Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19830727 TZHC Mbeya

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant's whereabouts are unknown and it is impossible to serve him.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed for non-prosecution

02

Material facts

Parties

Watson Lakbonga

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Dismissal for Non Prosecution

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the appeal should proceed in absence of the appellant

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellant sought to appeal conviction and sentence for stealing but could not be located.
Respondent
No argument presented due to appellant's absence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    court practice

    Appeals may be dismissed for non-prosecution if appellant cannot be served or located.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant's whereabouts are unknown and it is impossible to serve him.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • appeal dismissed for non-prosecution

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 27 July 1983

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 27 July 1983

19830727 TZHC Mbeya

- -•'' - -- •-' flT TIJE 11II1 COURT OF t IMI NIA API1JfT JJRISDICTIG (FO) CiiThiL'AL PPE1 NO 132 OF 198 -, :- - O.tUGl.L cliii L L C4S 10 55 Of 197 OP TIii fESTRICT COURT OF KYELDISTRIC BefQre: G. K.' Iviwakatundu, P.CJii. ' D.i\i. Maizi,1iq., Distric'bi/fgitra-te..: WATSON LAKBONG.a . . .......... ..

VERSUS

THE REPUBLIC LONIT GRGE: Stealing contrary to section 265 of tb.Q PØnal Code 3 0 R B ER MUNY1 }iapeiiant was co rieted byLusurxgo Ptimary Court iid sentenced to one year ip i-onment' on 24/4/79. He sorvd his sentence lon& ago. He wante ti appeI but his whereabouts are unknown snd it has been irnpoib1e' to se±ve him. The appeal is dismissed for non prosecution4 ---'I T I-BEYA F. '.kiLHIL ' If 27th Ju1r, 1.983. JUDE. N

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code section 265

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.