19/8/2022 where no party to this matter appeared. Thereafter, for a total of six times (i.e 6/10/2022, 10/11/2022, 1/12/2022, 16/2/2023, 28/3/2023 and today 11/5/2023) neither the applicants nor the respondent entered appearance. What happens in the case at hand is akin to what happened in the case of Page 1 of 2 Steelcom Limited vs Ismail Issa Mbago and 30 Others, Labour Revision Application No.274 of 2019 where this court held that:- "Applicant filed present revision on 1st April 2019. Since filing no appearance has ever been made despite several court orders. From the records, applicant has lost interest to prosecute this matter not only on the reason of non- appearance, but failure to serve the respondent as ordered by the court on 23rd April 2019. This court cannot keep on adjoining this file, and return the same in the court shelves. Applicant has turned this court in to library of his client case file. Court duty is to hear and determine disputes. Applicant none appearance is glaring to prove lack of interest to prosecute the case." Having provided the applicants with the benefit of the doubt with regards to interest in prosecuting his application both common sense and administrative prudence dictates that this matter is ripe for dismissal for want of prosecution. Premised on the above, LABOUR REVISION NO.5 OF 2022 is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. It is so ordered. E.I.LALTAIKA JUDGE 11/5/2023 Page 2 of 2