19910318 TZHC Dar es Salaam3
- Citation
- 19910318 TZHC Dar es Salaam3
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 18 March 1991
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 18 March 1991
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The sentence imposed was not excessive and was appropriate given the statutory minimum and the applicant's plea of guilt.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- sentence affirmed
02
Material facts
Parties
Unknown Economic Agency
RespondentUnknown Applicant
ApplicantAmounts and remedies
- Amount Stolen: INR 5,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the sentence imposed was excessive given the plea of guilt and statutory minimum
- 02
Whether the trial magistrate erred in imposing the sentence
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant contended that the sentence was excessive and not justified given the circumstances and plea of guilt.
- Respondent
- Respondent argued that the amount stolen was substantial and the sentence was appropriate.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
statutory sentencing guidelines
Courts should impose sentences not exceeding the statutory minimum when the accused pleads guilty and demonstrates remorse.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The sentence imposed was not excessive and was appropriate given the statutory minimum and the applicant's plea of guilt.
Obiter and limits
- The applicant's honesty and self-recrimination are rare qualities deserving consideration.
- Had the applicant not been convicted of a lesser offence, he would be entitled to an even lower sentence.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- sentence affirmed
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 18 March 1991
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 18 March 1991
EICE:: GCJ.:~':.~ :J: ::::~. Ii:·__ !., L:::•::.--J;_._L lTC oJD/90 0::-::IC-IIL:~ c::.:::.=:-:-c~~-·.:::., c_·_s::..; l;C. 1009/09 r"1 r •--:-;, -, v \..,..., ... .- r. 0 vcrous lUCI-IJ.'.ili) EIHCI • J U ::J G 1: ~ iT T : ,,,,.. . . . ~ .. ~- ....,.,!'"'-- .., ..- - , - ~.. disctisfiod with the .I i / atolen ~ency, it is ~ot o~stcinc~lc. T0!dn~ i~to account the cli1:-iinis::iar.; ::)t:::.... c~_:,-0::_:;.1~ :;;;01-10-r of o..:;r □ hill:!.ne, I doatt thin:k, -i-ri th roc::,:oct, t:1c ,. :; c>:~2.2.i;::.:;s :four :::illion qu['.li:i:ics for being i110C:oc1u2to in 1972, 01" c".oc(:60 t7:rn::-oc:fter, ;;-rho~;. those 1:1i;-:iir.~u□ oe- ntoncoo wo:.. o 0:1.c,cto···.. L-t t:~., -~ ti::io s:1s .5000/- wns. qui to ouba.t... nntial :'lenco it wcs :it~i~cl7 ~ro~or to award / aentcneo, {.~ of fivo yonro for t~o t~ozt 0: cue~ coount or r.-wro, In the nbocnoo. " ~o □ ~oct:ul view, □anifc3tly c.,::cossivo, ......18 I thin!: 1t., oe:.1.tonco □ rc-vicwc.cl, But oven if'f in J .. - • ...! •• , v.L-~ ... •--' 2rnount of nonoy stolon is held to 1:;o cub::;tm:.ticl, ot:!.11. t;.:e c ,:m:co:100 cc:-.n:::10t ;)o fC!c<'.t'oC:. f'oi-- iJcine inndoe;,u:ito. Tho :f:::c,c t.'... ct :.--.oo=_)o;:ic.:o:.1t plce:clod guilt;~ oc.rns hir,1 11 • • • ~ . . . . . _It io cc J.01... clly, if' not uni·rcronlly, of:foncc uit:: tho exorcise and o con~oc~~J~ t~ a c~i~o, i."'.C o~~osod it out, ic en i:.1c:ica.tio:1.1
of' con-t:..~i tion. ~ '.2cre:forc in such n cc,so o. coc.:'t cn:.1. c:.D,cl c:.oos i1:::r;_Joo:: c. r..1ildcr Had he not been convictoc.: of " ac}:..ou.:.::lo o:.'.:':fcnco res:_Jo:i..::.. :mt; would be enti tlccl to oven louo:.... 001~-co1-:2c0 the:;_1 five yocrs ir.1:;_,:.•... sonr.1ont • his foolish c.ct·. . , ouopccts usually c:.o, no Gl1h::1icG::..-:.ruJ..1 r,::: ·.,;r-bc.:c:. t;:10 inc::..c:oIJ."- to his ,,#, ,;,; ,t': - 3 - r.a.re qunlity o:f hm,.ooty, a:-:cc.1 self' :;_~o::_Jo.rntion, tho loc.rnod trinl r.1nGistr2to wc:s bounc: ·to roci:;_.:>rocotc by~ at lonst, ir.-iposinG n acntonco whic:'l too:J not oxcoocl tho statutory r.tlnir.1u1:i. For this act, tho lonrnoc. t:i."'iol ,:10.ci::itl"'nto cc.L.11.ot :?o validly :fnultcd. This n:):Joc:1 i3 cccorcli:ncly c:.is::1io::rnc1. 1 n/3/1991
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.